A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM Implementations and KISSASSing

PLM Implementations and KISSASSing
Oleg
Oleg
26 May, 2011 | 2 min for reading

Services is a significant part of every PLM implementation. According to CIMData, about 60% of cPDM revenues is coming from services. This is a huge number. Simplicity is another big issue related to PLM implementations. Keep it simple. Another important one is about to have C-level sponsor in an organization for your PLM project. To keep it simple and having C-level sponsor in your organization are, in my view, two most important elements of a successful PLM strategy.

The implementation of SharePoint always reminds me PLM implementation. It consumes a lot of energy, preparation, meeting and consulting work. The following blog post made me laugh – A new methodology for planning SharePoint Projects – how to win a tender. I learned a new buzzword or TLA (Three letter acronym): KISSASSing.

This is my favorite passage:

The problem I found with KISS is that when you pitch your design to other types of audience, for example, upper management, it tends not to be accepted. Initially, I thought it may be that management are less prone to like being called “stupid” (which is why I always phrased it “Keep it simple, silly!” – but that never improved things much), but the more I thought about it, I realized that those audiences just expect more out of a solution design than just simplicity. In other words – KISSing the upper management is not enough. This is why I decided to come up with my own new principle that extends KISS and adds the things that upper management really wants from a solution architect: Keep It Simple, Stable, Available, Scalable and Secure.

What is my conclusion? Simple, Stable, Available, Scalable, Secure.  This is actually, a very good slogan for PLM marketing campaign. Not sure marketing will take it. Have some smile :)… Live is short.

Best, Oleg

Disclosure: I’m acknowledging, this is my late Aprl-1 fool post.

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
3 April, 2019

I like data and databases. It is one of my favorite topics. Especially when it comes intertwined with PDM, PLM,...

29 June, 2011

In the early beginning, solutions for manufacturing were focusing primarily on machinery and mechanical design. The historical reason here is...

3 June, 2010

I had chance to read the following publication on Develop3D – A New Common Data Standard. The author is discussing...

3 July, 2015

Aras is probably doing something right. At least this is an immediate thought that comes to my mind when I...

3 September, 2024

In the last two articles, I discussed multiple aspects of SaaS PLM and cloud architectures. If you haven’t had the...

28 August, 2022

My attention was caught by the GrabCAD blog announcing a fond farewell to GrabCAD Workbench. I’ve been following GrabCAD for...

22 April, 2019

I attended ACE 2019 Aras Community Event that took place in Phoenix, AZ last week, Aras Corp branded it as...

23 August, 2011

I know, patent stories are hot now. After Google decided to pay Motorola the premium of USD 12.5B to defend...

17 January, 2025

Processes are the frameworks we create to make work efficient, minimizing errors and ensuring reliability. Product development process needs to...

Blogroll

To the top