Why PLM Should Care of SharePoint?

by Oleg on August 15, 2011 · View Comments

Business professionals around the world are using SharePoint to organize information and streamline the business processes. I talked with many people about SharePoint for the last years. The conclusion across the board – SharePoint is a technology that requires lots of IT and services involvement. SharePoint Dev Wiki shared an interesting article last month: SharePoint Development Orientation – Why Should We Care? by Lou Estrada. The following passage caught my attention:

SharePoint serves as an 80% solution for 100% of the organization. It provides value for everybody. It cannot solve all business problems, but it is not pigeon-holed to any one in particular, either. Chances are, more people will use SharePoint to help solve more problems than any custom application you have written. I have never written an application that had such potential.

SharePoint – an Advanced Development Platform

What I learned for all these years of dealing with multiple SharePoint usage examples is that SharePoint became a great platform for development of solutions of any kind. Similar to last 20 years of Microsoft Windows, you have an army of SharePoint developers who are interested to develop point solutions to solve business problems in any organization. Here is another quote from the same blog:

Furthermore, SharePoint is a springboard for professional solutions. Developers start with the 80% solution (or 5% or 95%) and simply close the gap. This is much more cost effective than developing or purchasing completely custom solutions. Businesses are likely to catch on simply because their custom development dollars can go much further. Developers start with all the features and infrastructure SharePoint has to offer. We get a head start with out-of-the-box (OOTB) features like easy integration with data and assets stored in SharePoint, easy integration with other solutions in the environment, a built-in API to access even custom data and functionality, built-in authentication and authorization, and much more.

Why PLM people should care?

When it comes to Product lifecyce management in manufacturing companies, organization of information and processes are two top critical questions. Let’s bring few more facts. A significant portion of cPDM business is delivered by service organization. According to analytical companies in this space, the number is about 50%. Another fact – because of complexity of usage, the majority of PLM implementations have problems to be delivered downstream. I believe, already today, organizations have complicated choice between proprietary PLM platforms and less-proprietary SharePoint as a platform to develop business solutions for product development . The question PLM people need to ask is what solution will be preferred by developers in manufacturing IT to deliver next business process feature?

What is my conclusion? I think, SharePoint can provide a good competition to many PLM platforms to deliver business solutions for product development in manufacturing organizations. When it will come to IT, the decision towards lower TCO can be a killer feature to define future of proprietary PLM platforms. Just my opinion. What is your take?

Best, Oleg

  • Share/Bookmark
  • ​The functions of SharePoint help your company quickly respond to changing company needs. Using SharePoint people can talk about ideas and abilities, create personalized solutions for particular needs, and find the right company information to create better choices.
     

  • beyondplm

    On the other side,SharePoint requires a lot of installation and maintenance work to be done. So, it labor intensive. IMHO.

  • Christian Barr

    Hi Oleg, it’s great that this topic of SharePoint and PLM
    continues to draw opinions.  Evidence to me that folks are seeking to
    connect the dots of product development data and process with business needs
    across all orgs; not just Engineering.

     

    PTC’s perspective continues to be that SharePoint’s adoption
    across the enterprise demonstrates its “utility-player” nature.  It is
    something that any user in the enterprise, whether in Eng, Manufacturing,
    Finance, Supply Chain, Service, or Sales can use to discover information they
    need to do their job.

     

    Does it qualify as a complete business solution that can
    displace established PLM platforms?  You know our thoughts on that J. 
    But when it comes to extending core PLM data and process into non-traditional
    users for other functions like collaboration and PPM, we’re believers.

     Thanks, Christian

  • beyondplm

    Christian, thanks for sharing your insight and PTC perspective. If I will take a look "beyond believe", and see what happens with SharePoint and PLM deployment, the reality can be not as nice as it has drawn in marketing brochures. Two elements to mention: incompatibility of PLM and SharePoint business models and significant need in services during the implementation. However, for MS-oriented IT, SharePoint can be a good platform to run all business implementations. Just my thoughts... Oleg

  • Randy

    I agree that Sharepoint has the potential to be important, but unfortunately at the moment Sharepoint is a strange combination of over-complexity with over-simplicity that makes it a poor platform for almost anything but file sharing with some workflow.  It's certainly great as a "distribution/consumption" platform, but not good for most business applications that make up (the definition anyway, of) PLM.

  • beyondplm

    Randy, I liked how you said "Sharepoint is a strange combination of over-complexity with over-simplicity". I've seen many times how people started with SharePoint with a feeling of "everything is possible" and ended up with huge service bill. However, if you're planning and using SharePoint as a development platform from the beginning, it cannot not be so bad. What is your take? Best, Oleg

blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post:

Next post: