A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM, Organization and Information Silos: Good, Bad and Ugly

PLM, Organization and Information Silos: Good, Bad and Ugly
Oleg
Oleg
2 October, 2011 | 2 min for reading

Earlier this month, I posted What is the biggest PLM challenge? Since then I had multiple conversations on twitter, blog and LinkedIn groups. Discussing a potential level of changes in the organization, I came to the topic of “information silos”. I found this topic interesting. Information silos – is it good or bad? Is it a problem at all? What PLM vision need to be applied to handle it? I wanted to quote one of my readers:

…It is about maintaining a trade-off between what is local and what is global in a company. The problem in my view is one of terminology. If we say “silos” we immediately think “bad”. This in turn promotes actions to minimize silos, which is harmful if driven too far. We need to conceptualize the organization in a different way. My take is “work practice” or similar constructs. An organization would be seen as a constellation of workpractices, each contributing to the overall goal of the organization. This would provide a perspective where trade-off, silos, business processes, etc., could be discussed from a more productive point of view.

I followed up the same topic on the round table during Autodesk Forum in Moscow. During the discussion, we found some interesting facts. Few participants mentioned that one of the challenges during PLM implementation is that PLM improve the transparency of  processes and corresponded information in an organization. You can say – this is a really good thing. However, I’ve heard people faced organizational resistance. Information and process control is a power in every organization. So, people responsible for it don’t want to lose it. At the same time PLM streamlines processes it reduces the power of “gate keepers”. This is the ugly truth.

What is my conclusion? PLM is not only about technology. It can (actually does) change the way organization works top-down and bottom up. To manage this change is an important part of every implementation. However, PLM technologies nee to allow to make this change more transparent and less painful. Just my thoughts… I’d be interested to hear more about your experience. Speak your mind.

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
25 September, 2009

The term “management” is very misused, in my view. Long time ago, somebody told me – if you don’t know...

7 January, 2013

What do you think about “social PLM” trend? I don’t see many cheerleaders of social PLM nowadays. The excitement and...

10 May, 2016

Once upon a time, we printed drawings and other related document and took them with us to design reviews and...

21 April, 2017

It was almost 20 years ago. I was developing AutoCAD software for customers in Israel. I remember a conversation with a...

23 June, 2009

One of the ambitious goals PLM puts in front of strategists, implementors and developers is to manage a product lifecycle...

16 July, 2009

In the past, I had chance to discuss many of the available MOSS 2007 features and capabilities on PLM Think...

29 December, 2022

Manufacturers across the globe are continuing to push forward with transformational digital initiatives, recognizing the need to adapt their operations...

14 February, 2018

It took me few days to catch up on my writing about Solidworks World 2018. But I’m not done yet....

2 June, 2017

Existing data management paradigms were formed for the last 20-30 years of software development in CAD, CAM, CAE, PDM, PLM...

Blogroll

To the top