PLM, Organization and Information Silos: Good, Bad and Ugly

by Oleg on October 2, 2011 · View Comments

Earlier this month, I posted What is the biggest PLM challenge? Since then I had multiple conversations on twitter, blog and LinkedIn groups. Discussing a potential level of changes in the organization, I came to the topic of “information silos”. I found this topic interesting. Information silos – is it good or bad? Is it a problem at all? What PLM vision need to be applied to handle it? I wanted to quote one of my readers:

…It is about maintaining a trade-off between what is local and what is global in a company. The problem in my view is one of terminology. If we say “silos” we immediately think “bad”. This in turn promotes actions to minimize silos, which is harmful if driven too far. We need to conceptualize the organization in a different way. My take is “work practice” or similar constructs. An organization would be seen as a constellation of workpractices, each contributing to the overall goal of the organization. This would provide a perspective where trade-off, silos, business processes, etc., could be discussed from a more productive point of view.

I followed up the same topic on the round table during Autodesk Forum in Moscow. During the discussion, we found some interesting facts. Few participants mentioned that one of the challenges during PLM implementation is that PLM improve the transparency of  processes and corresponded information in an organization. You can say – this is a really good thing. However, I’ve heard people faced organizational resistance. Information and process control is a power in every organization. So, people responsible for it don’t want to lose it. At the same time PLM streamlines processes it reduces the power of “gate keepers”. This is the ugly truth.

What is my conclusion? PLM is not only about technology. It can (actually does) change the way organization works top-down and bottom up. To manage this change is an important part of every implementation. However, PLM technologies nee to allow to make this change more transparent and less painful. Just my thoughts… I’d be interested to hear more about your experience. Speak your mind.

Best, Oleg

  • Share/Bookmark
  • Steve Ammann

    Hi Oleg - excellent topic- silos.
    I am reading a book called the Believing Brain, by  Michael Shermer. Michael is discussing our beliefs and patterns of thinking through brain imagery and other observations. Here is a quote from his book I thought was interesting and relevant based on reading your blog. "Upton Sinclair said it more succinctly: “It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his job depends on not understanding it.”That is my conclusion for the protection of Silos in organizations and why most  PLM implementations need a strong internal executive champion to succeed.

  • beyondplm

    Steve, thanks for commenting! I like the association you brought. My vote is for something that will help to find a right balance. I can see a hidden conflict between interest of individuals and company interests. PLM is trying to break organization silos and improve transparency,which is a change imposed to the company. However, company represented by people, and they are rejecting this change collectively. -Oleg

  • Brad

    Interesting connections Oleg. http://www.jostle.me/blog compiles posts from various insightful blogger on the good and bad of organizational silos and how best to bridge them.

  • beyondplm

    Brad, thanks for the link sharing. I will take a look on jostle.me. Best, Oleg

blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post:

Next post: