A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM, Organization and Information Silos: Good, Bad and Ugly

PLM, Organization and Information Silos: Good, Bad and Ugly
Oleg
Oleg
2 October, 2011 | 2 min for reading

Earlier this month, I posted What is the biggest PLM challenge? Since then I had multiple conversations on twitter, blog and LinkedIn groups. Discussing a potential level of changes in the organization, I came to the topic of “information silos”. I found this topic interesting. Information silos – is it good or bad? Is it a problem at all? What PLM vision need to be applied to handle it? I wanted to quote one of my readers:

…It is about maintaining a trade-off between what is local and what is global in a company. The problem in my view is one of terminology. If we say “silos” we immediately think “bad”. This in turn promotes actions to minimize silos, which is harmful if driven too far. We need to conceptualize the organization in a different way. My take is “work practice” or similar constructs. An organization would be seen as a constellation of workpractices, each contributing to the overall goal of the organization. This would provide a perspective where trade-off, silos, business processes, etc., could be discussed from a more productive point of view.

I followed up the same topic on the round table during Autodesk Forum in Moscow. During the discussion, we found some interesting facts. Few participants mentioned that one of the challenges during PLM implementation is that PLM improve the transparency of  processes and corresponded information in an organization. You can say – this is a really good thing. However, I’ve heard people faced organizational resistance. Information and process control is a power in every organization. So, people responsible for it don’t want to lose it. At the same time PLM streamlines processes it reduces the power of “gate keepers”. This is the ugly truth.

What is my conclusion? PLM is not only about technology. It can (actually does) change the way organization works top-down and bottom up. To manage this change is an important part of every implementation. However, PLM technologies nee to allow to make this change more transparent and less painful. Just my thoughts… I’d be interested to hear more about your experience. Speak your mind.

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
26 June, 2023

In the realm of engineering and manufacturing, making products faster, better, and with optimal cost is one of the biggest...

22 December, 2008

I was looking at the evolution of PLM (Product Lifecycle Management) and BIM (Building Information Modeling) and found interesting parallels...

26 February, 2009

Since last year, I have seen many discussions on the Web about PLM 2.0. The number of posts is growing…...

23 December, 2014

I’m following Facebook search development effort. Maybe you had a chance to read my earlier post about that – Why...

9 September, 2009

Why I decided to talk today about Collaborative PLM? I think “collaborative” buzz was with us quite long time, but...

7 March, 2013

After 20+ years of CAD and PDM development, the issue of versioning is not solved. How about that? I hope,...

23 August, 2016

I’ve been catching up on some of my reading follow ups early this week. I found the folloiwng article interesting...

6 December, 2016

At the beginning, PLM was a toolkit that was literally customized and build for a specific (usually large) manufacturing company....

22 January, 2016

Old concepts are sticky. Think about QUERTY keyboard. It was designed almost 150 years ago with a special reason –...

Blogroll

To the top