A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM, Organization and Information Silos: Good, Bad and Ugly

PLM, Organization and Information Silos: Good, Bad and Ugly
Oleg
Oleg
2 October, 2011 | 2 min for reading

Earlier this month, I posted What is the biggest PLM challenge? Since then I had multiple conversations on twitter, blog and LinkedIn groups. Discussing a potential level of changes in the organization, I came to the topic of “information silos”. I found this topic interesting. Information silos – is it good or bad? Is it a problem at all? What PLM vision need to be applied to handle it? I wanted to quote one of my readers:

…It is about maintaining a trade-off between what is local and what is global in a company. The problem in my view is one of terminology. If we say “silos” we immediately think “bad”. This in turn promotes actions to minimize silos, which is harmful if driven too far. We need to conceptualize the organization in a different way. My take is “work practice” or similar constructs. An organization would be seen as a constellation of workpractices, each contributing to the overall goal of the organization. This would provide a perspective where trade-off, silos, business processes, etc., could be discussed from a more productive point of view.

I followed up the same topic on the round table during Autodesk Forum in Moscow. During the discussion, we found some interesting facts. Few participants mentioned that one of the challenges during PLM implementation is that PLM improve the transparency of  processes and corresponded information in an organization. You can say – this is a really good thing. However, I’ve heard people faced organizational resistance. Information and process control is a power in every organization. So, people responsible for it don’t want to lose it. At the same time PLM streamlines processes it reduces the power of “gate keepers”. This is the ugly truth.

What is my conclusion? PLM is not only about technology. It can (actually does) change the way organization works top-down and bottom up. To manage this change is an important part of every implementation. However, PLM technologies nee to allow to make this change more transparent and less painful. Just my thoughts… I’d be interested to hear more about your experience. Speak your mind.

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
3 July, 2019

Unless you’ve been under the rock for the last five years, you’ve heard about DevOps. Still confused about DevOps? Start...

13 August, 2015

The amount of data around us is growing. The same applies to engineering and manufacturing companies. Our ability to collect...

27 February, 2020

I’m getting ready for CIMdata industry and market forum just in few weeks in Ann Arbor, MI. If you want...

14 September, 2013

Social hype is over. Period. I hope, I’ve got a social attention now :). Despite that conclusion, social topic keeps...

4 August, 2018

I’ve been following the story of Frame (also known as Fra.me or Mainframe2) company and their virtualization technology. Frame provided...

24 July, 2010

I want to talk about what I consider as one of the most controversial topics in the industry – PDM...

17 July, 2019

Some of my PLM friends like to say – PLM is a journey and not some kind of software. Well,...

6 December, 2008

  How to improve PLM processes before PLM system using BPMN. In many situations when I talked with customers they...

23 October, 2021

Earlier today, I’ve been catching up on some of the online events and reading. Today, I watched sessions from the...

Blogroll

To the top