A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Engineering.com PDM survey – clear results and not obvious conclusion

Engineering.com PDM survey – clear results and not obvious conclusion
Oleg
Oleg
26 June, 2017 | 2 min for reading

Five Ways Product Design Teams Fail at Data Management article by Engineering.com brings results of survey Engineering.com did to learn about design data management. The survey was sponsored by Solidworks. You can learn why product design teams fail at data management. The following chart gives you an idea about what is wrong with product development processes – data is poorly accessed, workflows are complex to manage, it is hard to share data outside of engineering.

The following link gives you an access to the full report (you will have to give up one of your email addresses to Engineering.com, which I did already long time ago). Inside I found some interesting data points. The first one is related to the percentage of CAD users not using any PDM system:

Although the number is still pretty high (49% of users doesn’t have any formal PDM system), I found it is significant improvement over the situation 5-10 years ago when majority of CAD systems were unmanaged. As you can see the number referenced by Monica Schnitger in 2012 that number of users with no PDM is about 60%. So, I can see an improvement here for the last 10 years.

The survey made me think about many problems product development organizations have and possible solutions to resolve. Although, the research is heavily focused on CAD file management, I think, the problem is not PDM. These days PDM can be acquired from CAD vendors or from one of PDM providers (some of them are free). The problem is how product development, engineering and manufacturing organization is organizing their data an processing to make it efficient. The following conclusion in Engineering.com survey is a good confirmation for that:

The most commonly reported important features to look for in a data management system were: (1) Easy to access from within your primary CAD system; (2) Allows easy, secure external data sharing; (3) Adaptable to our workflows without external customization.

What is my conclusion? I think vendors did maximum they can to bring reliable and affordable PDM system to manage CAD files. As user, you have variety of options (including free ones) and still 49% of customers are not using PDM systems. I can see 2 main reasons for that – 1/ CAD file management doesn’t solve the problem and the problem is wider; 2/ Regardless how efficient you manage files, the paradigm is bad and leads to inefficiency. So, organizations should take a broader look on how to manage product data – requirements, design, bill of materials, manufacturing plans and contract work to improve what is wrong with product development processes.  Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Want to learn more about PLM? Check out my new PLM Book website.

Disclaimer: I’m co-founder and CEO of openBoM developing cloud based bill of materials and inventory management tool for manufacturing companies, hardware startups and supply chain. My opinion can be unintentionally biased.

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
11 November, 2023

Let’s talk about the importance of digital transformation and the challenges that manufacturing companies are facing in product lifecycle management,...

30 October, 2009

This week was signed by a significant event – Dassault Systems announced intent to acquire IBM’s PLM Software distribution activities....

20 October, 2015

Technology is moving forward. The last wave of the development in cloud and mobile technologies, data management and collaboration created...

1 August, 2021

Every manufacturing company is sitting on the goldmine these days. I’m talking about the data that is owned by a...

5 April, 2018

I will be heading to COFES 2018 next week. Almost traditional gathering of CAD friends in warm Scottsdale Arizona. During...

30 April, 2018

Time ago, I published an article saying Aras PLM lines up against Windchill, Enovia and Teamcenter. Here is the conclusion...

5 May, 2016

Large CAD and PLM projects are very complex. They can involve multiple organizations, thousands of engineers and high level complexity...

15 January, 2016

How often you communicate using various messaging applications? My hunch you might use it more often that voice call these...

26 June, 2021

Efficiency and productivity are at the core of many decisions made by manufacturing companies. How to reduce the cost and...

Blogroll

To the top