A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Will “low code” save PLM from customization and make it more open?

Will “low code” save PLM from customization and make it more open?
Oleg
Oleg
18 July, 2019 | 3 min for reading

Have you heard about low-code development platforms? You better pay attention to low-code, since this cool buzzword and actually tools are coming to PLM space. Here is the Wikipedia version of what is LCDP. Check this out and draw your opinion.

Low-code development platform. … A low-code development platform (LCDP) is software that provides environment programmers use to create application software through graphical user interfaces and configuration instead of traditional computer programming.

G2 gives you a long list of LCDP. Check it out here. You can see various tools from a pure software development environment to workflow management tools. You can also see Mendix listed, which was recently acquired by Siemens PLM.

“Innovative MindSphere applications are being created everyday by Siemens, our partners and our customers,’” said Tony Hemmelgarn, President and CEO at Siemens Digital Industries Software. “With technology from Mendix, we can empower customers, regardless of technology background, to use low-code development to transform the way they approach and solve business problems. Adding the ability to create native MindSphere applications using the Mendix no-code/low-code approach can provide capabilities that are unmatched by any other industrial IoT provider.”

Recent Aras press release says the following:

In Version 12, Aras continues to extend the platform’s modeling engine by adding new low-code capabilities called the Content Modeling Framework and Technical Documents Framework. These enable the creation of sophisticated data models composed of content at the paragraph, section and field level. The related items are collectively treated as a single entity for the creation and management of documents with impact analysis of changes.

The low code made think about PLM customization and configurations (http://beyondplm.com/2015/10/06/plm-configuration-v-customization-lets-sort-it-out/). In the old days, you had to compile code to customize the PDM/PLM environment. These days are gone, but some legacy PLM systems are still around. For the last decade, configurable and flexible PLM was trending as a key requirement to provide a sustainable and resilient solution. It looks like low-code can be the next step. However, it is important to understand the details and implications. Both Mendix and Aras are coming with low-code messages they actually do different things.

Here is Mendix tour video:

I wasn’t able to find a short video of Aras Content Modeling Framework. Check this long demo if you have time.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJnH7nA5-oU

What is my conclusion? Mendix and Aras represent two different approaches to flexible development environments. In my view, Menix will be more “developer” oriented environment, while Aras is more administrator oriented environment. The questions I still have is how to deploy applications and what dependencies of these environments on the platform for both Mendix and Aras. A long time ago VBA was a platform for fast development inside Microsoft Office applications. It required you to code but provided a lot of flexibility and tools. Some CAD applications gave you a lot of flexibility and tools to build own applications. So, the idea of easy configuration, customization, and building apps is not entirely new. A new question – will low code save PLM from customizing and integrations? I don’t think so. The diversity of requirements and applications is still very high. At the same time, these are interesting tools to watch. And they are making platforms and tools more open. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Disclaimer: I’m co-founder and CEO of OpenBOM developing cloud-based bill of materials and inventory management tool for manufacturing companies, hardware startups, and supply chain. My opinion can be unintentionally biased.

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
14 January, 2009

The financial crisis possible can hit PLM companies… but remember, many successful and well-known companies were established during times of...

28 August, 2014

Continue the topic of efficient communication started yesterday about future of the email for engineers, I want to speak about...

21 June, 2010

My post “How To Manage ECO Without Paying $1’500 Per Seat” raised a very interesting discussion on Zero-Waite State blog...

9 March, 2019

In the world of product lifecycle management, there is a new buzzword “Bi-modal PLM”. If you missed my earlier articles,...

1 February, 2012

The world is changing fast. What was near to impossible 10 years ago tomorrow, becomes a reality today. It related...

30 January, 2009

Going back to the early days of enterprise software, vendors developed all  they needed from very basic operational systems features....

4 January, 2012

It is not unusual to hear about problems with PLM systems. It is costly, complicated, hard to implement and non-intuitive....

15 April, 2019

I was attending COFES 2019 last week. Three engineering software geeks – Brad Holtz, Evan Yares and Joel Orr founded...

2 March, 2019

Earlier this week my attention was caught by Siemens PLM tweet message claiming the definition of low-cost PLM. Check this...

Blogroll

To the top