A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Why PLM need a better search for IoT data?

Why PLM need a better search for IoT data?
Oleg
Oleg
2 October, 2014 | 2 min for reading

thing-search-4

I’m learning a lot these days about IoT. The amount of connected devices around us is growing and it raises lot of questions – how to store data produced by devices, what is the value of the information captured from variety of sensors and machines as well as how to make sense of this information. Google is part of Oxford dictionary. The last two decades of web taught us that good search is one of the fundamental elements of getting well with large amount of data.

My attention caught by GigaOM article Thingful upgrades its search engine for the internet of things. Thingful – a company that trying to make IoT searchable exactly in the way Google allows us to search web today. You can navigate to Thingful website and check by yourself.

Below you can see some of my experiments with browsing and searching things in Boston, MA as well as in my neighborhood.

thing-search-1

thing-search-2

thing-search-3

So, why PLM vendors should care? Search is clearly part of modern user experience in every system. IoT brings many new challenges such as gigantic data corpus, frequency of updates and new user experience challenges. It will probably requires more analytic approach rather than just “search experience”. I can imagine designer ability to research existing product behavior or requirements coming directly from products in the field.

In my previous posts I discussed the potential IoT data will blow up traditional PLM databases. The ability to search for a huge IoT data corpus is part of that. However, one of the biggest opportunity in the intersection of IoT and PLM is to extend product lifecycle management from engineering and manufacturing stages into the field of physical products.

What is my conclusion? We are getting in a very interesting phase when PLM has a potential to connect physical objects with virtual models. It changes the way we manage product lifecycle by extending reach and ability to handle more data. It will require better data management and search technologies. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
19 January, 2009

Social networks and social activities is drawing more and more focus in our life. Crowdsourcing has become very popular in...

19 November, 2021

Today’s manufacturing companies are facing challenges that go far beyond the typical issues of labor shortages, rising material costs, and...

8 August, 2012

Social. New buzz. You can hear it in many places. After the tremendous success of social networking and web, many...

1 July, 2013

Google Reader will stop today. It is official. Huffington post placed an article Google Reader is officially dead this morning...

24 May, 2011

Ask people about usability of PLM and other enterprise data management systems. From my experience, the answer is simple –...

18 November, 2016

The second day AU2016 keynote was focusing on news and updates about Autodesk product lines. Amar Hanspal, Senior VP of...

8 April, 2019

I continue to share my thoughts and impression from last week SuiteWorld 2019 event. If you missed some of my...

30 September, 2010

It was a long time I didn’t talk about Microsoft SharePoint. I tried to recall and found that my previous...

16 July, 2009

I’ve been reading amazing post by Larry Cheng about learning. “Look back 3–5 years from today and ask yourself if...

Blogroll

To the top