A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Why PLM need a better search for IoT data?

Why PLM need a better search for IoT data?
Oleg
Oleg
2 October, 2014 | 2 min for reading

thing-search-4

I’m learning a lot these days about IoT. The amount of connected devices around us is growing and it raises lot of questions – how to store data produced by devices, what is the value of the information captured from variety of sensors and machines as well as how to make sense of this information. Google is part of Oxford dictionary. The last two decades of web taught us that good search is one of the fundamental elements of getting well with large amount of data.

My attention caught by GigaOM article Thingful upgrades its search engine for the internet of things. Thingful – a company that trying to make IoT searchable exactly in the way Google allows us to search web today. You can navigate to Thingful website and check by yourself.

Below you can see some of my experiments with browsing and searching things in Boston, MA as well as in my neighborhood.

thing-search-1

thing-search-2

thing-search-3

So, why PLM vendors should care? Search is clearly part of modern user experience in every system. IoT brings many new challenges such as gigantic data corpus, frequency of updates and new user experience challenges. It will probably requires more analytic approach rather than just “search experience”. I can imagine designer ability to research existing product behavior or requirements coming directly from products in the field.

In my previous posts I discussed the potential IoT data will blow up traditional PLM databases. The ability to search for a huge IoT data corpus is part of that. However, one of the biggest opportunity in the intersection of IoT and PLM is to extend product lifecycle management from engineering and manufacturing stages into the field of physical products.

What is my conclusion? We are getting in a very interesting phase when PLM has a potential to connect physical objects with virtual models. It changes the way we manage product lifecycle by extending reach and ability to handle more data. It will require better data management and search technologies. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
31 December, 2011

Time is running fast, and 2011 is behind us. It is a moment to take a look in the past,...

23 September, 2011

I wanted to talk about Windows 8 today. Despite lots of talks we had about Macs, iPads and web during...

13 July, 2015

The number of hardware companies is growing and products are getting more complex.The nature of every hardware project is very...

16 July, 2010

Time ago, I had chance to write about PLM and Internet of Things on PLM Think Tank. Some interesting news...

20 January, 2012

Apple is going to eduction. Bam… It sounds fantastic. Textbooks are on the iPad. I was screening few publications about...

20 October, 2017

I’m digesting information from PDT Europe- the event I attended for the last 2 days in Gothenburg Sweden. Check website for...

15 March, 2010

Content is a King. If you create valuable content in your app, you can do whatever you want. Since everybody...

5 February, 2019

I’ve been following PI PLMx event in London yesterday and earlier today. While event is not over, I was able...

14 March, 2017

To implement PLM isn’t an easy project. Especially when it comes to large PLM implementations going beyond document management control...

Blogroll

To the top