A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Who owns PLM implementation project?

Who owns PLM implementation project?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
27 August, 2009 | 2 min for reading

plm-implementation-ownershipI’m coming with new discussion related to how we can successfully implement Product Lifecycle Management. I think, this issue is as important as to have good PLM technologies and ready to use functions in a product.

However, I see PLM-related implementation project uniqueness in the following factors:

1. Cross Functional. Large diversity of people and process involved into implementation. Traditionally PLM-related activity is spanning across multiple domains in organization, which position PLM influences a significant range of operational activities.

2. R&D involved. PLM is heavy impacted by R&D and Engineering activity of organization. Engineering and Product development work is unique in the way people see how they work and from a standpoint how they want to see computer systems manage their work.

3. Tools. Large diversity of software tools and providers involved. In very rare situation company uses single vendor solution for their development practices. The reasons are many historical, product development needs, acquisitions and mergers etc. As a result corporate IT zoo for PLM implementation may be easy include several dozens of tools and components.

With this specifics how I can see a possible PLM implementation project from ownerships standpoint.

1. Corporate Ownership. The corporate ownership absolutely must have successful PLM implementations. The leader of PLM implementation should have enough power, leadership and knowledge to harmonize diverse number of stakeholders involved into implementation.

2. Service Provider Ownership.
This is very typical situation for most of PLM implementation. Additional company (in many cases can represent major vendor for this customer), is taking overall responsibilities about implementation. Were advantages are clear, the disadvantages are practically the same lock and high dependence on such service provider, ability of service provider to work with a significant number of player in the same organization in parallel.

3. PLM Consultancy. There is situation when company decided to hire PLM consultant for planning and leading of PLM implementation. This PLM consultant needs to work with corp. resources and diverse teams to lead them toward PLM implementation. Such PLM consultant can also cooperate with Service Providers to do some additional work.

What is my conclusion so far? To have strong PLM project ownership and leadership is absolutely needed to PLM implementation. There is no single recipe how to implement PLM, company needs to work on their own plan and vision for PLM implementation. Diversity of vendors and tools provide an additional complexity in PLM implementations.

These are my thoughts…What do you think about that?

Best, Oleg.

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
27 February, 2021

One of the most frequent debates in the BOM management discipline is around the so-called single-BOM vs multi-BOM approach. My...

6 September, 2010

I decided to make an unusual post today. Because of holiday (Labor Day in USA), I spent most of the...

8 January, 2009

While looking at the amazing development of 3D Gaming Technologies recently , I’ve been wondering – is it possible to...

27 October, 2020

Moment PLM articles about the role, responsibilities, and desired skills of PLM architects caught my attention earlier this week. Check...

4 May, 2011

Microsoft Office plays a significant role in your engineering environment. Just think about the number of Excels you have to...

3 February, 2015

Here is my personal story about blogging. I started to blog more than six years ago. The idea of blogging...

19 January, 2017

It is not a secret that PLM workflow is very hard to implement. Every PLM system workflow implementation is balancing...

23 December, 2009

Short prompt to think about before Holiday break. Mashups. First coming to us with the world of Web 2.0 and...

12 June, 2017

If you’re long enough time in tech, you probably remember Knowledge Management (KM). KM emerged as a scientific discipline in...

Blogroll

To the top