A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Who owns PLM implementation project?

Who owns PLM implementation project?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
27 August, 2009 | 2 min for reading

plm-implementation-ownershipI’m coming with new discussion related to how we can successfully implement Product Lifecycle Management. I think, this issue is as important as to have good PLM technologies and ready to use functions in a product.

However, I see PLM-related implementation project uniqueness in the following factors:

1. Cross Functional. Large diversity of people and process involved into implementation. Traditionally PLM-related activity is spanning across multiple domains in organization, which position PLM influences a significant range of operational activities.

2. R&D involved. PLM is heavy impacted by R&D and Engineering activity of organization. Engineering and Product development work is unique in the way people see how they work and from a standpoint how they want to see computer systems manage their work.

3. Tools. Large diversity of software tools and providers involved. In very rare situation company uses single vendor solution for their development practices. The reasons are many historical, product development needs, acquisitions and mergers etc. As a result corporate IT zoo for PLM implementation may be easy include several dozens of tools and components.

With this specifics how I can see a possible PLM implementation project from ownerships standpoint.

1. Corporate Ownership. The corporate ownership absolutely must have successful PLM implementations. The leader of PLM implementation should have enough power, leadership and knowledge to harmonize diverse number of stakeholders involved into implementation.

2. Service Provider Ownership.
This is very typical situation for most of PLM implementation. Additional company (in many cases can represent major vendor for this customer), is taking overall responsibilities about implementation. Were advantages are clear, the disadvantages are practically the same lock and high dependence on such service provider, ability of service provider to work with a significant number of player in the same organization in parallel.

3. PLM Consultancy. There is situation when company decided to hire PLM consultant for planning and leading of PLM implementation. This PLM consultant needs to work with corp. resources and diverse teams to lead them toward PLM implementation. Such PLM consultant can also cooperate with Service Providers to do some additional work.

What is my conclusion so far? To have strong PLM project ownership and leadership is absolutely needed to PLM implementation. There is no single recipe how to implement PLM, company needs to work on their own plan and vision for PLM implementation. Diversity of vendors and tools provide an additional complexity in PLM implementations.

These are my thoughts…What do you think about that?

Best, Oleg.

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
1 February, 2017

After decades of using emails threads and sequential workflow diagrams for collaboration in enterprise, the shift is coming – welcome...

10 February, 2012

I’m coming to SolidWorks World 2012 this weekend. SWW is always a special event for me. This year, SolidWorks World...

29 July, 2020

PLM events go digital. If you missed my earlier blog about transformations of events, please check it here – PLM...

2 September, 2019

Last week, I presented at ConX19 (Digital Lifecycle and Future PLM Networks) event organized by IpX – The Institute for...

18 July, 2021

How big is the future SaaS/cloud PLM market? As much as this number sounds simple, the answer is not easy...

22 August, 2021

Data is taking a central stage in everything that businesses do these days. You can hear about digital strategies and...

14 June, 2019

I’ve been asked many times why I like CAD and PLM? One of the main reasons – connection to real-world...

9 February, 2017

Sometimes things are happening in a very unexpected way. And the news about Carl Bass stepping down as Autodesk CEO...

15 November, 2012

Integration is a tough job. Especially when it comes to the enterprise software. The typical manufacturing company landscape is siloed...

Blogroll

To the top