A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Pragmatic Architectures for PLM Future

Pragmatic Architectures for PLM Future
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
30 September, 2009 | 2 min for reading

Picture 9I think, we’ve faced many changes during past few years related to how enterprise software is going to be implemented. Shifts in business models, new social and cloud technologies, demand for free software and many others. Thinking about all these challenges and changes, I want to discuss what is potential outcome and impact on Product Lifecycle Management architecture and implementations.

In my view, we came to the point when PLM is adopted as a business methodology and business strategy. However, I think we still have a huge gap between understanding of business practice and technologies and implementations we have in the field. So, proposed principles are my ideas about to define a pragmatic PLM architecture for the next 5-7 years. I’m taking this time span, as something that allows us to change fundamental architectures of the systems and not only make cosmetics tweaks.

1. Individuals Interaction and Process Tools. What should be an approach to design process tools? It looks to me, the key capabilities should be in the way a specific user (individual if you will) can impact overall process design and process management in the organization. Process tools need to move from space where people are divided into “process planners” and “process execution”. No more “build vs. run”. The individuals in an organization will need to define right processes and be able to improve as business change in the organization.

2. Customers Collaboration. I think, we move to the space where a customer will decide how to assemble PLM system from a flexible set of PLM services. Those services will be developed and providers by PLM suppliers. However final system configuration will be defined by customer and answer to the specific needs of business and organization.

3. Permanent Change as a key factor to improve software.
Changes become a key factor in PLM architecture adoption. Today’s systems are very expensive in case you want to make a change in their configuration, data model, implementation practices. This is something we need to work on the future. Cost of change will be key driver to successful PLM implementation. Change is on going procedure. Together with future SaaS models it will finally remove the need in planning precise PLM implementation phases from year to year.

4. Working Software over Methodologies and Documentation. This is last, but very important. No more documentation. Architectures need to allow people to learn how PLM system works, systems will become self explained and self documented. In the same way, you can discover software code, you will be able to discover PLM implementations. This will be a future role of PLM architects in the organization.

This is, of course, not a recipe how to build new PLM system. However, I do so sense in these principles to think how to change enterprise PLM software in the future.

Just my thoughts. As usual, your comments are welcome!

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
20 February, 2009

I’d like to discuss 3D. The following 3D Perspectives blog post “Do Designers Really Want to Communicate in 3D?” got...

26 April, 2017

For long time, enterprise integration is one of the biggest challenges manufacturing companies are facing during PLM implementations. PLM integration can be...

9 March, 2015

This morning Onshape went from stealth mode into a public beta release. I’ve been using Onshape for the last few...

26 October, 2012

One interesting trend that I captured during my stay at PLM Innovation conference these days was about “information” word. It...

2 August, 2010

Some very interesting news is coming from Lockheed Martin. Navigate to the following link – Lockheed Martin Launches Open-Source Social Networking...

10 October, 2018

PLM project isn’t a piece of cake for many organization. Some people say PLM is never ending project. It is...

26 June, 2012

BAM. BAM. BAM. Social Enterprise. Do you think, it is about magic words? No, I don’t think so. If you...

6 December, 2020

The discussion about single-tenant vs multi-tenant cloud PLM models is getting more interesting every day. And it is not only...

2 October, 2019

One of the most interesting trends today to watch is how all companies are transforming into technology companies. Manufacturing companies...

Blogroll

To the top