A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Product and Process Models in PLM – What Should Come First?

Product and Process Models in PLM – What Should Come First?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
3 December, 2009 | 2 min for reading

Common definition of the process: “a set of activities leading to the desired outcome.” Despite such a simple and straightforward definition, the implementation of processes in PLM is often delayed and very frequently leads to significant complexity in implementation. I’d like to analyze and discover why this happens and what other factors can influence process implementation in an organization.

Process Model

Depending on the tools, technologies, and environment a customer has, processes in the organization can be modeled and implemented differently. Normally, there is more than one enterprise system in the organization capable of handling process modeling. Starting with middleware and specialized BPM software, followed by enterprise systems such as ERP and PLM, and ending with various Enterprise 2.0 collaboration tools, process models these days can be developed using multiple tools. Over the last few years, BPMN has become somewhat similar to a standard process definition tool. What is the main problem? Data. Various products and corporate data need to be injected into process implementation to make it work.

Product (Data) Model

Originally starting with CAD models, the product model has developed into an extended set of information describing various aspects and dimensions of a product—model, bill of material, requirements, items, information about customer requests, etc. As we learned from the process model definition, this specific product model information is needed to enable process definition. Processes actually need to access data to trigger tasks and events for handling processes.

So, what should come first? Product or Process?

My conclusion is that the lack of a rational product model can lead to a very high level of complexity in process definition and implementation. The product model is the foundation of the product lifecycle. Without a well-defined product model that can cover the enterprise product definition scope and related disciplines, the development of a process-oriented PLM environment becomes a complex and unachievable task. Organizations implementing PLM as a process environment need to invest first in the implementation or adoption of a product model that will serve as the foundation for processes.

What is your opinion?

What has been your experience with similar tasks and efforts?

Best,
Oleg

Disclaimer: I’m the co-founder and CEO of OpenBOM, a digital-thread platform providing cloud-native collaborative services including PDM, PLM, and ERP capabilities. With extensive experience in federated CAD-PDM and PLM architecture, I’m advocates for agile, open product models and cloud technologies in manufacturing. My opinion can be unintentionally biased

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
18 June, 2012

Let me ask you this… Is there a connection between PLM and Cupcakes? I hope I’ve got your attention for...

27 July, 2010

I read Jim Brown’s Can Siemens Make More Fun with HD-PLM? Jim is writing about the future of PLM experience. I...

30 April, 2018

Time ago, I published an article saying Aras PLM lines up against Windchill, Enovia and Teamcenter. Here is the conclusion...

28 August, 2009

I was reading the following article “Why Excel is not Enterprise BI Solution Yet. What I liked is the way...

30 July, 2010

I read Virtual Desktop Are Hot Again by Gigaom. The discussion is interesting and I see a real connection between cost reduction...

29 December, 2008

It has become obvious – social software has made revolutionary changes in our mind. Flickr, Twittter, MySpace, Facebook and many...

8 February, 2010

This weekend I was thinking about Value Engineering and how it can be supported in Product Lifecycle Management. So, just...

24 November, 2015

Mobile devices have changed the way we live for the last 5 years. A decade ago, I was perfectly satisfied...

17 February, 2012

This post was provoked by twitter conversation between me, Jonathan Scott of Razorleaf and Brian Roepke of Autodesk. Let me...

Blogroll

To the top