A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Product and Process Models in PLM – What Should Come First?

Product and Process Models in PLM – What Should Come First?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
3 December, 2009 | 2 min for reading

Common definition of the process: “a set of activities leading to the desired outcome.” Despite such a simple and straightforward definition, the implementation of processes in PLM is often delayed and very frequently leads to significant complexity in implementation. I’d like to analyze and discover why this happens and what other factors can influence process implementation in an organization.

Process Model

Depending on the tools, technologies, and environment a customer has, processes in the organization can be modeled and implemented differently. Normally, there is more than one enterprise system in the organization capable of handling process modeling. Starting with middleware and specialized BPM software, followed by enterprise systems such as ERP and PLM, and ending with various Enterprise 2.0 collaboration tools, process models these days can be developed using multiple tools. Over the last few years, BPMN has become somewhat similar to a standard process definition tool. What is the main problem? Data. Various products and corporate data need to be injected into process implementation to make it work.

Product (Data) Model

Originally starting with CAD models, the product model has developed into an extended set of information describing various aspects and dimensions of a product—model, bill of material, requirements, items, information about customer requests, etc. As we learned from the process model definition, this specific product model information is needed to enable process definition. Processes actually need to access data to trigger tasks and events for handling processes.

So, what should come first? Product or Process?

My conclusion is that the lack of a rational product model can lead to a very high level of complexity in process definition and implementation. The product model is the foundation of the product lifecycle. Without a well-defined product model that can cover the enterprise product definition scope and related disciplines, the development of a process-oriented PLM environment becomes a complex and unachievable task. Organizations implementing PLM as a process environment need to invest first in the implementation or adoption of a product model that will serve as the foundation for processes.

What is your opinion?

What has been your experience with similar tasks and efforts?

Best,
Oleg

Disclaimer: I’m the co-founder and CEO of OpenBOM, a digital-thread platform providing cloud-native collaborative services including PDM, PLM, and ERP capabilities. With extensive experience in federated CAD-PDM and PLM architecture, I’m advocates for agile, open product models and cloud technologies in manufacturing. My opinion can be unintentionally biased

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
10 September, 2010

I had a chance to read AESSIS blog post – Why Some People Don’t Like PLM?Graham started absolutely important discussion...

21 May, 2023

ChatGPT and similar tools have turned heads in several sectors, opening up new avenues of productivity, creativity, and accessibility. However,...

13 May, 2009

In one of my previous posts, I discussed the topic “Should PLM develop its own process tools? “. In this...

22 April, 2018

I enjoyed the discussion around the article I published earlier this week – Model-based confusion in 3D CAD and PLM....

15 January, 2025

I’m sure you’ve been thinking about hiring product lifecycle management consulting during the journey of PLM strategic planning and implementation....

30 January, 2015

We live in the era of changes. Think about the impact open source software (OSS) made on the software industry...

25 November, 2015

All PLM vendors can delivery some sort of cloud solutions today. You can see my recent update to PLM cloud...

5 February, 2009

SolidWorks World 2009 in coming to Orlando next week and I’m preparing to blog about this. And, yes… I’d like...

4 February, 2009

SharePoint is definitely moving forward. The latest Microsoft announcement folded Microsoft performance point and business process Management into its SharePoint...

Blogroll

To the top