A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

How PLM Vendors Can Listen To Competitors?

How PLM Vendors Can Listen To Competitors?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
17 January, 2010 | 2 min for reading

Last week I had chance to read Forbes’s article (Listen To Competitors — Not Customers), which made me think more about competition in Product Lifecycle Management. I read this article few times, and, I think, found why I felt not comfortable with position of author. The definition of customers is simple. Those people or organizations which consume products your organization manufactures. If you think about new markets, it is very simple to identify who are that organization or people you need to talk to. However, with competition the situation is not as simple. The definition of competition is subjective. You can consider the specific company (or product domain) as a competitive, but in fact, this is false reality.

In my view, today’s situation on the PLM market characterized by a very small amount of vendors that fight on the lucrative space of the specific services. At the same time, mainstream adoption of PLM is still a very significant problem. For the last decade, number of companies playing on PDM/PLM market decreased due to competitive acquisitions. If you will be listening to the PLM marketing, you can be confused by similarity of offering and messages. So, to realize a potential listening to the competitors the process of competitor’s selection need to be much different and going beyond Gartner Magic Quadrant.

So, what is my conclusion today? Discovering multiple ideas surrounding Product Lifecycle Management, I found many times that customer’s perspective on technology and product positioning is quite different from mainstream marketing presentations. Thus, you can find something, I’d call “alternative” and not “competition” to PLM. So, with such correction, I think, PLM companies need to watch alternatives to their solutions- it will create more balanced view and will focus on the competitiveness and ways to provide value to customers.

Just my thoughts…
Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
26 January, 2025

A long time ago, I came across a simple formula for building enterprise software: find a stakeholder in a company,...

10 March, 2010

One of the very important aspects of PLM as enterprise software is the ability to be implemented in the fast...

7 March, 2020

The big innovation is usually crisis-driven. Many researchers suggest we need to have a bit of kick to start changing...

21 November, 2019

AU2019 is in a full swing. I attended the general keynote session yesterday. From my experience, Andrew Anagnost, CEO of...

8 November, 2017

Platform is the next magic word these days. Everyone is building “platform” these days. Platform is sweet word, which sounds...

12 July, 2016

It usually takes time to implement PLM system. One of the reasons for that is heavy customization and adaptations of...

29 April, 2019

Engineering and manufacturing software companies have a dream to become an “Amazon of Manufacturing”. The idea is not new and...

7 May, 2010

You can find this post as something unusual. I decided to jump in my PLM Think Tank Time Machine in…...

14 July, 2017

Graphs are fascinating.  They represent the power of connection and intelligence. I’ve been following Microsoft Graph development for some time....

Blogroll

To the top