A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

CAD Strategies: Unified Or Diversified?

CAD Strategies: Unified Or Diversified?
Oleg
Oleg
10 August, 2010 | 3 min for reading

In my view, summer time is good for vacations, research papers and strategic projects. During the summer, you are always have an excuse to stop, think and do something unusual. This is also time to clean up emails and feeds. I read a new research paper just published by Jim Brown of TechClarity: Consolidating CAD – Strategic Advantages at Reduced Cost. I found it interesting. Jim’s conclusion is simple – consolidate your CADs, cut cost, reduce complexity, improve collaboration. It sounds very straightforward and simple. Nevertheless, some latest publications made me think that such a decision might be more complex. I’d like to propose to discuss it more and take a look on different perspectives of CAD unification decision.

Historical Status Quo

The status quo of engineering and manufacturing companies these days is multiple CAD systems. For different reasons, people are using different CADs. Usually, it was a result of historical decisions, old/new projects, M&A activities and some others. Large OEMs have a tendency to choose different CAD system also due to decisions taken by divisions. Suppliers are influenced by their work for multiple OEMs and also can consider various CAD options as sometime very reliable. In addition, cost factor is another reason why organizations can make their decision to diversify CAD packages.

Technological Trends

I can identify several important trends that can influence customer decision related to CAD system usage: (1) 3D direct modeling; (2) Openness; (3) Cloud.

3D Direct modeling
During last few years, we have seen a significant innovative activity so-called direct 3D modeling vs. parametric design. New and existing companies focused on direct 3D modeling drove established vendors to make acquisitions or made a significant development in this space.

Openness
This is not a completely new trend. Openness and interoperability have been very popular many years. My view, is that during the past couple of years, there is a renaissance of “openness discussion” driven by web development and open source related activities.

Cloud
This is another very popular trend. What will happen when/if CAD will be moving to the cloud? How to leverage cloud technology? There are lots of discussions about this topic recently happened in blogs, industry and vendor’s conferences.

PTC and the Future of MCAD
We are all waiting for PTC Lightning strike in October. A good review of what PTC is thinking about made by SolidSmack. Navigate to this link. Also, take a look on the following slide from PTC about this project – The Right Solution For Every User.

We don’t know for sure, what PTC is preparing as part of their new project. However, I can see a glimpse of thinking about tools’ diversification. You can read some “un-answered” questions about this project in Deelip’s blog.

SpaceClaim 3D – Not Only For Engineers
Navigate to the following link – SpaceClaim 2010 Externds to Non-Engineering Groups. You can see a definite interest of SpaceClaim to propose more diversification into 3D CAD usage in organizations.

Conclusion and Future Thinking

The advantages of a single tool and value proposition made by Jim in his research is clear for me. However, to implement unified CAD strategy can be complicated and long process. As an alternative, CAD vendors can propose new potential solutions to solve old problems  – open/free tools, cloud products, various tools’ diversification that can make customers think more about the CAD strategies.

Just my thoughts…
Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
15 January, 2015

Holidays are over and it was a good time to think about what you can expect in engineering and manufacturing...

30 August, 2009

Short note this Sunday. Take a look on a very interesting blind test site comparing different search engines – Bing...

23 February, 2020

Recent PLM Stack article – Thoughts about PLM Business Model caught my attention. Check this out here. The last decades...

2 December, 2014

Technology can help us to expand horizons of possible and impossible. I’ve been experiencing this expansion earlier today while watching...

25 July, 2017

My recent discussions about adoption of Product Lifecycle Management in different segments of manufacturing industries made me think that status...

6 February, 2019

Engineering.com article A Solidworks user look at Onshape brought my PDM twisted mind again to what I call CAD version of Turgenev’s...

30 August, 2010

I’m continuing discussions about PDM vs. PLM differences. I’d encourage you to take a look on my previous two posts...

4 November, 2015

Part numbers. This is probably one of the most discussed topic in manufacturing and related software domains. How to define...

3 February, 2014

My attention was caught this weekend by thedailybeast article with funny title – Why Big Data Doesn’t Live up to...

Blogroll

To the top