A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Manufacturer Priorities and PLM Integration Lock

Manufacturer Priorities and PLM Integration Lock
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
21 March, 2010 | 2 min for reading

I have chance to listed AMR’s Mike Burket interview during Siemens PLM Innovation Summit. It seems to me as a very interesting talk and slides about current PLM priorities. You can see it on this link. Thanks Dora Smith for this nice blog post, video and slides. One of the key requirements coming from manufacturers today are around cost reduction, better integration operation and product development as well as improvements in a supply value chain.

I counted two issues that, in my view, can be considered as very old requirements and demanded by many customers long time:
1. Design to Manufacturing Processes
2. Supporting of segmentation in Supply Chain.

On the one side, you can think about them as two separate issues. However, these two issues share one common fundamental problem of PLM systems. The problem is how to organize  integrated cross organizational processes. If you will take a look on the following slide presented by Mike, the need for integration is something that I see as a must requirement to link demand insight, product development and supply networks.

Listening Mike it becomes almost clear that process integration will become the next PLM challenge. However, here is my point. Unfortunately, integration is a very expensive job. All integrated projects I know, took a lot of time, resources and, in my view, doesn’t fit IT budgets. The issue of reduced IT budgets makes this problem even more important and critical. Many of today’s PLM integrated projects were possible only due to result of long and dedicated work done by vendors, services providers and organizations.

What is my conclusion? There is no magic outside of powerpoint slides. Integration is hard. Nobody can do it easy today. Big PLM systems provide a comprehensive product development environment, but they are not adaptable for lean cross-organizational process integration. How to find a way to reduce PLM integrated project cost and improve the agility of product development environment? This is sounds as a deadlock and the biggest challenge for manufacturers and PLM vendors in coming future.

Just my opinion.
Best, Oleg

Share

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
11 June, 2015

  Version control is one of the most important function in PDM. Regardless on what type of data you are managing,...

24 April, 2015

Few months ago, I speculated if Box can become a platform for PLM. Navigate to my previous article to read more...

23 December, 2010

People making software sometimes get excited about appliance. There is something magical in the way appliance can solve a problem....

5 January, 2010

Last year I had chance to talk about social aspects of PLM with Chris Williams from Vuuch.com. Moving enterprise software...

31 October, 2018

PLM market is tough when it comes to small and medium manufacturing companies. In my memory I have multiple attempts...

15 May, 2009

I think everybody cares about Bill of Materials. This is quite fundamental for everything we do in Product Lifecycle Management....

5 August, 2010

It becomes very common to use Wikipedia for most research projects. It becomes an ultimate source of information open for everybody....

3 February, 2022

For many manufacturers, ensuring the security and reliability of their supply chains is a top priority these days. However, it...

8 January, 2009

While looking at the amazing development of 3D Gaming Technologies recently , I’ve been wondering – is it possible to...

Blogroll

To the top