A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Manufacturer Priorities and PLM Integration Lock

Manufacturer Priorities and PLM Integration Lock
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
21 March, 2010 | 2 min for reading

I have chance to listed AMR’s Mike Burket interview during Siemens PLM Innovation Summit. It seems to me as a very interesting talk and slides about current PLM priorities. You can see it on this link. Thanks Dora Smith for this nice blog post, video and slides. One of the key requirements coming from manufacturers today are around cost reduction, better integration operation and product development as well as improvements in a supply value chain.

I counted two issues that, in my view, can be considered as very old requirements and demanded by many customers long time:
1. Design to Manufacturing Processes
2. Supporting of segmentation in Supply Chain.

On the one side, you can think about them as two separate issues. However, these two issues share one common fundamental problem of PLM systems. The problem is how to organize  integrated cross organizational processes. If you will take a look on the following slide presented by Mike, the need for integration is something that I see as a must requirement to link demand insight, product development and supply networks.

Listening Mike it becomes almost clear that process integration will become the next PLM challenge. However, here is my point. Unfortunately, integration is a very expensive job. All integrated projects I know, took a lot of time, resources and, in my view, doesn’t fit IT budgets. The issue of reduced IT budgets makes this problem even more important and critical. Many of today’s PLM integrated projects were possible only due to result of long and dedicated work done by vendors, services providers and organizations.

What is my conclusion? There is no magic outside of powerpoint slides. Integration is hard. Nobody can do it easy today. Big PLM systems provide a comprehensive product development environment, but they are not adaptable for lean cross-organizational process integration. How to find a way to reduce PLM integrated project cost and improve the agility of product development environment? This is sounds as a deadlock and the biggest challenge for manufacturers and PLM vendors in coming future.

Just my opinion.
Best, Oleg

Share

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
7 May, 2023

Earlier this week, I attended PLM Roadmap, a CIMdata event. I gave it a preview in my earlier article including...

4 March, 2015

  My yesterday post – Will cloud CAD inherit data interoperability problem? raised few interesting discussion about cloud data management...

13 July, 2009

There are a lot of buzzes now debating future business models of “Free”. I had chance to read Chris Anderson...

18 April, 2019

I’m continuing to share my favorite moments of COFES 2019 I attended last week. One of them is Eric Anderson’s...

13 January, 2022

Has your business fully adopted cloud-based CAD? While the technology has been around for more than a decade, the jury...

24 May, 2010

An interesting post was published by Luna-Tech research about the Business Process Management redefinition. Only few years ago, PLM was...

3 December, 2018

One of the topics of my interest is to compare between PLM and BIM. Let me put a disclaimer from...

6 January, 2025

Have you ever been in a situation where a company proudly implements a PLM (Product Lifecycle Management) software, only to...

25 May, 2018

I remember CEO of one large  company saying that he is not afraid of competition from usual suspects – large...

Blogroll

To the top