A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Manufacturer Priorities and PLM Integration Lock

Manufacturer Priorities and PLM Integration Lock
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
21 March, 2010 | 2 min for reading

I have chance to listed AMR’s Mike Burket interview during Siemens PLM Innovation Summit. It seems to me as a very interesting talk and slides about current PLM priorities. You can see it on this link. Thanks Dora Smith for this nice blog post, video and slides. One of the key requirements coming from manufacturers today are around cost reduction, better integration operation and product development as well as improvements in a supply value chain.

I counted two issues that, in my view, can be considered as very old requirements and demanded by many customers long time:
1. Design to Manufacturing Processes
2. Supporting of segmentation in Supply Chain.

On the one side, you can think about them as two separate issues. However, these two issues share one common fundamental problem of PLM systems. The problem is how to organize  integrated cross organizational processes. If you will take a look on the following slide presented by Mike, the need for integration is something that I see as a must requirement to link demand insight, product development and supply networks.

Listening Mike it becomes almost clear that process integration will become the next PLM challenge. However, here is my point. Unfortunately, integration is a very expensive job. All integrated projects I know, took a lot of time, resources and, in my view, doesn’t fit IT budgets. The issue of reduced IT budgets makes this problem even more important and critical. Many of today’s PLM integrated projects were possible only due to result of long and dedicated work done by vendors, services providers and organizations.

What is my conclusion? There is no magic outside of powerpoint slides. Integration is hard. Nobody can do it easy today. Big PLM systems provide a comprehensive product development environment, but they are not adaptable for lean cross-organizational process integration. How to find a way to reduce PLM integrated project cost and improve the agility of product development environment? This is sounds as a deadlock and the biggest challenge for manufacturers and PLM vendors in coming future.

Just my opinion.
Best, Oleg

Share

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
20 June, 2016

Cloud applications are getting better these days. However, most of existing mainstream engineering applications are still using files to store...

20 February, 2014

Business is going global. It is not only for large manufacturing companies these days. As a result of cost pressure...

17 November, 2011

Cloud big time… It is probably coming to General Motors. Google is fighting against Microsoft to supply 100’00 license deal...

24 March, 2024

I’m heading to CIMdata Industry and Market Vendor Forum 2024 in Ann Arbor later this week. The annual forum is...

4 December, 2008

Jos Voskuil is blogging about ERP alternative for PLM. This is quite interesting question that can be split into two...

3 March, 2019

Digital transformation and machine learning is coming to us from every possible and, sometimes, very unexpected direction. Over the weekend, my attention...

15 March, 2022

Manufacturing companies are under pressure to transform their operations to stay competitive. It includes changes in business models, turning data...

31 March, 2024

Last week, I had the opportunity of attending the CIMdata Industry and Market Forum in Ann Arbor, MI. This annual...

14 April, 2016

Manufacturing companies are owning large volumes of engineering data in CAD files, PDF and other formats derivatives from design. One...

Blogroll

To the top