A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM Gaps and Social Software Liquid

PLM Gaps and Social Software Liquid
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
10 May, 2010 | 2 min for reading

I’m getting back to my thoughts related to Social Software and Product Lifecycle Management. Jim Brown defined the role of Social Software as an intelligent network for PLM in his last post. It turns me back to one of my previous posts-  PLM and Social Tool: The Odd Couple. I’ve seen the potential entrance of social tools into PLM space as something that can disrupt PLM and change status-quo of current products. In my view, there are three fundamental gaps in PLM that need to be fixed (not filled) by Social software.

Integration
This one was mentioned by Jim in his post. Integration is long time PLM gaps and problem. Vendors gave up and move this problem to partners, service providers and customers. It is nice to think, Social Software will magically solve this problem. However, I don’t think it will happen. Integration in PLM related to the wrong technological assumptions and implies lots of manual procedures and hand-wiring to make it work.

Openness
This one is extremely important to make PLM and Social working together. Currently, PLM tools see openness as “another API call” or “export/import” function. In my view, it should be more. I’d bring self-descriptiveness as the most important change in PLM openness state of mind. PLM need to make data discoverable in the same way, web is doing it today.

Cost of Change
Last, but not least. The biggest problem with all PLM software these days is a huge cost of change required to make any modification with PLM implementation. It won’t work well and prevent integration with social tools. This problem needs to be fixed.

So, what is my conclusion today? Will Social Software fill gaps in Product Lifecycle Management? I think, this is a challenging question. PLM vendors are trying to apply Social software principles and ideas to come with new products and technologies in this space. I think PLM need to fix gaps and don’t fill it with Social Liquid. Social tools are not universal fixing solution for enterprise software like ERP, PLM or CRM. I don’t see social tools as “yet another communication protocol”. Social tools can take a role of next collaborative technologies for enterprise and change this world. I’m thinking about the path – Collaborative PDM, Collaborative Business Processes in PLM and finally Social Collaboration. There is certain potential here and it will be interesting to watch the development of this in the next couple of years.

Just my thoughts…
Best, Oleg

Share

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
25 February, 2010

I’m continuing to discuss various aspects of PLM on the Cloud and SaaS. The issue I wanted to discuss today...

6 February, 2018

I’m attending SOLIDWORKS Word this week in sunny Los Angeles. It is an annual pilgrimage of Solidworks users from all...

10 November, 2010

I spent my yesterday on Dassault Systems Customer conference (DSCC 2010). I had a chance to talk with DS executives...

5 August, 2012

I’m spending this weekend on Cape Cod with my family. When hiding from active afternoon sun, I stumble on blog...

16 September, 2019

Education and information sharing about engineering and manufacturing software are one of the things that don’t let me sleep at...

15 August, 2012

Social is a magic word many people use nowadays. After social networks “grand-success”, many people in PLM industry are thinking...

31 October, 2014

Data has tremendous value for any manufacturing organization. Nobody can dispute that. One of value propositions of PLM is to...

29 July, 2021

Usually, we speak about how PLM systems help to manage the lifecycle of products. Let’s turn things upside down today...

3 December, 2022

PLM adoption is hard. The history of PLM projects start as engineering projects and, unfortunately, struggles with many aspects related...

Blogroll

To the top