A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM Gaps and Social Software Liquid

PLM Gaps and Social Software Liquid
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
10 May, 2010 | 2 min for reading

I’m getting back to my thoughts related to Social Software and Product Lifecycle Management. Jim Brown defined the role of Social Software as an intelligent network for PLM in his last post. It turns me back to one of my previous posts-  PLM and Social Tool: The Odd Couple. I’ve seen the potential entrance of social tools into PLM space as something that can disrupt PLM and change status-quo of current products. In my view, there are three fundamental gaps in PLM that need to be fixed (not filled) by Social software.

Integration
This one was mentioned by Jim in his post. Integration is long time PLM gaps and problem. Vendors gave up and move this problem to partners, service providers and customers. It is nice to think, Social Software will magically solve this problem. However, I don’t think it will happen. Integration in PLM related to the wrong technological assumptions and implies lots of manual procedures and hand-wiring to make it work.

Openness
This one is extremely important to make PLM and Social working together. Currently, PLM tools see openness as “another API call” or “export/import” function. In my view, it should be more. I’d bring self-descriptiveness as the most important change in PLM openness state of mind. PLM need to make data discoverable in the same way, web is doing it today.

Cost of Change
Last, but not least. The biggest problem with all PLM software these days is a huge cost of change required to make any modification with PLM implementation. It won’t work well and prevent integration with social tools. This problem needs to be fixed.

So, what is my conclusion today? Will Social Software fill gaps in Product Lifecycle Management? I think, this is a challenging question. PLM vendors are trying to apply Social software principles and ideas to come with new products and technologies in this space. I think PLM need to fix gaps and don’t fill it with Social Liquid. Social tools are not universal fixing solution for enterprise software like ERP, PLM or CRM. I don’t see social tools as “yet another communication protocol”. Social tools can take a role of next collaborative technologies for enterprise and change this world. I’m thinking about the path – Collaborative PDM, Collaborative Business Processes in PLM and finally Social Collaboration. There is certain potential here and it will be interesting to watch the development of this in the next couple of years.

Just my thoughts…
Best, Oleg

Share

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
3 December, 2023

In today’s fast-paced business landscape, digital transformation is a buzzword that’s hard to escape. Many companies are reevaluating their processes...

2 May, 2019

One of the most complicated questions when selling PLM is to prove ROI. The topic was debated so much in...

24 October, 2011

I want to continue the topic I started in my previous posts – PLM for SME (Small to Medium Enterprise)....

17 February, 2025

For the past 20 years, the smartphone has revolutionized the way we live, work, and communicate. It is an incredibly...

18 July, 2013

There is one project in data management everybody tries to avoid: legacy data import. It’s one of the most complicated,...

16 December, 2020

PTC is full speed ahead to the future of SaaS and this is very encouraging confirmation of the industry moving...

7 July, 2016

Earlier this year I shared some of my thoughts how machine learning can be used to improve the quality and...

16 December, 2014

My post few days about PLM software replacement cycle turned into discussion about the way companies are implementing and maintaining PLM...

20 February, 2012

I’d like to continue my “multi-CAD and PDM” story. If you had no chance to read my yesterday post The...

Blogroll

To the top