A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM Gaps and Social Software Liquid

PLM Gaps and Social Software Liquid
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
10 May, 2010 | 2 min for reading

I’m getting back to my thoughts related to Social Software and Product Lifecycle Management. Jim Brown defined the role of Social Software as an intelligent network for PLM in his last post. It turns me back to one of my previous posts-  PLM and Social Tool: The Odd Couple. I’ve seen the potential entrance of social tools into PLM space as something that can disrupt PLM and change status-quo of current products. In my view, there are three fundamental gaps in PLM that need to be fixed (not filled) by Social software.

Integration
This one was mentioned by Jim in his post. Integration is long time PLM gaps and problem. Vendors gave up and move this problem to partners, service providers and customers. It is nice to think, Social Software will magically solve this problem. However, I don’t think it will happen. Integration in PLM related to the wrong technological assumptions and implies lots of manual procedures and hand-wiring to make it work.

Openness
This one is extremely important to make PLM and Social working together. Currently, PLM tools see openness as “another API call” or “export/import” function. In my view, it should be more. I’d bring self-descriptiveness as the most important change in PLM openness state of mind. PLM need to make data discoverable in the same way, web is doing it today.

Cost of Change
Last, but not least. The biggest problem with all PLM software these days is a huge cost of change required to make any modification with PLM implementation. It won’t work well and prevent integration with social tools. This problem needs to be fixed.

So, what is my conclusion today? Will Social Software fill gaps in Product Lifecycle Management? I think, this is a challenging question. PLM vendors are trying to apply Social software principles and ideas to come with new products and technologies in this space. I think PLM need to fix gaps and don’t fill it with Social Liquid. Social tools are not universal fixing solution for enterprise software like ERP, PLM or CRM. I don’t see social tools as “yet another communication protocol”. Social tools can take a role of next collaborative technologies for enterprise and change this world. I’m thinking about the path – Collaborative PDM, Collaborative Business Processes in PLM and finally Social Collaboration. There is certain potential here and it will be interesting to watch the development of this in the next couple of years.

Just my thoughts…
Best, Oleg

Share

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
2 August, 2025

Earlier this week, my attention was caught by Forrester Wave report and debates around this. Thanks for Michael Finocchiaro and...

27 April, 2015

PLM technologies and products went through many changes for the last two decades. If you long timer in PLM industry, you...

19 November, 2023

To continue sharing what I learned at AU2023 earlier this week, in this article I want to speak about Design...

24 June, 2023

What is the biggest value asset of your brand? Two decades ago, I attended a management couch session where the...

15 January, 2009

Even though, 2008 was year of financial crisis and instability, I still regard it as a remarkable year for the...

30 December, 2016

Few days ago, I my attention was caught by Allan Behrens’ tweet  with a very provoking question about what changed...

14 October, 2013

Everybody speaks today about big data. It is probably one of the most overhyped and confused terms. It goes everywhere...

12 August, 2015

  Seriously, how do you take your coffee (err… PLM)? I might like my PLM with free upgrade service and...

24 February, 2017

It has been almost 5 years since Autodesk turned the switch “PLM cloud” on. Tech-clarity blog – Autodesk’s announced PLM...

Blogroll

To the top