A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM, Search and Findability

PLM, Search and Findability
Oleg
Oleg
20 May, 2013 | 2 min for reading

Searching for information is a tricky thing. Search may sounds as a simple operation, but in fact,  it is translated to a complex computational, information and organizational task. Search isn’t a new problem. Lots of work was done in this domain for the last 20 years. Google clearly changed a consumer perception about internet search. Google “lady Gaga” and in less than a second you will have all relevant internet information about Lady Gaga.

However, searching inside of corporate data is different. What works for “lady Gaga” type of search, doesn’t work for MPR-345000 type of search for product information, part numbers, documents in SharePoints, emails, intranet sites and other enterprise data sources. It is complicated and daunting task. Sometimes, it even goes beyond of what is most important – it is about where to search. During my previous work at Inforbix, I found customers are usually very confused about searching information. They think about search as an easy and complicated thing at the same time and usually blame IT for not bringing a right solution to solve the problem of search.

I’ve been looking on materials coming from Enterprise Search Europe 2013 conference earlier this week. looking on Enterprise Search and Findability Survey 2013 published by FINDWISE and presented by Kristian Norling few weeks ago. The following two slides caught my special attention. It speaks about what are the obstacles to find the right information. Take a look on the following statistics:

According to the research, there are top 5 obstacles – we do wrong tagging, we don’t know where to search, tools are not perfect as well as tagging made by tools. The last one is even more interesting – we don’t know what to look for.

What is my conclusion? Information search is a complicated, but fascinating topic. For the last few years CAD and PLM vendors started to put more emphasis in order to improve their way to search and actually find the information. However, solving the problem of a single tool is still not enough. Even if company has PLM/PDM system in place, the information usually located in disparate sources. As we learn from the research, the problem is going much beyond searching for a specific set of keywords – data sources are not defined and how to search for right data is not clear as well. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
21 December, 2010

I’ve been discussing with colleagues Gartner’s Predict 2011: Manufacturer Revamp and Enhance Product Lifecycle Management strategies. Without Gartner’s subscription, you...

29 November, 2016

PLM industry is in a full swing to promote new concepts – digital thread and digital twin. While digital term by itself...

8 March, 2010

Old, but very interesting blog post by Thomas Otter from Gartner made me think more about the future of PLM...

24 March, 2024

Combining multiple systems in manufacturing sector to work together is always a complex thing to do. In the engineering and...

24 August, 2024

I often hear the statement, “Product Lifecycle Management is a journey.” Once you start a PLM journey in your company,...

27 January, 2017

Unless you lived under the rock for the last few years, you’ve heard words IaaS, PaaS and SaaS at least...

3 February, 2012

If you followed my comments on one of previous posts – Cloud PLM and IT Basic Instincts, I promised to...

7 February, 2014

Few years ago, I got a problem with automatic transmission of our Honda Odyssey. The funny part of the story...

12 March, 2010

I was reading SolidSmack’s post about how to manage versions of the assemblies. Creating versions of drawing and models is...

Blogroll

To the top