A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Business As Usual Is Not An Option For Manufacturers

Business As Usual Is Not An Option For Manufacturers
Oleg
Oleg
26 May, 2010 | 1 min for reading

An interesting research done by Economist Intelligence Unit, sponsored by Siemens PLM Software and Microsoft. You can get this report via this link. The fundamental outcome of the report is as following is that despite general optimism, manufacturers are very concerned about the future of their business and the overall impact.

  • Producers are confident in their ability to innovate—a central aspect of high-value manufacturing—but most acknowledge they will have to continue to boost their innovative capabilities. Over the past year, 40% increased their investments in research and development, while 19% took on board more highly skilled workers.
  • However, manufacturers cite some big obstacles to innovation and new product and service development, including costs (53% of respondents), uncertainty about customer demand (39%) and lack of appropriate in-house skills (38%). To overcome some of these hurdles, many are prepared to partner in the coming year: with suppliers (57%), large corporate clients (42%), technology providers (39%) and consumers (22%).
  • Almost one in five is even prepared to partner with a rival, to share resources in the face of competition, and two-thirds say that they are already actively engaged in “open innovation”, sharing ideas with third parties rather than trying to develop them entirely in-house.
  • Many manufacturers (36% of the survey sample) are now developing products for the green market, or making their processes more eco-friendly. In some cases, this is driven by consumer demand; in others by regulatory pressure.

What, in my view, software vendors can take from this? Manufacturers will continue to be challenged and will be interested to change the way they are doing business. The most important aspect is control over the product cost and material cost. To have a solution, here can be an interesting opportunity. In the meantime, there is nothing on the horizon.

Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
16 April, 2012

COFES 2012 became special to me. It is almost four years since I started my daily blogging on Daily PLM...

12 November, 2012

PLM implementation requires the change. I’m sure you had a chance to hear about it more than one times. The...

13 May, 2013

The discussion around Google Glass is heating up. Google was very transparent by rolling out Google Glasses and providing lots...

4 November, 2015

Part numbers. This is probably one of the most discussed topic in manufacturing and related software domains. How to define...

27 August, 2013

The cloud trend is shifting the direction. Only few years ago, we’ve been saying cloud focus is on consumer applications...

24 August, 2018

I’m taking some time off with my family, so please excuse me for irregular blogging this week. My attention was...

6 October, 2010

Yesterday, I touched a topic of connection between CAD and PLM. The discussion started by Peter Schroer of Aras and...

20 April, 2025

What will it take to build intelligent, connected, and truly autonomous product lifecycle systems? I attended ACE 2025, a community...

19 March, 2015

Things are moving fast these days. Vendors are speeding up their plans to catch up with new development. The changes...

Blogroll

To the top