A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Business As Usual Is Not An Option For Manufacturers

Business As Usual Is Not An Option For Manufacturers
Oleg
Oleg
26 May, 2010 | 1 min for reading

An interesting research done by Economist Intelligence Unit, sponsored by Siemens PLM Software and Microsoft. You can get this report via this link. The fundamental outcome of the report is as following is that despite general optimism, manufacturers are very concerned about the future of their business and the overall impact.

  • Producers are confident in their ability to innovate—a central aspect of high-value manufacturing—but most acknowledge they will have to continue to boost their innovative capabilities. Over the past year, 40% increased their investments in research and development, while 19% took on board more highly skilled workers.
  • However, manufacturers cite some big obstacles to innovation and new product and service development, including costs (53% of respondents), uncertainty about customer demand (39%) and lack of appropriate in-house skills (38%). To overcome some of these hurdles, many are prepared to partner in the coming year: with suppliers (57%), large corporate clients (42%), technology providers (39%) and consumers (22%).
  • Almost one in five is even prepared to partner with a rival, to share resources in the face of competition, and two-thirds say that they are already actively engaged in “open innovation”, sharing ideas with third parties rather than trying to develop them entirely in-house.
  • Many manufacturers (36% of the survey sample) are now developing products for the green market, or making their processes more eco-friendly. In some cases, this is driven by consumer demand; in others by regulatory pressure.

What, in my view, software vendors can take from this? Manufacturers will continue to be challenged and will be interested to change the way they are doing business. The most important aspect is control over the product cost and material cost. To have a solution, here can be an interesting opportunity. In the meantime, there is nothing on the horizon.

Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
10 December, 2023

The credit for the picture above goes to Martin Eigner book about System Lifecycle Management. I’d like to continue the...

12 February, 2009

I’d like to come to raise the idea of visual WIKI. This is a possible way to make PLM more...

27 November, 2011

The announcement made by Dassault System last week, made me think about a huge distance CAD industry passed for the...

13 July, 2024

When embarking on a Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) project, selecting the right vendor is critical. To ensure your PLM system...

4 December, 2009

Short question – what do you think about the quality of data in your PLM solution? I think the data...

6 February, 2023

Are you seeking an efficient, cost-effective solution for managing product lifecycle information or searching for a way to integrate multiple...

26 September, 2017

Do you remember discussions about true and fake clouds a few years ago? It was a trend among PLM and...

25 March, 2013

I want to continue the theme of disruption started in my post last week. I can see two major forces...

22 August, 2021

Data is taking a central stage in everything that businesses do these days. You can hear about digital strategies and...

Blogroll

To the top