A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Business As Usual Is Not An Option For Manufacturers

Business As Usual Is Not An Option For Manufacturers
Oleg
Oleg
26 May, 2010 | 1 min for reading

An interesting research done by Economist Intelligence Unit, sponsored by Siemens PLM Software and Microsoft. You can get this report via this link. The fundamental outcome of the report is as following is that despite general optimism, manufacturers are very concerned about the future of their business and the overall impact.

  • Producers are confident in their ability to innovate—a central aspect of high-value manufacturing—but most acknowledge they will have to continue to boost their innovative capabilities. Over the past year, 40% increased their investments in research and development, while 19% took on board more highly skilled workers.
  • However, manufacturers cite some big obstacles to innovation and new product and service development, including costs (53% of respondents), uncertainty about customer demand (39%) and lack of appropriate in-house skills (38%). To overcome some of these hurdles, many are prepared to partner in the coming year: with suppliers (57%), large corporate clients (42%), technology providers (39%) and consumers (22%).
  • Almost one in five is even prepared to partner with a rival, to share resources in the face of competition, and two-thirds say that they are already actively engaged in “open innovation”, sharing ideas with third parties rather than trying to develop them entirely in-house.
  • Many manufacturers (36% of the survey sample) are now developing products for the green market, or making their processes more eco-friendly. In some cases, this is driven by consumer demand; in others by regulatory pressure.

What, in my view, software vendors can take from this? Manufacturers will continue to be challenged and will be interested to change the way they are doing business. The most important aspect is control over the product cost and material cost. To have a solution, here can be an interesting opportunity. In the meantime, there is nothing on the horizon.

Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
28 June, 2018

Manufacturing is transforming. New business models, new products, new technologies. Manufacturing is becoming decentralized and connected. PLM companies are swimming...

18 March, 2013

Disruptive technologies and solutions. This is beloved topic by bloggers, analysts and vendors. We like to talk about how disruption...

5 February, 2012

Social is one of the topics I’m discussing frequently on my blog. Today, I would like to take a different...

7 April, 2018

Earlier this week Stan Przybylinski of CIMdata presented 2018 PLM market analysis results at CIMdata 2018 industry and market forum...

5 August, 2012

I’m spending this weekend on Cape Cod with my family. When hiding from active afternoon sun, I stumble on blog...

16 April, 2021

A very interesting PLM news came out yesterday. Autodesk signed an agreement to acquire Toronto-based Upchain. You can read some...

4 November, 2019

PLM needs a paradigm shift. For the last two decades of PLM development, customers and vendors gathered tons of experience...

12 January, 2016

One of my best blogging buddies in product lifecycle management and President of Lifecycle Insight Chad Jackson open 2016 with...

18 March, 2014

How to integrated PLM and ERP? This is such an old topic. I’ve been discussing it on the blog so...

Blogroll

To the top