A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM Competition and “MEH”?

PLM Competition and “MEH”?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
11 June, 2010 | 2 min for reading

I’ve been reading SolidSmack postJim Heppelmann. Dassault Arrogant Competition. Siemens Invisible. This post made me think more about competition.  Competition is very important and this is a part of any healthy industry. So, I want to suggest a short discussion about PLM competition and modern competitive strategies. The way companies behave, can show what are their motto, believes, technological position.

Blue Ocean Strategies
If you haven’t had chance to read this book, I highly recommend you to do so. In my view, it can be considered as a modern “bible of competition”. You can find lots of interesting examples from the past and present about how companies managed their competitive strategies. The blue ocean metaphor explains the world of competition-less, where companies are focused on untapped market places, new opportunity for growths and compare it with the dominant competition strategy (red-ocean) of finding ways to cut costs and growth by taking a market share from competition.

MEH and Competition
Relax, ‘MEH’ is not a new PLM  TLA (three letter acronym) for a new super technology that will outperform all other competitors. Take a look in urban dictionary definition of “meh”. It states for “Indifference; to be used when one simply does not care.” It seems to me, MEH is going to be a new way to compete in the world when software will be available for PULL and vendors will stop PUSHING it to potential customers. I want to credit Steven Arnold KMWorld article about Google and their MEH strategy in mobile phone space. Time will show if Android will be able to outperform iPhone and RIM. This is an interesting perspective, though.

PLM Competition
PLM and associated space of CAD, CAM, CAE is not simple from a competition standpoint. In my view, the most problematic aspects of PLM-related competition are customer’s lock-in on software, sotware versions, data formats. Cost of change (or switch to a competitor’s solution) is another thing that plays as a competitive factor. On the other side, customers are starting to be tired of such competition and looking for alternatives to get the job done.

What is my short conclusion today? I think, PLM market is too focused on competition and less focused on customers. To be able to listen to customers is probably the first tool to win a competition game. PLM competition needs to learn from how to win over customers and not over competitors. This is not a simple shift. However, this is one that needs to be done to make PLM associated industry stronger.

Just my thoughts..
Best, Oleg

Share

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
9 September, 2014

Have you heard about “makers”? If you are in manufacturing business, you probably should pay attention to that. You may...

22 January, 2015

One of the most complicated parts of any PLM implementation is data modeling. Depends on PLM vendor, product and technology,...

15 December, 2016

Connectivity is changing demands of manufacturing systems about software. A decade ago, the top concern was how to control data....

15 January, 2023

Is cloud PLM becoming mainstream for enterprise applications? The year 2022 was an interesting year in the cloud and SaaS...

15 December, 2014

There is no shortage of talks about IoT these days. CAD and PLM vendors included. While each company is developing...

8 June, 2010

Usually, when we are discussing various aspects of software, we are spending lot of time talking about technologies. However, I...

24 May, 2010

An interesting post was published by Luna-Tech research about the Business Process Management redefinition. Only few years ago, PLM was...

8 October, 2023

Early this week, I attended TechSoft 3D Boston Summit. If you’re not familiar with TechSoft 3D, check them out. It...

24 July, 2014

Cool factor is trending in software these days. The time when software was ugly is probably in the past. Everyone...

Blogroll

To the top