A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM, Collaborative Sandbox and Facebook Pills

PLM, Collaborative Sandbox and Facebook Pills
Oleg
Oleg
29 July, 2010 | 3 min for reading

What do you think is the most adopted mainstream collaboration tool? My conclusion is that most of the companies are running by email these days. Email is the number one application everybody uses to collaborate, decide and communicate a decision to other people. People are practically collaborating, deciding and acting on emails.

PLM and Collaborative Sandbox
Collaboration is very important for product development. Software vendors recognized it long time ago when started to play their “collaborative game”. Collaborative PDM. Collaborative PLM. What all these initiatives and products were about? I think, all these products were about to create a collaborative sandbox where people can work together. In these collaborative sandboxes kids (oops… engineers, managers and super-managers) are playing in exchanging information and making decisions. However, is it really so? What most of the companies are using to collaborate? I guess, they are using email. Therefore, each time PDM, PLM, BPM or any other “collaborative software” were coming with a new product, a customer’s question was – can you support email?

Social Sandbox Pills
The hype of last 2-3 years is social software. The idea behind social is to create a better place to collaborate. You know better who are the people you need to contact, get information, exchange opinion and, at the end – make a decision. So, we are going to replace our email collaboration with a new… social collaboration? Really? So, Facebook will be the next collaborative tool? Kind a social sandbox? You need to read Jim Brown’s “Why Does Facebook Fail for product development“?  So, using my collaborative sandbox analogy, we are going to move from the “email sandbox” to the “facebook sandbox”. Do you think it will help to collaborate in a better way?

Collaboration Is About Toys in A Sandbox
How to collaborate effectively? In my view, you need to have good tools. Like in a sandbox, if you are a right set of toys, you will be able to create amazing things. Facebook allows you to play with pictures, videos and messages. These are ultimate Facebook’s toys. When we collaborate in a company, most of us are playing with email and attachments. Can we improve it by moving into Facebook’s sandbox? To have an access to the right set of tools from the new social sandbox is the most critical part of a successful social collaboration. In most of the cases these tools are already in place – design, engineering and manufacturing tools. These tools will allow you to collaborate with a right context.

What is my conclusion today? There are two important element of collaboration – place to collaboration (sandbox) and context we need to collaborate (toys). My hunch is that most of the social collaboration discussions are about sandbox today. We are too much focused on where we are going to play. We are not focusing about how to have a right context to collaborate with. Like having pictures, videos, messages and syndication of all these things is important for Facebook’s success, to have a right content to collaborate is important for a successful product development collaboration. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
20 April, 2024

A few articles I published on the OpenBOM blog about organizing data before starting PLM implementations and navigating single source...

4 February, 2010

This short prompt today was driven by presentation on SolidWorks World 2010. What is the evolution path of PLM? For...

20 February, 2012

I’m heading to Munich tomorrow to attend PLM Innovation 2012 conference. I’m looking forward to many discussions and meetings. One...

7 October, 2014

Processes and workflows is a big topic in PLM. If you think about PLM as a way to manage a...

18 June, 2015

Enterprise integration is a messy space. It is always complex – applications, databases, new and legacy systems, complexity of requirements....

5 November, 2010

Yesterday, I had the unique opportunity to participate in the webinar with a very intriguing name – Why Hasn’t PLM...

8 June, 2015

The adoption of PLM is a tricky question. I use a term PLM for the moment, to describe both tools...

29 October, 2014

I had a chance to attend MassChallenge Awards event tonight at Boston Convention Center. For those of your who is...

1 June, 2010

I already had chance to mention Geoffrey Moore presentation during Google’s Atmosphere 2010 event. One of the things he mentioned...

Blogroll

To the top