A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

CAD Strategies: Unified Or Diversified?

CAD Strategies: Unified Or Diversified?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
10 August, 2010 | 3 min for reading

In my view, summer time is good for vacations, research papers and strategic projects. During the summer, you are always have an excuse to stop, think and do something unusual. This is also time to clean up emails and feeds. I read a new research paper just published by Jim Brown of TechClarity: Consolidating CAD – Strategic Advantages at Reduced Cost. I found it interesting. Jim’s conclusion is simple – consolidate your CADs, cut cost, reduce complexity, improve collaboration. It sounds very straightforward and simple. Nevertheless, some latest publications made me think that such a decision might be more complex. I’d like to propose to discuss it more and take a look on different perspectives of CAD unification decision.

Historical Status Quo

The status quo of engineering and manufacturing companies these days is multiple CAD systems. For different reasons, people are using different CADs. Usually, it was a result of historical decisions, old/new projects, M&A activities and some others. Large OEMs have a tendency to choose different CAD system also due to decisions taken by divisions. Suppliers are influenced by their work for multiple OEMs and also can consider various CAD options as sometime very reliable. In addition, cost factor is another reason why organizations can make their decision to diversify CAD packages.

Technological Trends

I can identify several important trends that can influence customer decision related to CAD system usage: (1) 3D direct modeling; (2) Openness; (3) Cloud.

3D Direct modeling
During last few years, we have seen a significant innovative activity so-called direct 3D modeling vs. parametric design. New and existing companies focused on direct 3D modeling drove established vendors to make acquisitions or made a significant development in this space.

Openness
This is not a completely new trend. Openness and interoperability have been very popular many years. My view, is that during the past couple of years, there is a renaissance of "openness discussion" driven by web development and open source related activities.

Cloud
This is another very popular trend. What will happen when/if CAD will be moving to the cloud? How to leverage cloud technology? There are lots of discussions about this topic recently happened in blogs, industry and vendor’s conferences.

PTC and the Future of MCAD
We are all waiting for PTC Lightning strike in October. A good review of what PTC is thinking about made by SolidSmack. Navigate to this link. Also, take a look on the following slide from PTC about this project – The Right Solution For Every User.

We don’t know for sure, what PTC is preparing as part of their new project. However, I can see a glimpse of thinking about tools’ diversification. You can read some "un-answered" questions about this project in Deelip’sblog.

SpaceClaim 3D – Not Only For Engineers
Navigate to the following link – SpaceClaim 2010 Externds to Non-Engineering Groups. You can see a definite interest of SpaceClaim to propose more diversification into 3D CAD usage in organizations.

Conclusion and Future Thinking

The advantages of a single tool and value proposition made by Jim in his research is clear for me. However, to implement unified CAD strategy can be complicated and long process. As an alternative, CAD vendors can propose new potential solutions to solve old problems – open/free tools, cloud products, various tools’ diversification that can make customers think more about the CAD strategies.

Just my thoughts…
Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
28 April, 2019

Digitalization is one of these words that we hear more often these days. The term is used very broadly. Here...

12 January, 2015

PLM business and software vendors are transforming. Manufacturing companies are looking for new type of solutions that can give a...

6 July, 2013

Graphs are fascinating. I think, we like graphs more and more these days. I like graphs a lot because in...

3 February, 2010

In my view, we are observing the major disruption of enterprise software business models ever. Since yesterday’s post FREE and...

28 July, 2018

I thought it was only confused by Model-Based approach and terminology. I published Model-based confusion in 3D CAD and PLM article earlier...

13 November, 2022

People don’t want something really new. They want to have something they are familiar with but work differently. In today’s...

13 May, 2019

There are two things in business that you can find very hard to compete with. These are simplicity and free....

18 August, 2009

Product Lifecycle Management and Master Data Management. I had chance to raise this issue few months ago in my post...

1 February, 2012

An interesting addition to my yesterday post about technological options for cloud PLM. I was reading Amazon’s announcement that came...

Blogroll

To the top