A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Should PLM Disconnect Data from Process?

Should PLM Disconnect Data from Process?
Oleg
Oleg
27 August, 2010 | 2 min for reading

I had a chance to read an article by ebizQ related to Cordys BPM. For those who is not aware – Cordys is a relatively new outfit in the enterprise software market. The wizard name behind this company is Jan Baan. If you are a long-time citizen in the enterprise software domain, you need his first ERP company – BAAN. These days Jan Baan is very active and Cordys is one of his new babies. In his interview, Jan is discussing his long project related to decoupling of processes. The following quote seems to me interesting:

… ending the data-process dependency is easier said than done. Suppliers attempted it using extremely fat clients at one extreme and sophisticated distributed data with replication at the other.

Process Decoupling

For a very long period of time the concept of “a process needs data” were dominant. Multiple BPM vendors claimed that the only way to make BPM successful is to bring meta-data (and other data) into BPM product suites. I can agree, this strategy seems to be successful if you plan is to create integrated enterprise software suites. However, thinking more about Internet technologies and lean architectures it makes much more sense to make a disconnection of data and process.

PLM: Process vs. Data

In my view, PLM Software vendors are definitely moving towards better vertical integration. Users are asking PLM companies for a better integration between products, and PLM (and not only PLM) companies are starting to couple products and solutions together to ensure customers will spend fewer resources tailoring these solutions.

What is my conclusion? I think, enterprise software vendors can miss the dangerous point of data and process connection and interplay. When most of the enterprise companies use data to lock-in customers in their product suites, the addition of processes seems to them as a natural continuation of this strategy. The real danger of these strategies is a large complicated software products and extremely high cost of changes. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Disclaimer: I’m the co-founder and CEO of OpenBOM, a digital-thread platform providing cloud-native collaborative services including PDM, PLM, and ERP capabilities. With extensive experience in federated CAD-PDM and PLM architecture, I’m advocates for agile, open product models and cloud technologies in manufacturing. My opinion can be unintentionally biased

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
25 July, 2010

Data management is boring. Data, Numbers, Tables… Even, if I completely disagree, I guess lots of people think so. Nevertheless, even...

7 August, 2009

Dear Friends, Don’t worry, everything is okay with PLM Think Tank. This short notice is to inform that I’m going...

23 June, 2016

Unless you live under a rock, I’m sure you’ve heard about one of the largest acquisitions in tech world – Microsoft...

11 November, 2018

It’s that time of year again. Everyone who is somehow connected to Autodesk technologies and products is coming to Las...

15 September, 2014

The aim of PLM is to improve product development processes and lifecycle. One of the biggest challenges to make it...

18 March, 2011

Collaboration is one of the most overused words in Product Lifecycle Management. Even outside of PLM world, this term creates...

10 July, 2009

The following blog article by Anurag Batra drove my attention today – “Comparing BOM Structures: a multi-faceted need”. The author...

15 June, 2009

Prompt note on Amazon Kindle DX announcement. Look Kindle DX review. It includes embedded wireless support and new native PDF...

28 August, 2013

Are you familiar with 1% internet rule? It is also called 90-9-1 principle. According to this rule, only 1% of...

Blogroll

To the top