A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Should PLM Disconnect Data from Process?

Should PLM Disconnect Data from Process?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
27 August, 2010 | 2 min for reading

I had a chance to read an article byebizQ related to Cordys BPM. For those who is not aware – Cordys is a relatively new outfit in the enterprise software market. The wizard name behind this company is Jan Baan. If you are a long-time citizen in the enterprise software domain, you need his first ERP company – BAAN. These days Jan Baan is very active and Cordys is one of his new babies. In his interview, Jan is discussing his long project related to decoupling of processes. The following quote seems to me interesting:

… ending the data-process dependency is easier said than done. Suppliers attempted it using extremely fat clients at one extreme and sophisticated distributed data with replication at the other.

Process Decoupling

For a very long period of time the concept of “a process needs data” were dominant. Multiple BPM vendors claimed that the only way to make BPM successful is to bring meta-data (and other data) into BPM product suites. I can agree, this strategy seems to be successful if you plan is to create integrated enterprise software suites. However, thinking more about Internet technologies and lean architectures it makes much more sense to make a disconnection of data and process.

PLM: Process vs. Data

In my view, PLM Software vendors are definitely moving towards better vertical integration. Users are asking PLM companies for a better integration between products, and PLM (and not only PLM) companies are starting to couple products and solutions together to ensure customers will spend fewer resources tailoring these solutions.

What is my conclusion? I think, enterprise software vendors can miss the dangerous point of data and process connection and interplay. When most of the enterprise companies use data to lock-in customers in their product suites, the addition of processes seems to them as a natural continuation of this strategy. The real danger of these strategies is a large complicated software products and extremely high cost of changes. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
9 April, 2014

Connectivity is a key these days and graphs are playing key role in the development of our connectivity. It doesn’t...

13 February, 2018

How to build reliable PLM system? For long time, this topic is among the most often demanded requirement in engineering...

28 November, 2012

Last year I blogged about Google’s cloud and CAD/PLM readiness. Navigate to the following link to refresh your memories. The...

7 February, 2025

Earlier today, I had a chat with Prof. Dr. Jörg W. Fischer over his LinkedIn post saying – we are...

20 May, 2019

Verdi Ogewell, the Editor-in-Chief of VerkstadsForum PLM Magazine and ENGINEERING.com’s European correspondent publish his next PLM failure bombshells – Telecom...

13 December, 2012

PLM is all about process management. This statement comes to the play when people explain the value of PLM in...

10 October, 2013

Enterprise software business is complicated. It often comes with questions of system responsibilities and ownerships. IT usually holds primarily responsibility...

9 July, 2023

Hello everyone, the summer is in full swing. The Q2 is over and everyone is I can see how engineering...

4 February, 2019

Complexity of PLM systems and user experience is well-known problem in the world of PLM. Even all PLM vendors are...

Blogroll

To the top