A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Should PLM Disconnect Data from Process?

Should PLM Disconnect Data from Process?
Oleg
Oleg
27 August, 2010 | 2 min for reading

I had a chance to read an article by ebizQ related to Cordys BPM. For those who is not aware – Cordys is a relatively new outfit in the enterprise software market. The wizard name behind this company is Jan Baan. If you are a long-time citizen in the enterprise software domain, you need his first ERP company – BAAN. These days Jan Baan is very active and Cordys is one of his new babies. In his interview, Jan is discussing his long project related to decoupling of processes. The following quote seems to me interesting:

… ending the data-process dependency is easier said than done. Suppliers attempted it using extremely fat clients at one extreme and sophisticated distributed data with replication at the other.

Process Decoupling

For a very long period of time the concept of “a process needs data” were dominant. Multiple BPM vendors claimed that the only way to make BPM successful is to bring meta-data (and other data) into BPM product suites. I can agree, this strategy seems to be successful if you plan is to create integrated enterprise software suites. However, thinking more about Internet technologies and lean architectures it makes much more sense to make a disconnection of data and process.

PLM: Process vs. Data

In my view, PLM Software vendors are definitely moving towards better vertical integration. Users are asking PLM companies for a better integration between products, and PLM (and not only PLM) companies are starting to couple products and solutions together to ensure customers will spend fewer resources tailoring these solutions.

What is my conclusion? I think, enterprise software vendors can miss the dangerous point of data and process connection and interplay. When most of the enterprise companies use data to lock-in customers in their product suites, the addition of processes seems to them as a natural continuation of this strategy. The real danger of these strategies is a large complicated software products and extremely high cost of changes. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Disclaimer: I’m the co-founder and CEO of OpenBOM, a digital-thread platform providing cloud-native collaborative services including PDM, PLM, and ERP capabilities. With extensive experience in federated CAD-PDM and PLM architecture, I’m advocates for agile, open product models and cloud technologies in manufacturing. My opinion can be unintentionally biased

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
29 December, 2011

PLM is a costly piece of software. Software licenses, installation, implementation, support, services. All these components of PLM software make...

19 March, 2009

I wanted to get back to micro-blogs, and more specifically, to Twitter.  In one of my previous posts, I discussed...

11 April, 2014

One of the most popular topics in engineering (but not only) software ecosystem. Open vs. Close. I’ve been discussing it...

20 November, 2017

One of the things that caught my attention last week at Autodesk University 2017, was Andrew Anagnost, Autodesk CEO keynote...

7 January, 2024

The complexity is on the rise in the modern manufacturing industry and industrial companies. There are multiple dimensions of the...

19 July, 2009

Note toward future. After long Microsoft related discussion about Office 2010 and SharePoint 2010, final, and more future oriented, prompt...

5 January, 2025

“Simple” and “easy” are words that resonate universally. Albert Einstein famously said, “Make everything as simple as possible, but not...

9 September, 2011

During the past months, I’ve seen an increased amount of conversations about the future of App Store software model in...

6 May, 2009

Last month, I wrote a few posts about Bill of Materials. My interest was to investigate how to improve Bill...

Blogroll

To the top