A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Should PLM Disconnect Data from Process?

Should PLM Disconnect Data from Process?
Oleg
Oleg
27 August, 2010 | 2 min for reading

I had a chance to read an article by ebizQ related to Cordys BPM. For those who is not aware – Cordys is a relatively new outfit in the enterprise software market. The wizard name behind this company is Jan Baan. If you are a long-time citizen in the enterprise software domain, you need his first ERP company – BAAN. These days Jan Baan is very active and Cordys is one of his new babies. In his interview, Jan is discussing his long project related to decoupling of processes. The following quote seems to me interesting:

… ending the data-process dependency is easier said than done. Suppliers attempted it using extremely fat clients at one extreme and sophisticated distributed data with replication at the other.

Process Decoupling

For a very long period of time the concept of “a process needs data” were dominant. Multiple BPM vendors claimed that the only way to make BPM successful is to bring meta-data (and other data) into BPM product suites. I can agree, this strategy seems to be successful if you plan is to create integrated enterprise software suites. However, thinking more about Internet technologies and lean architectures it makes much more sense to make a disconnection of data and process.

PLM: Process vs. Data

In my view, PLM Software vendors are definitely moving towards better vertical integration. Users are asking PLM companies for a better integration between products, and PLM (and not only PLM) companies are starting to couple products and solutions together to ensure customers will spend fewer resources tailoring these solutions.

What is my conclusion? I think, enterprise software vendors can miss the dangerous point of data and process connection and interplay. When most of the enterprise companies use data to lock-in customers in their product suites, the addition of processes seems to them as a natural continuation of this strategy. The real danger of these strategies is a large complicated software products and extremely high cost of changes. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Disclaimer: I’m the co-founder and CEO of OpenBOM, a digital-thread platform providing cloud-native collaborative services including PDM, PLM, and ERP capabilities. With extensive experience in federated CAD-PDM and PLM architecture, I’m advocates for agile, open product models and cloud technologies in manufacturing. My opinion can be unintentionally biased

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
13 April, 2017

While PLM research and analytic companies are running cloud PLM surveys to understand what causes slow cloud PLM adoption, manufacturing industry...

2 September, 2011

I’m adding another post to my collection of PLM definitions. Gavlin Quinlan came with the blog post on concurrent-engineering blog...

1 January, 2016

Happy New Year to all my readers. 2015 Year was amazing and I want to thank everyone for being with...

10 March, 2010

One of the very important aspects of PLM as enterprise software is the ability to be implemented in the fast...

28 February, 2012

You are probably familiar with the following statements “beavers do what beavers do“. I’ve got the confirmation of that last...

12 February, 2016

If you ask two engineers how to solve a problem, the odds are you can finish with three different solutions....

14 December, 2015

CAD and PLM companies are in a full swing to embrace IoT technologies. Why not? IoT is probably the most...

26 August, 2014

Unbundling is an interesting trend in many industries these days. It is relatively new marketing and business activity that helps...

8 April, 2017

I’m attending COFES 2017 these days in Scottsdale, AZ. If you’re interested in engineering software – CAD, CAE, CAM, PDM,...

Blogroll

To the top