A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Stuck PLM Project and Leo Tolstoy

Stuck PLM Project and Leo Tolstoy
Oleg
Oleg
25 October, 2010 | 2 min for reading

I read a very short post from Aras by Jennifer McCullough of ArasFrustrated by a Stuck PLM Project?. The whole purpose of this blog is to point on the link to Stuck PLM page on Aras’ website. The Aras website is talking about license cost frustration, uncovered functionality and a problem to grow with limited budget. At the same time, it promises results.

Does it mean Aras engineers invented “Perpetuum Mobile”? No, I don’t think so. Aras engineers are making software. Aras business wizards decided to delay a painful moment of license’s fees to a later time and wrap it differently. It seems to be smart. They probably made homework in Chris Anderson’s Sunday school about the power of “FREE“. The Aras’ Stuck PLM Project story reminded my Anna Karenina roman by Leo Tolstoy. “All happy families are happy alike, every unhappy family is unhappy in its own way“. PLM marketing wizards are telling stories about “happy PLM implementations”. These stories are all the same. I think, the real implementation stories become more popular. The most interesting PLM implementation stories are about how to use a diverse set of tools to handle product development processes. When / If we will come to these stories, we have a chance to get back and talk about what tools we need to turn these stories into PLM happy stories.

What is my conclusion? Aras’ case in PLM is interesting. The important point is a sequence of events. Aras business managers are trying to put a carriage before horses. Will it work? A good question to ask. When you keep something in your hands, you can decide to give it away for free. Can it re-build a trust of potential customers frustrated from previous PLM experience? I think, it depends on what is next. If a quality of tools is good, and you have a right “set of expectations”, you can have a decent PLM free ride. You need to make it sustainable. If I need “a commute car”, I will never take an advantage of the entertainment system in the back of my limousine. If my “commute car” stack, I don’t need entertainment neither. How to have right tools to get a job done- this is a right question to ask these days. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
3 June, 2016

Integration is hard. Especially when it comes to such complex environment as engineering and manufacturing. Zerowait-state article PLM Dilemma and...

13 July, 2010

This week I am launching my new web site Beyond PLM. I started my first blog Daily PLM Think Tank on plmtwine.com...

16 November, 2015

More than 10 years ago, I had a conversation with one of telecom manufacturing companies in Europe. I asked –...

5 August, 2016

Product complexity is growing and software vendors are making a case for MBSE (model based system engineering) to bring modern...

1 June, 2020

In my recent discussion about Rethinking PLM architectures for Digital Thread, I’ve got an interesting comment about why Files are...

26 January, 2025

A long time ago, I came across a simple formula for building enterprise software: find a stakeholder in a company,...

10 November, 2017

Earlier this year, I learned from CIMdata that cloud PLM is not doing very well. CIMdata announced collaborative research sponsored...

4 December, 2015

Integration is one of the key problems in manufacturing these days. After all years of innovation and technology development, lot...

15 January, 2013

I would like to speak about PDM today. You can hardly find engineers that like data management. For many years,...

Blogroll

To the top