A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Open Standards and Data Sharing

Open Standards and Data Sharing
Oleg
Oleg
23 March, 2011 | 2 min for reading

What do you think about the role of standards in CAD and PLM? Some of recent development in Open Standards made me think about CAD and PLM related standards again. I had a chance to discuss “the standards” theme several times in the past on my blog. Navigate to the following links to catch up the discussion.

PLM and Open Standards – Money Talks?
PLM Standards: From Formats to Frameworks
What is the future of CAD and PLM Standards?
Open PLM – A Climb for Losers?

Standards: Obvious and Expensive

In my view, customers are interested in standards. Their reaction on standard is normally positive. The benefits of standard-related activities for customers are obvious. In the past large manufacturing companies were involved in the successful standard development. STEP is probably one of the examples. At the same time, I cannot see vendors are signing up for open standards in the world of CAD and PLM. They are mostly reactive and keep balance of supporting standard and proprietary system development.

Data Sharing and Standards

Manufacturing is global these days. To be able to exchange information between in-shore and off-shore, OEM and suppliers, vendors and partners become extremely important. Do you think “data sharing” problem will disappear with the development of open standards? I don’t see direct dependencies. Obviously, it will be easier to exchange data using standards. However, the devil is in details. The support of particular application features and/or data elements will give us a right answer on this question.

What is my conclusion? To support open standard is expensive tax. Who will pay it? Customers? Vendors? My favorite joke: Standards like toothbrushes. Everybody needs them, but nobody wants to use somebody else one. Next month, I’m going to attend Eurostep Share-A-Space 2011 Forum. Read more about this forum on LinkedIn. I hope to learn more the potential role of Eurostep in the supporting of standards as well as about development of commercial systems based on such a standard like STEP and PLCS. I’m going to live blog from there, so stay tuned…

Best, Oleg
Freebie.

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
22 June, 2015

When it comes to PLM and ERP, you may always get some feeling of rivalry at the air. PLM and ERP...

25 August, 2009

Yesterday, two separate article got my attention and brought me to think about Lifecycle. Alternatively, even more, about number of...

28 May, 2019

I’ve been catching up on reading during the past long weekend in U.S. GrabCAD article – The Need for Cloud-Based...

17 July, 2018

PLM is usually a journey of an organization transforming itself from one business model into another. While the process can...

3 November, 2010

What do you think about “paperless processes”. A good dream I can tell you… So, I decided to talk about...

20 July, 2018

Last year I shared my thoughts about how to replace legacy PLM and move forward. The idea is pretty simple...

28 December, 2011

Please welcome a new-old word – multiplatform. When did you hear about for the last time? For those of you...

2 February, 2010

I want to propose an unusual theme for our PLM discussion. Let’s talk about trends related to manufacturing and software...

26 September, 2010

I’ve been running the working group “New Trends in PLM” on COFES Russia / isicad-2010. I had no idea how...

Blogroll

To the top