A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

COFES, Microsoft and Engineering Software Business Models

COFES, Microsoft and Engineering Software Business Models
Oleg
Oleg
16 April, 2011 | 2 min for reading

COFES is a think tank for engineering software. This is a place where you can drop any idea and see if it resonates. One of the COFES sessions is so called Maieutic Parataxis session. Think about pitching your idea in front of 300 people. You can see a sequence of 7-10 pitches from people compressed in a row. This is what Maieutic Parataxis is about. Last year I shared the story about Simon Floyd of Microsoft talking about PLM Excels: COFES, Maieutic Parataxies and PLM Excels. This year Simon came with a new idea of future business models for engineering software. Some of Simon’s slides and observations were resonating with my previous thoughts about PLM software business models. About a year ago, I wrote about Faltered Licenses and Future PLM Business Models. I talked about Subscriptions, Advertising and Reverse models. Take a look on Simon’s slides and make your opinion.

What is my take on this? The engineering software is changing slowly. The dynamics are different from the consumer market where the idea of market pace was realized and succeed. I can see multiple reasons why it happens. The most important reason is what I call “a good enough” principle. Traditional manufacturers are very conservative. Software is just a tool for them to produce the result. Existing software can run these companies for years. At the same time, I can see signs of changes. There are two main reasons, in my view: cost and competition. In order to compete on the market, companies need to find more efficient software to get a job done. Engineering software market place can offer a diverse set of tools that can be used. However, the compatibility of these tools, data access and many other reasons can potentially lay down this idea. Leading companies in this space are thinking about market place and application granularity. I think next 5-7 years can show the potential of the realization of this model.  Just my thought…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
7 June, 2011

I want to talk about the topic, which is actually is not very new – revisions. I was reading Autodesk...

5 May, 2024

I wrote an article about 5 Opportunities and 5 Obstacles in Engineering Digital Transformation. In the article I shared my...

14 November, 2016

I’m on my way to Las Vegas to attend Autodesk University 2016 – an annual Autodesk gathering usually brings around 10’000...

14 July, 2011

I want to talk today about data sharing. The interest of engineers and other people in manufacturing organization in data...

16 September, 2010

Email is playing a significant role in the way every organization is management today. Organizations are run by emails these...

14 June, 2016

The king is dead, long live the king! It is a traditional proclamation made following the accession of a new...

4 February, 2021

My earlier article How to make BOM integrations easy? raised a lot of debates online and offline. It was quite...

14 August, 2021

PLM space is hot these days and the money is coming to PLM space. Earlier this year, Autodesk made an...

26 January, 2012

The amount of publications about PLM and cloud is growing. This is not surprising me. There are two reasons to...

Blogroll

To the top