A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

COFES, Microsoft and Engineering Software Business Models

COFES, Microsoft and Engineering Software Business Models
Oleg
Oleg
16 April, 2011 | 2 min for reading

COFES is a think tank for engineering software. This is a place where you can drop any idea and see if it resonates. One of the COFES sessions is so called Maieutic Parataxis session. Think about pitching your idea in front of 300 people. You can see a sequence of 7-10 pitches from people compressed in a row. This is what Maieutic Parataxis is about. Last year I shared the story about Simon Floyd of Microsoft talking about PLM Excels: COFES, Maieutic Parataxies and PLM Excels. This year Simon came with a new idea of future business models for engineering software. Some of Simon’s slides and observations were resonating with my previous thoughts about PLM software business models. About a year ago, I wrote about Faltered Licenses and Future PLM Business Models. I talked about Subscriptions, Advertising and Reverse models. Take a look on Simon’s slides and make your opinion.

What is my take on this? The engineering software is changing slowly. The dynamics are different from the consumer market where the idea of market pace was realized and succeed. I can see multiple reasons why it happens. The most important reason is what I call “a good enough” principle. Traditional manufacturers are very conservative. Software is just a tool for them to produce the result. Existing software can run these companies for years. At the same time, I can see signs of changes. There are two main reasons, in my view: cost and competition. In order to compete on the market, companies need to find more efficient software to get a job done. Engineering software market place can offer a diverse set of tools that can be used. However, the compatibility of these tools, data access and many other reasons can potentially lay down this idea. Leading companies in this space are thinking about market place and application granularity. I think next 5-7 years can show the potential of the realization of this model.  Just my thought…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
24 November, 2015

Mobile devices have changed the way we live for the last 5 years. A decade ago, I was perfectly satisfied...

5 October, 2009

I’d like to discuss a user experience topic today. I think, this is a very painful question if we are...

12 December, 2014

PLM selection is complex process. It takes time to make a decision, evaluate, build a pilot and implement PLM system....

5 June, 2020

Happy Friday! It is a dream day and I want to continue the article I wrote a few months ago...

11 October, 2023

In the dynamic landscape of modern manufacturing industry, Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) has carved out a significant niche. For years...

6 June, 2012

Data management and collaboration are not new topics. I think, the majority of industry experts agree that proper data management...

23 March, 2009

I’ve seen a growing number of publications related to Cloud Computing and all variations of SaaS / PaaS / IaaS...

12 July, 2010

Welcome! The new web site “Beyond PLM” is up and running. This site was work-in-progress for some time, so if...

19 October, 2010

I found an interesting news came from Google yesterday. Google introduced Google Cloud Connect function as part of the new...

Blogroll

To the top