A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM: How to Fix Technologies and Stop Fixing People?

PLM: How to Fix Technologies and Stop Fixing People?
Oleg
Oleg
20 April, 2011 | 2 min for reading

During the last week at COFES, I had a chance to listen to John Gage keynote – But Can It Slice a Pineapple? Gage talked about innovation, computers, changes, language and culture. One of his phrases resonated – “Technology is easy. People are hard“. It made me think about PLM concepts, technologies and implementations.

PLM and Product Development Process

In my view, product lifecycle management is about products development processes first. It originally started as PDM, it was very focused on data management. CAD models, Drawings, Revisions, Parts, Bill of Materials. It took almost 15 years to produce a reliable data management system that can handle all these things. However, the problem happened in between. Organizations became very complex. Many additional systems grew up to solve other business and development problems. Significant presence of ECAD and later software development introduce a new set of problems. So, product development process becomes more and more complicated. PLM companies eventually reflected the complexity in the taxonomies of their data and processes.

PLM Methodology

The question people often ask me – “what is the right PLM methodology?” It isn’t a new one. Since the complexity introduced in product developmnet continues to grow, PDM and PLM companies are trying to solve it by using various methods. One of them is to come with a clear methodology of work and system implementations. It started as “best practices” and then moved to the different colors and flavors of “how to” be related to PLM implementations. The biggest problem I have with this approach is that it actually requires a significant non-software influence in an organization. Which goes back to “people”.

PLM Technology

I think the question what is PLM technology is actually very confusing one. Nevertheless, I clarify it as a technology to manage data, processes and collaborate in a scope of product data development. So, what happens on this side? I don’t see any revolutionary changes since early 2000s. The massive amount acquisitions put vendors on a pathway of integrating acquisitions and converging technologies. The latest spark of PDM/PLM technologies happened in the last 1990s and early 2000s. Back that time, the concept of a flexible data model was invented. Finally, companies could create configurable applications. However, the outcome was an increased amount of service implementations and lots of methodology developments.

What is my conclusion? People are hard. I agree completely. To change them is near to impossible. By creating products that dependent on change of how people work, we are exposed to very long adoption cycle, expensive marketing and complicated implementations. Is it PLM fault? Yes, partially. People were exposed to a complicated stuff. However, fixing some technological issues can be a good idea to make products more friendly to people. I see a problem when PLM implementations are focused on how to change people’s work habits. The challenge is how to bring intelligent products that can handle the change for people. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
20 June, 2012

IP Management. If you’re in PLM business most probably you had a chance to hear this term. Most of the...

23 October, 2015

Workflow management is boring. And complicated. I know many people that literally hate workflows. Unfortunately, enterprise software is fully hooked on process management...

17 July, 2013

Excel is one of the most widely accepted PLM systems. PLM vendors and consultants may disagree with this strong statement....

2 February, 2017

IoT and connected products are transforming businesses and industries. The expectation is high, so we can see how whole industries...

21 July, 2010

The ability to have an important engineering information reference seems to me obvious. Thanks for one of my readers, who...

30 November, 2011

Autodesk University 2011. Day 1. If you visited AU at least once you know how it looks like. Thousands people...

22 May, 2021

My last article PLM vs ERP Tug of War generated a great number of comments. Thanks, everyone for sharing your...

13 August, 2010

I was thinking about how PLM balance product lifecycle from the standpoint of producing and consuming product data. The product...

21 April, 2009

Last week I had the chance to attend COFES 2009 forum in Scottsdale, AZ. It had a great atmosphere and...

Blogroll

To the top