A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM, Organization and Information Silos: Good, Bad and Ugly

PLM, Organization and Information Silos: Good, Bad and Ugly
Oleg
Oleg
2 October, 2011 | 2 min for reading

Earlier this month, I posted What is the biggest PLM challenge? Since then I had multiple conversations on twitter, blog and LinkedIn groups. Discussing a potential level of changes in the organization, I came to the topic of “information silos”. I found this topic interesting. Information silos – is it good or bad? Is it a problem at all? What PLM vision need to be applied to handle it? I wanted to quote one of my readers:

…It is about maintaining a trade-off between what is local and what is global in a company. The problem in my view is one of terminology. If we say “silos” we immediately think “bad”. This in turn promotes actions to minimize silos, which is harmful if driven too far. We need to conceptualize the organization in a different way. My take is “work practice” or similar constructs. An organization would be seen as a constellation of workpractices, each contributing to the overall goal of the organization. This would provide a perspective where trade-off, silos, business processes, etc., could be discussed from a more productive point of view.

I followed up the same topic on the round table during Autodesk Forum in Moscow. During the discussion, we found some interesting facts. Few participants mentioned that one of the challenges during PLM implementation is that PLM improve the transparency of  processes and corresponded information in an organization. You can say – this is a really good thing. However, I’ve heard people faced organizational resistance. Information and process control is a power in every organization. So, people responsible for it don’t want to lose it. At the same time PLM streamlines processes it reduces the power of “gate keepers”. This is the ugly truth.

What is my conclusion? PLM is not only about technology. It can (actually does) change the way organization works top-down and bottom up. To manage this change is an important part of every implementation. However, PLM technologies nee to allow to make this change more transparent and less painful. Just my thoughts… I’d be interested to hear more about your experience. Speak your mind.

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
5 February, 2020

Change management is one of the fundamental elements of product lifecycle control. In a nutshell, it is all about changes....

19 April, 2012

One of the sessions I especially liked during COFES 2012 was a keynote by Richard Riff – The Intersection of...

14 July, 2014

Selling PLM for SME was always a very controversial topic among PLM vendors. No consensus here. I wrote about it...

21 August, 2020

Omne Trium Perfectum. Friday is a special day and I’m always trying to make Friday blog special. I’ve been thinking...

24 August, 2009

Short prompt. I’m reading the article “Microsoft Outlook sets its sights for Mac”.“Microsoft is offering Outlook on Mac to enterprises...

19 May, 2011

This is my presentation from today’s discussion on Eurostep 2011 forum. Thinking outside the box about PLM View more presentations...

21 September, 2020

The topic of Intelligent Part Numbers is near and dear to the hearts of many people in the engineering, manufacturing,...

27 July, 2018

It is time to rethink the way we work. How many times you’ve heard about it during last few years....

5 June, 2021

Earlier this week, I had a chance to attend the PLM Market and Industry Forum organized by CIMdata. It was...

Blogroll

To the top