A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM, Organization and Information Silos: Good, Bad and Ugly

PLM, Organization and Information Silos: Good, Bad and Ugly
Oleg
Oleg
2 October, 2011 | 2 min for reading

Earlier this month, I posted What is the biggest PLM challenge? Since then I had multiple conversations on twitter, blog and LinkedIn groups. Discussing a potential level of changes in the organization, I came to the topic of “information silos”. I found this topic interesting. Information silos – is it good or bad? Is it a problem at all? What PLM vision need to be applied to handle it? I wanted to quote one of my readers:

…It is about maintaining a trade-off between what is local and what is global in a company. The problem in my view is one of terminology. If we say “silos” we immediately think “bad”. This in turn promotes actions to minimize silos, which is harmful if driven too far. We need to conceptualize the organization in a different way. My take is “work practice” or similar constructs. An organization would be seen as a constellation of workpractices, each contributing to the overall goal of the organization. This would provide a perspective where trade-off, silos, business processes, etc., could be discussed from a more productive point of view.

I followed up the same topic on the round table during Autodesk Forum in Moscow. During the discussion, we found some interesting facts. Few participants mentioned that one of the challenges during PLM implementation is that PLM improve the transparency of  processes and corresponded information in an organization. You can say – this is a really good thing. However, I’ve heard people faced organizational resistance. Information and process control is a power in every organization. So, people responsible for it don’t want to lose it. At the same time PLM streamlines processes it reduces the power of “gate keepers”. This is the ugly truth.

What is my conclusion? PLM is not only about technology. It can (actually does) change the way organization works top-down and bottom up. To manage this change is an important part of every implementation. However, PLM technologies nee to allow to make this change more transparent and less painful. Just my thoughts… I’d be interested to hear more about your experience. Speak your mind.

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
28 June, 2016

For many years, customization was one of the key elements of PLM system implementation. It was a step when PLM...

30 March, 2010

Thanks for one of my readers who sent me the link to Wrench Enterprise. Their presentation about project collaboration and...

15 June, 2018

I’m learning this week from Hexagon in their Hexagon Live event in Las Vegas. The main big topic on the...

11 July, 2016

In the early days of electronic and computer development, “digital” was a technology that generates, stores and process data in...

1 March, 2012

I think, 2012 will become a year of cloud. Arena Solutions is not a new kid in the block. The...

10 March, 2025

The number of applications and tools created using AI technologies is skyrocketing. It is amazing to see how AI tools...

3 May, 2017

One of the biggest challenges for PLM vendors is to extend their product usage beyond engineering applications. Even we can...

12 December, 2008

  In one of my previous posts (Structured vs. Unstructured) I wrote about ability of PLM to bring additional advantages...

8 February, 2021

My recent blog about how to integrate BOMs and also the opportunity to have a Single BOM? brought many questions...

Blogroll

To the top