A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM, Organization and Information Silos: Good, Bad and Ugly

PLM, Organization and Information Silos: Good, Bad and Ugly
Oleg
Oleg
2 October, 2011 | 2 min for reading

Earlier this month, I posted What is the biggest PLM challenge? Since then I had multiple conversations on twitter, blog and LinkedIn groups. Discussing a potential level of changes in the organization, I came to the topic of “information silos”. I found this topic interesting. Information silos – is it good or bad? Is it a problem at all? What PLM vision need to be applied to handle it? I wanted to quote one of my readers:

…It is about maintaining a trade-off between what is local and what is global in a company. The problem in my view is one of terminology. If we say “silos” we immediately think “bad”. This in turn promotes actions to minimize silos, which is harmful if driven too far. We need to conceptualize the organization in a different way. My take is “work practice” or similar constructs. An organization would be seen as a constellation of workpractices, each contributing to the overall goal of the organization. This would provide a perspective where trade-off, silos, business processes, etc., could be discussed from a more productive point of view.

I followed up the same topic on the round table during Autodesk Forum in Moscow. During the discussion, we found some interesting facts. Few participants mentioned that one of the challenges during PLM implementation is that PLM improve the transparency of  processes and corresponded information in an organization. You can say – this is a really good thing. However, I’ve heard people faced organizational resistance. Information and process control is a power in every organization. So, people responsible for it don’t want to lose it. At the same time PLM streamlines processes it reduces the power of “gate keepers”. This is the ugly truth.

What is my conclusion? PLM is not only about technology. It can (actually does) change the way organization works top-down and bottom up. To manage this change is an important part of every implementation. However, PLM technologies nee to allow to make this change more transparent and less painful. Just my thoughts… I’d be interested to hear more about your experience. Speak your mind.

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
14 October, 2023

It is almost 40 years after PLM was introduced by American Motors Corporation (AMC). Digital Engineering article PLM Stays Relevant...

17 February, 2021

The file is a fundamental concept in any operating system. Files are one of the most popular mechanisms for data...

3 January, 2018

Believe it or not, each manufacturing company has PLM. If your company is in the business of design, product development...

20 May, 2010

Process management is an important aspect and activity in Product Lifecycle Management. Multiple activities in product design, engineering and manufacturing...

19 June, 2009

I’m going back to talking about the CAD interoperability story, inspired by some interesting experience with Google Apps and Microsoft...

8 September, 2017

Siemens PLM changed the format of Solid Edge University. From a single a big event usually organized in Midwest U.S.,...

9 March, 2021

A few years ago, “platformization:” was a hot term. CIMdata was sharing their study about the role of platforms in...

24 December, 2016

For decades, marketing strategies have been telling companies to differentiate. From startups to large enterprise companies, the ability to differentiate...

18 December, 2008

In my previous posts I already touched on “cloud services” aspects of product delivery and operation. There are multiple examples...

Blogroll

To the top