A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM, Organization and Information Silos: Good, Bad and Ugly

PLM, Organization and Information Silos: Good, Bad and Ugly
Oleg
Oleg
2 October, 2011 | 2 min for reading

Earlier this month, I posted What is the biggest PLM challenge? Since then I had multiple conversations on twitter, blog and LinkedIn groups. Discussing a potential level of changes in the organization, I came to the topic of “information silos”. I found this topic interesting. Information silos – is it good or bad? Is it a problem at all? What PLM vision need to be applied to handle it? I wanted to quote one of my readers:

…It is about maintaining a trade-off between what is local and what is global in a company. The problem in my view is one of terminology. If we say “silos” we immediately think “bad”. This in turn promotes actions to minimize silos, which is harmful if driven too far. We need to conceptualize the organization in a different way. My take is “work practice” or similar constructs. An organization would be seen as a constellation of workpractices, each contributing to the overall goal of the organization. This would provide a perspective where trade-off, silos, business processes, etc., could be discussed from a more productive point of view.

I followed up the same topic on the round table during Autodesk Forum in Moscow. During the discussion, we found some interesting facts. Few participants mentioned that one of the challenges during PLM implementation is that PLM improve the transparency of  processes and corresponded information in an organization. You can say – this is a really good thing. However, I’ve heard people faced organizational resistance. Information and process control is a power in every organization. So, people responsible for it don’t want to lose it. At the same time PLM streamlines processes it reduces the power of “gate keepers”. This is the ugly truth.

What is my conclusion? PLM is not only about technology. It can (actually does) change the way organization works top-down and bottom up. To manage this change is an important part of every implementation. However, PLM technologies nee to allow to make this change more transparent and less painful. Just my thoughts… I’d be interested to hear more about your experience. Speak your mind.

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
6 July, 2010

Product-related data is one of the very aspects of PLM implementations. When you talk about PLM implementation, the topic of...

19 June, 2019

Many years ago, I’ve been following research papers of George J. Klir related to system approach in solving problems. My...

27 February, 2017

At the time research companies and industries pundits are trying to answer on the question why cloud PLM adoption is...

18 March, 2018

To define PLM can be a tough job for manufacturing organizations. Usually, my practical recommendation to manufacturing companies is not...

20 May, 2009

Interesting thoughts by Stephen Arnold related to On-Premise vs. SaaS software based on SAP case.  Also link on Understanding SAP’s Business...

6 January, 2015

I had a chance to visit The Art of Brick exhibition in Boston’s Faneuil Hall Museum few days ago. If you...

23 April, 2018

I’m coming to SuiteWorld 2018 – an annual gathering of NetSuite ERP users, partners and developers. According to the website, NetSuite...

28 July, 2016

For the last year, I had chance to talk many manufacturing companies in range from small hardware startups to large...

4 March, 2014

Excel spreadsheet. What a lovely topic! You can find spreadsheets in every manufacturing and engineering organization. Sometimes, I call it...

Blogroll

To the top