A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM, Organization and Information Silos: Good, Bad and Ugly

PLM, Organization and Information Silos: Good, Bad and Ugly
Oleg
Oleg
2 October, 2011 | 2 min for reading

Earlier this month, I posted What is the biggest PLM challenge? Since then I had multiple conversations on twitter, blog and LinkedIn groups. Discussing a potential level of changes in the organization, I came to the topic of “information silos”. I found this topic interesting. Information silos – is it good or bad? Is it a problem at all? What PLM vision need to be applied to handle it? I wanted to quote one of my readers:

…It is about maintaining a trade-off between what is local and what is global in a company. The problem in my view is one of terminology. If we say “silos” we immediately think “bad”. This in turn promotes actions to minimize silos, which is harmful if driven too far. We need to conceptualize the organization in a different way. My take is “work practice” or similar constructs. An organization would be seen as a constellation of workpractices, each contributing to the overall goal of the organization. This would provide a perspective where trade-off, silos, business processes, etc., could be discussed from a more productive point of view.

I followed up the same topic on the round table during Autodesk Forum in Moscow. During the discussion, we found some interesting facts. Few participants mentioned that one of the challenges during PLM implementation is that PLM improve the transparency of  processes and corresponded information in an organization. You can say – this is a really good thing. However, I’ve heard people faced organizational resistance. Information and process control is a power in every organization. So, people responsible for it don’t want to lose it. At the same time PLM streamlines processes it reduces the power of “gate keepers”. This is the ugly truth.

What is my conclusion? PLM is not only about technology. It can (actually does) change the way organization works top-down and bottom up. To manage this change is an important part of every implementation. However, PLM technologies nee to allow to make this change more transparent and less painful. Just my thoughts… I’d be interested to hear more about your experience. Speak your mind.

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
28 November, 2010

Google Wave Dead. Long live Wave In a Box (WIAB). Navigate your browser to the following link and you will...

22 October, 2009

I’d like to continue the discussion about the Bill of Materials. I learned a lot from previous posts. Thank you all for...

4 October, 2018

Changes are coming to CAD industry and you can feel it. I attended Develop3D Live Boston event earlier this week...

28 September, 2009

Short prompt in the beginning of the week. I was reading post from BSW “Killer Ideas And Controlled Innovation: Why...

17 November, 2010

I had a chance to read Matt Lombard’s – What if you CAD data were in a database? The discussion...

8 January, 2023

The evolution of the PLM digital thread has created an ever-increasing need for enterprises to prioritize and better manage their...

18 August, 2020

Cloud and SaaS are changing PLM software. The new technology makes SaaS PLM easily accessible and available instantly to customers....

24 October, 2016

Customization is a bad word in jargon of PLM implementations. The modern lingo brings us a new politically correct word...

23 October, 2013

Technology space is good about inventing new jobs, titles and responsibilities. Until now, we knew about CEO, COO, CIO… The...

Blogroll

To the top