A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM, Organization and Information Silos: Good, Bad and Ugly

PLM, Organization and Information Silos: Good, Bad and Ugly
Oleg
Oleg
2 October, 2011 | 2 min for reading

Earlier this month, I posted What is the biggest PLM challenge? Since then I had multiple conversations on twitter, blog and LinkedIn groups. Discussing a potential level of changes in the organization, I came to the topic of “information silos”. I found this topic interesting. Information silos – is it good or bad? Is it a problem at all? What PLM vision need to be applied to handle it? I wanted to quote one of my readers:

…It is about maintaining a trade-off between what is local and what is global in a company. The problem in my view is one of terminology. If we say “silos” we immediately think “bad”. This in turn promotes actions to minimize silos, which is harmful if driven too far. We need to conceptualize the organization in a different way. My take is “work practice” or similar constructs. An organization would be seen as a constellation of workpractices, each contributing to the overall goal of the organization. This would provide a perspective where trade-off, silos, business processes, etc., could be discussed from a more productive point of view.

I followed up the same topic on the round table during Autodesk Forum in Moscow. During the discussion, we found some interesting facts. Few participants mentioned that one of the challenges during PLM implementation is that PLM improve the transparency of  processes and corresponded information in an organization. You can say – this is a really good thing. However, I’ve heard people faced organizational resistance. Information and process control is a power in every organization. So, people responsible for it don’t want to lose it. At the same time PLM streamlines processes it reduces the power of “gate keepers”. This is the ugly truth.

What is my conclusion? PLM is not only about technology. It can (actually does) change the way organization works top-down and bottom up. To manage this change is an important part of every implementation. However, PLM technologies nee to allow to make this change more transparent and less painful. Just my thoughts… I’d be interested to hear more about your experience. Speak your mind.

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
22 February, 2013

I spent the beginning of this week in Berlin attending PI (Product Innovation) congress. Navigate to the following link to...

4 February, 2019

Welcome to another weekly update about my BOM Musings video blog. I started this week with a video explaining when...

1 July, 2016

PLM has deep roots into process and workflows. You can find pieces of process implementation everywhere – starting from CAD...

1 September, 2016

PLM cloud comparison was a topic of my ongoing research and discussions since last year. Cloud adoption is growing. In...

4 January, 2013

3D printing is still a narrow niche play zone. In my view, we are not going to see 3D printer...

13 July, 2012

Design and engineering world are changing fast these days. 20 years ago, the objective of CAD and other engineering software...

23 May, 2012

Technological disruption is a very interesting topic. The term “disruptive technology” is overused, in my view. Nevertheless, if you can...

30 July, 2018

I’ve been catching up on some reading during the weekend. The following article by Tech-Clarify caught my attention – Siemens...

4 August, 2015

Cloud is not a foreign word in a lexicon of CAD and PLM developers. Although, there is probably no agreement...

Blogroll

To the top