A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM, Organization and Information Silos: Good, Bad and Ugly

PLM, Organization and Information Silos: Good, Bad and Ugly
Oleg
Oleg
2 October, 2011 | 2 min for reading

Earlier this month, I posted What is the biggest PLM challenge? Since then I had multiple conversations on twitter, blog and LinkedIn groups. Discussing a potential level of changes in the organization, I came to the topic of “information silos”. I found this topic interesting. Information silos – is it good or bad? Is it a problem at all? What PLM vision need to be applied to handle it? I wanted to quote one of my readers:

…It is about maintaining a trade-off between what is local and what is global in a company. The problem in my view is one of terminology. If we say “silos” we immediately think “bad”. This in turn promotes actions to minimize silos, which is harmful if driven too far. We need to conceptualize the organization in a different way. My take is “work practice” or similar constructs. An organization would be seen as a constellation of workpractices, each contributing to the overall goal of the organization. This would provide a perspective where trade-off, silos, business processes, etc., could be discussed from a more productive point of view.

I followed up the same topic on the round table during Autodesk Forum in Moscow. During the discussion, we found some interesting facts. Few participants mentioned that one of the challenges during PLM implementation is that PLM improve the transparency of  processes and corresponded information in an organization. You can say – this is a really good thing. However, I’ve heard people faced organizational resistance. Information and process control is a power in every organization. So, people responsible for it don’t want to lose it. At the same time PLM streamlines processes it reduces the power of “gate keepers”. This is the ugly truth.

What is my conclusion? PLM is not only about technology. It can (actually does) change the way organization works top-down and bottom up. To manage this change is an important part of every implementation. However, PLM technologies nee to allow to make this change more transparent and less painful. Just my thoughts… I’d be interested to hear more about your experience. Speak your mind.

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
22 May, 2013

Collaboration. Magic and one of the most confusing words. People are using it in so many contexts that it became...

7 March, 2013

After 20+ years of CAD and PDM development, the issue of versioning is not solved. How about that? I hope,...

2 November, 2009

Interesting publication came during the weekend related to the future of collaboration. According to the analytical research, 80 Per Cent...

19 May, 2015

It is hard overestimate the importance of Bill of Materials for product development. In my keynote at ProSTEP iViP symposium...

8 November, 2010

Today, I had an interesting experience in my life. I had a chance to attend Dassault System Enovia Collaborative Innovation...

21 September, 2024

The Product Data Management Software (PDM) business, which started as a way to manage CAD (Computer Aided Design) files, is...

16 February, 2009

How can we improve user adoption of PLM in the organization? What technologies can we use?? How can we reuse...

22 August, 2021

Data is taking a central stage in everything that businesses do these days. You can hear about digital strategies and...

9 December, 2009

Social is growing. During the past two years, we had seen many new topics introduced by social computing – social...

Blogroll

To the top