A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM, Search and Findability

PLM, Search and Findability
Oleg
Oleg
20 May, 2013 | 2 min for reading

Searching for information is a tricky thing. Search may sounds as a simple operation, but in fact,  it is translated to a complex computational, information and organizational task. Search isn’t a new problem. Lots of work was done in this domain for the last 20 years. Google clearly changed a consumer perception about internet search. Google “lady Gaga” and in less than a second you will have all relevant internet information about Lady Gaga.

However, searching inside of corporate data is different. What works for “lady Gaga” type of search, doesn’t work for MPR-345000 type of search for product information, part numbers, documents in SharePoints, emails, intranet sites and other enterprise data sources. It is complicated and daunting task. Sometimes, it even goes beyond of what is most important – it is about where to search. During my previous work at Inforbix, I found customers are usually very confused about searching information. They think about search as an easy and complicated thing at the same time and usually blame IT for not bringing a right solution to solve the problem of search.

I’ve been looking on materials coming from Enterprise Search Europe 2013 conference earlier this week. looking on Enterprise Search and Findability Survey 2013 published by FINDWISE and presented by Kristian Norling few weeks ago. The following two slides caught my special attention. It speaks about what are the obstacles to find the right information. Take a look on the following statistics:

According to the research, there are top 5 obstacles – we do wrong tagging, we don’t know where to search, tools are not perfect as well as tagging made by tools. The last one is even more interesting – we don’t know what to look for.

What is my conclusion? Information search is a complicated, but fascinating topic. For the last few years CAD and PLM vendors started to put more emphasis in order to improve their way to search and actually find the information. However, solving the problem of a single tool is still not enough. Even if company has PLM/PDM system in place, the information usually located in disparate sources. As we learn from the research, the problem is going much beyond searching for a specific set of keywords – data sources are not defined and how to search for right data is not clear as well. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
12 November, 2015

Cost is one of the most important drivers to optimize manufacturing and operations. But at the same time, this is...

12 July, 2018

Collaboration is one of these words that always created lot of confusion. For the last few years, we’ve seen CAD...

25 August, 2010

Cloud or SaaS application continue intriguing developers and vendors. In my view, during the last 2 years, talks around cloud...

15 December, 2014

There is no shortage of talks about IoT these days. CAD and PLM vendors included. While each company is developing...

27 August, 2019

Yesterday was my first day at Conx19. Great organization and inspiring speakers. I was reflecting on presentation and discussions. Here...

31 July, 2009

My new blog post of DS 3D Perspectives Blog. From 1998 searches circa to Search Media, Tag Results, View Examples....

8 October, 2009

Do you remember, PLM Think Tank is about future crazy ideas? So, here you go – one that I liked...

1 February, 2017

After decades of using emails threads and sequential workflow diagrams for collaboration in enterprise, the shift is coming – welcome...

28 April, 2015

The last decade changed  many things in our everyday life. It is hard to imagine, but just think about few...

Blogroll

To the top