A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM real implementations: too long to be on-time?

PLM real implementations: too long to be on-time?
Oleg
Oleg
7 July, 2013 | 2 min for reading

One of the looongest US weekends I remember  is going to end. This is a time to get back from relaxing holiday atmosphere  to business reality. I’ve been skimming social channels and stumbled on PLM statistics posts published by my good friend and PLM blogging buddy Jos Voskuil. Navigate to the following link – PLM statistics–the result. Read and make your opinion. Jos’ main conclusion – PLM is more vision than tech. PLM implementation is a journey that takes time, effort and resources. Some interesting and funny things came out of comparison of experience and PLM implementation time. Here is the passage I liked:

Here, it was interesting to see that more than 60 % of the respondents have over 8 years of experience. As mentioned related to the previous questions it is necessary to have a long term experience. Sometimes I meet a “Senior” PLM Consultant  (business card) with two or three years of experience. I believe we should reserve the word “senior” for PLM with a minimum amount of 5 years experience. And it is also depending on the amount of projects you were involved in. Interesting thought came into my mind. Some vendors claim the provide extreme rapid implementations for PLM ( 2 weeks / 30 days / 3 months). If this is real PLM you could do 25, 12 or 4 PLM projects per year full time.

It made me think about PLM implementations in the way they exist today – journey type of specialized implementation requiring time and effort. I certainly agree with Jos- to change the way companies work requires vision, time and effort. In some situations, PLM implementations are coming to change product development processes established during decades.

However, here is a different angle to look on PLM problem. Business is very dynamic these days. Business environment, ecosystem, technology, human resources, business landscape. What if the current lifecycle of many PLM implementations is not very inline with business needs? It reminds me one of the old PTC slides from COFES Israel – people just want drink beer!

What is my conclusion? New enterprise landscape and business reality will be require a different approach in everything – IT, computing models, enterprise software and implementations. We’ve seen lots of changes in consumer technology space, open source and other places happened over the past 10 years. People are looking how to build new products faster and provide a quick respond on customers demands. So, my hunch some of PLM journeys will be late to deliver results. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
11 August, 2010

I’ve been reading Ray Kurland interviewing Rich Allen of Dassault Systems SolidWorks Corp. about the future of SolidWorks’ cloud solutions....

19 November, 2019

I’m attending Autodesk University 2019 in Las Vegas. If you never been at AU, this is an annual extravaganza of...

21 February, 2021

The data is a new oil. This is a mantra of modern business, products, and technologies. Big tech companies built...

24 December, 2008

 One of the biggest organizational challenges is to get an agreement about business and organizational processes in the context of...

2 September, 2013

It has been long time since I discussed PLM and social trend on my blog. Social is going mainstream these...

1 March, 2013

What is the right PLM size? This question is continuously debated and discussed by PLM vendors. This topic remains active...

15 March, 2020

A few years ago, I wrote my article – Who will make PLM sexier? My point was that for a...

7 March, 2018

For many years, PLM analysts, consultants and vendors claimed that silos are bad and need to be broken to transform...

5 January, 2021

Connected is such a powerful word. We are connected in so many ways these days. Think about transformations that happened...

Blogroll

To the top