A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM real implementations: too long to be on-time?

PLM real implementations: too long to be on-time?
Oleg
Oleg
7 July, 2013 | 2 min for reading

One of the looongest US weekends I remember  is going to end. This is a time to get back from relaxing holiday atmosphere  to business reality. I’ve been skimming social channels and stumbled on PLM statistics posts published by my good friend and PLM blogging buddy Jos Voskuil. Navigate to the following link – PLM statistics–the result. Read and make your opinion. Jos’ main conclusion – PLM is more vision than tech. PLM implementation is a journey that takes time, effort and resources. Some interesting and funny things came out of comparison of experience and PLM implementation time. Here is the passage I liked:

Here, it was interesting to see that more than 60 % of the respondents have over 8 years of experience. As mentioned related to the previous questions it is necessary to have a long term experience. Sometimes I meet a “Senior” PLM Consultant  (business card) with two or three years of experience. I believe we should reserve the word “senior” for PLM with a minimum amount of 5 years experience. And it is also depending on the amount of projects you were involved in. Interesting thought came into my mind. Some vendors claim the provide extreme rapid implementations for PLM ( 2 weeks / 30 days / 3 months). If this is real PLM you could do 25, 12 or 4 PLM projects per year full time.

It made me think about PLM implementations in the way they exist today – journey type of specialized implementation requiring time and effort. I certainly agree with Jos- to change the way companies work requires vision, time and effort. In some situations, PLM implementations are coming to change product development processes established during decades.

However, here is a different angle to look on PLM problem. Business is very dynamic these days. Business environment, ecosystem, technology, human resources, business landscape. What if the current lifecycle of many PLM implementations is not very inline with business needs? It reminds me one of the old PTC slides from COFES Israel – people just want drink beer!

What is my conclusion? New enterprise landscape and business reality will be require a different approach in everything – IT, computing models, enterprise software and implementations. We’ve seen lots of changes in consumer technology space, open source and other places happened over the past 10 years. People are looking how to build new products faster and provide a quick respond on customers demands. So, my hunch some of PLM journeys will be late to deliver results. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
27 November, 2018

General Motors’ decision to close five plants and lay off tens of thousands of workers in the U.S. and Canada...

16 June, 2016

I’m attending Autodesk Forge DevCon these days in San Francisco. This is first ever pure Development Conference. Autodesk is making...

29 January, 2009

I was reading an interview with Chris Williams about his new product, Vuuch, on NOVEDGE. Chris said that “the CAD...

21 November, 2017

Blockchain topic is extremely hot these days. Earlier this morning, I had a chance to talk with one of my...

19 October, 2010

I found an interesting news came from Google yesterday. Google introduced Google Cloud Connect function as part of the new...

27 November, 2018

My attention was caused by Aras blog – Are You in a Bad PLM Relationship? written by Mark Reisig. Nice...

25 August, 2017

Modern technological changes are reshaping the way enterprise systems are organized and operating. At the time, internet, mobile phone and...

23 July, 2009

New post on 3D Perspectives. Visual complexity. Cool stuff… Visual Complexity Best, Oleg.

9 October, 2019

For many years, flexibility was considered as one of the most critical differentiation of PLM platforms. Companies were looking into...

Blogroll

To the top