A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM real implementations: too long to be on-time?

PLM real implementations: too long to be on-time?
Oleg
Oleg
7 July, 2013 | 2 min for reading

One of the looongest US weekends I remember  is going to end. This is a time to get back from relaxing holiday atmosphere  to business reality. I’ve been skimming social channels and stumbled on PLM statistics posts published by my good friend and PLM blogging buddy Jos Voskuil. Navigate to the following link – PLM statistics–the result. Read and make your opinion. Jos’ main conclusion – PLM is more vision than tech. PLM implementation is a journey that takes time, effort and resources. Some interesting and funny things came out of comparison of experience and PLM implementation time. Here is the passage I liked:

Here, it was interesting to see that more than 60 % of the respondents have over 8 years of experience. As mentioned related to the previous questions it is necessary to have a long term experience. Sometimes I meet a “Senior” PLM Consultant  (business card) with two or three years of experience. I believe we should reserve the word “senior” for PLM with a minimum amount of 5 years experience. And it is also depending on the amount of projects you were involved in. Interesting thought came into my mind. Some vendors claim the provide extreme rapid implementations for PLM ( 2 weeks / 30 days / 3 months). If this is real PLM you could do 25, 12 or 4 PLM projects per year full time.

It made me think about PLM implementations in the way they exist today – journey type of specialized implementation requiring time and effort. I certainly agree with Jos- to change the way companies work requires vision, time and effort. In some situations, PLM implementations are coming to change product development processes established during decades.

However, here is a different angle to look on PLM problem. Business is very dynamic these days. Business environment, ecosystem, technology, human resources, business landscape. What if the current lifecycle of many PLM implementations is not very inline with business needs? It reminds me one of the old PTC slides from COFES Israel – people just want drink beer!

What is my conclusion? New enterprise landscape and business reality will be require a different approach in everything – IT, computing models, enterprise software and implementations. We’ve seen lots of changes in consumer technology space, open source and other places happened over the past 10 years. People are looking how to build new products faster and provide a quick respond on customers demands. So, my hunch some of PLM journeys will be late to deliver results. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
18 November, 2010

The Facebook announcement about introducing of FB messaging system triggered a flood of posts. I’ve been looking over them for...

1 December, 2019

I’ve been following Autodesk development in PDM and PLM space for the last decade. You can check some of my...

21 February, 2014

JIT (Just in Time) is a well-known approach in manufacturing industry. In a nutshell, JIT is a production strategy to reduce...

26 September, 2012

People are creating ‘chaos’ by the nature of our work. This is a reality in many situations. In my view,...

13 July, 2010

My new website and blog is BeyondPLM. The original post is here. This week I am launching my new web...

28 August, 2013

Are you familiar with 1% internet rule? It is also called 90-9-1 principle. According to this rule, only 1% of...

19 July, 2017

It is not a big secret that PLM vendors are stuck to provide a good solution for mid-size manufacturing companies....

16 August, 2010

Bloomberg Business Week published an interesting story – Big Tech Problem as Mainframes Outlast Workforce. Some facts about IBM mainframe...

10 November, 2015

For the last few years we’ve seen a wave of new “mobile” devices coming into business space. Mobile devices are...

Blogroll

To the top