A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM real implementations: too long to be on-time?

PLM real implementations: too long to be on-time?
Oleg
Oleg
7 July, 2013 | 2 min for reading

One of the looongest US weekends I remember  is going to end. This is a time to get back from relaxing holiday atmosphere  to business reality. I’ve been skimming social channels and stumbled on PLM statistics posts published by my good friend and PLM blogging buddy Jos Voskuil. Navigate to the following link – PLM statistics–the result. Read and make your opinion. Jos’ main conclusion – PLM is more vision than tech. PLM implementation is a journey that takes time, effort and resources. Some interesting and funny things came out of comparison of experience and PLM implementation time. Here is the passage I liked:

Here, it was interesting to see that more than 60 % of the respondents have over 8 years of experience. As mentioned related to the previous questions it is necessary to have a long term experience. Sometimes I meet a “Senior” PLM Consultant  (business card) with two or three years of experience. I believe we should reserve the word “senior” for PLM with a minimum amount of 5 years experience. And it is also depending on the amount of projects you were involved in. Interesting thought came into my mind. Some vendors claim the provide extreme rapid implementations for PLM ( 2 weeks / 30 days / 3 months). If this is real PLM you could do 25, 12 or 4 PLM projects per year full time.

It made me think about PLM implementations in the way they exist today – journey type of specialized implementation requiring time and effort. I certainly agree with Jos- to change the way companies work requires vision, time and effort. In some situations, PLM implementations are coming to change product development processes established during decades.

However, here is a different angle to look on PLM problem. Business is very dynamic these days. Business environment, ecosystem, technology, human resources, business landscape. What if the current lifecycle of many PLM implementations is not very inline with business needs? It reminds me one of the old PTC slides from COFES Israel – people just want drink beer!

What is my conclusion? New enterprise landscape and business reality will be require a different approach in everything – IT, computing models, enterprise software and implementations. We’ve seen lots of changes in consumer technology space, open source and other places happened over the past 10 years. People are looking how to build new products faster and provide a quick respond on customers demands. So, my hunch some of PLM journeys will be late to deliver results. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
20 May, 2013

Searching for information is a tricky thing. Search may sounds as a simple operation, but in fact,  it is translated...

11 February, 2017

Interesting things are happening with Solidworks PDM these days. I’ve been following Solidworks World 2017 event earlier this week in...

17 June, 2026

Fourth and final article in my PTC Next 2026 series. The first asked whether “intelligent” PLM is a rename or...

16 January, 2021

Earlier this week, I shared my views about the future of data in PLM. Check this out here. Data is...

5 June, 2009

Last week we discussed a lot MS Excel capabilities for PLM. Why Do I Like My PLM Excel Spreadsheet? PLM Excel...

25 September, 2009

The term “management” is very misused, in my view. Long time ago, somebody told me – if you don’t know...

26 July, 2016

Almost a decade years ago, I’ve been using HTC phone running Windows mobile operational system. The same one you see...

26 February, 2015

It is not uncommon to hear about “changing paradigms” in different domains these days. We are watching Netflix and disconnecting...

20 January, 2009

 While looking at the trend of Enterprise 2.0 software, I thought it would be interesting to see how PLM fits...

Blogroll

To the top