A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM Data Tagging Is Getting Some Traction

PLM Data Tagging Is Getting Some Traction
Oleg
Oleg
7 October, 2013 | 3 min for reading

tagging-plm-data

Tagging is one of the most popular ways to classify information. Tagging became a mainstream way to classify information in almost every web application these days. Initially introduced on photo sharing websites, tagging expanded almost everywhere. Tagging is an important feature of every “Web 2.0” solution. You can read more on wikipedia here. Here is snippet of definition.

Labeling and tagging are carried out to perform functions such as aiding in classification, marking ownership, noting boundaries, and indicating online identity. They may take the form of words, images, or other identifying marks. An analogous example of tags in the physical world is museum object tagging. In the organization of information and objects, the use of textual keywords as part of identification and classification long predates computers. However, computer based searching made the use of keywords a rapid way of exploring records.

I can divide tagging solution into two separate groups – automatic (machine) tagging and user-driven or collaborative tagging. The second one became popular on the web and called “folksonomy“. Opposite of predefined classification (taxonomy), folksonomy is a collaborative way to classify information mostly in social and web applications.

A folksonomy is a system of classification derived from the practice and method of collaboratively creating and managing tags to annotate and categorize content;[1][2] this practice is also known ascollaborative tagging,[3] social classification, social indexing, and social tagging…. [S]ome of the characteristics of folksonomies by identifying two types: broad and narrow. A broad folksonomy is one in which multiple users tag particular content with a variety of terms from a variety of vocabularies, thus creating a greater amount of metadata for that content. A narrow folksonomy, on the other hand, occurs when a few users, primarily the content creator, tag an object with a limited number of terms.

Classification is an important element of every data management and information solution. PLM/PDM systems are (obviously) included. In my view, tagging can reduce the complexity of information search and discovery. I’ve been pitching “Tagging” as an innovative way to simplify data access in PLM systems. Navigate to my historical blog from 2009 – How Tagging can prevent PLM from a Compulsive Obsessive Disorder Problem?

Until now, I haven’t heard about any implementation of tagging in PLM systems. Earlier today, I was reading CIMdata update about Dassault Enovia products – ENOVIA Product Update: A CIMdata Highlight. One of the snippet of this publication referenced to a new solution produced by Dassault – IFWE Compass. Here is a passage speaking about “automatic tagging solution”:

The IFWE Compass user interface—This new face of the 3DEXPERIENCE platform was shown briefly at the June Industry Analyst event, but this daylong session allowed us to see it support many more use cases. The automatic tagging and indexing of all managed information (called 6W) should provide significant benefits downstream. This tagging approach is not seen in offerings from other PLM solution providers.

What is my conclusion? Despite visible simplicity, tagging is hard task to accomplish. It required significant amount of data processing, computational power and sophisticated algorithms. It is hard to get it done automatically and it requires specific “collaborative” effort to apply it in a “folksonmical” way. My hunch Dassault acquired tagging technology from the acquisition of search vendor Exalead few years ago. The precision of tagging (especially when it done automatically) is a key. So, it would be very interesting to see implementation of this solution in a specific customer data corpus. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
3 December, 2018

One of the topics of my interest is to compare between PLM and BIM. Let me put a disclaimer from...

14 May, 2009

Dear Friends,  I’d like to introduce a new type of discussion on Daily PLM Think Tank- PLM Prompt. Sometimes, I...

30 November, 2012

I just came back AU2012 in Las Vegas. Among many meetings, I had during AU, I attended Innovation Forum –...

10 March, 2015

Yesterday was a very busy day for online community of people involved in engineering and manufacturing software. Onshape, the new...

22 December, 2009

I’d like to continue discussing topics that create maximum confusion between PLM marketing and reality. Today, I want to talk...

13 May, 2013

The discussion around Google Glass is heating up. Google was very transparent by rolling out Google Glasses and providing lots...

3 May, 2011

One of my blog readers asked me few questions about managing of effectivity. I decided to share this information. In...

8 August, 2014

Process management is a very important part of any PLM software. You can find one in every PLM system. There...

27 October, 2023

In the fast moving world of manufacturing, to have company to perform to achieve a certain level of efficiency, to...

Blogroll

To the top