A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Why PLM selection is about data access problem first?

Why PLM selection is about data access problem first?
Oleg
Oleg
29 October, 2013 | 3 min for reading

plm-selection-process

How to select PLM? Manufacturing companies, industry pundits and vendors are trying to simplify this process. Nevertheless, after almost three decades, the problem is still on the table. PLM sales is value based and unfortunately requires to juggle too many people and events together. I see this process as a combination of technological choices, company practices and vendor selection.

I recently came to few notable PLM blog articles focusing on different aspects of PLM selection. My long time industry colleague and blog buddy Jos Voskuil put an article PLM Selection – Additional thoughts. Take a time and read Jos’ article – it contains many good recommendations and options to check when you trying to select PLM system such as – organizational requirements, implementation specifics, cost and even vendors FUD. The last one was interesting  and I specially liked this passage:

My recommendation to a company that gets involved in FUD during a PLM selection process, they should be worried about the company spreading the FUD. Apparently they have no stronger arguments to explain to you why they are the perfect solution; instead they tell you indirectly we are the less worst.

Another article I came across is a publication in CL2M portal. A short writeup by Scott Cleveland is interesting – Why PLM? Scott is also mentioning multiple reasons to get involved into PLM. One of them is about “looking for information” effort was caught my special attention. It comes as a first problem one of his client was trying to solve by implementing of PLM. Here is how Scott explains that:

Looking for Information: He told me about the time his engineers spend looking for ‘stuff’ [like drawings and files]. I said this is a problem everywhere. I told him there have been many studies performed analyzing the time it takes engineers to find ‘stuff’, and all of them say that, without document management software, engineers can spend as much as 25% of their time looking for ‘stuff’.

He said he couldn’t put a figure on it, but believes that could be true at his company. He also mentioned that at some point the engineer will stop looking and just recreate the missing information. He said this is a killer. First it wastes project time and second, it leads to duplicate part numbers and possible errors caused by the duplicate drawings.

All together, it made me think about how to get information access into the central place of PLM selection process. Getting access to the information from multiple devices, organization locations and at any time becomes an absolutely must requirement any vendor should answer before getting into future PLM evaluation. Otherwise, you will be sinking into people inefficiency every day.

What is my conclusion? We live in the era when access to information becomes mission critical. Your design can lead to much more expensive options. You can potentially select wrong supplier. You can miss delivery dates. However, the most important is to note time aspect. Engineers are spending lots of time looking for “stuff”. This is the problem nobody can tolerate any more. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
8 June, 2012

Earlier this week, Kenesto – new outfit of Mike Payne announced about general availability of their cloud based business process...

19 June, 2019

Many years ago, I’ve been following research papers of George J. Klir related to system approach in solving problems. My...

13 August, 2010

I was thinking about how PLM balance product lifecycle from the standpoint of producing and consuming product data. The product...

24 November, 2020

SaaS is a topic of many debates in the PLM industry these days. Back in the 2010s, the question was...

26 January, 2016

Workflow is an easy to get paradigm. You draw the chart. It is logical and shows you how things are...

11 February, 2009

Directly from SolidWorks World   In my previous posts, I discussed the technological possibility of leveraging the social platform capability...

26 January, 2025

I’m preparing for Dassault 3DEXPERIENCE World 2025 in a little bit less then a month. The event links is here...

11 October, 2019

Yesterday evening I attended the first Onshape Boston User Group meeting. The meeting was organized in the Onshape office in...

25 July, 2017

My recent discussions about adoption of Product Lifecycle Management in different segments of manufacturing industries made me think that status...

Blogroll

To the top