A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

How long will take GrabCAD to develop full-blown PLM solution?

How long will take GrabCAD to develop full-blown PLM solution?
Oleg
Oleg
18 August, 2014 | 2 min for reading

grabcad-plm-beyondplm

Time is running fast. It has been two years since I posted GrabCAD: from Facebook for engineers to PLM. If you are in the engineering community, the chances you will come to PLM are very high. Like in the past all roads lead to Rome, I guess all future development roads for PDM solution lead to PLM. Even if you don’t like to brand your solution as PLM… Nevertheless, if it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck and walks like a duck, it’s a duck.

Just few months ago, GrabCAD moved into “PDM” segment by introducing GrabCAD Workbench. Earlier today, GrabCAD made another “quack” towards PLM by adding BOM support. Navigate your browser to the following link to read – BOMs Away! Workbench Adds BOM Management. The following passage outlines what GrabCAD BOM can do today:

We’ve added an easy-to-use BOM export capability to Workbench, enabling any Workbench user to generate a Bill of Materials with just a few clicks. This means that your engineering team and manufacturing team will always be on the same page. Now your purchasing manager or supplier liaison doesn’t need to bother a CAD engineer to generate a BOM, and doesn’t need to enter items individually into Excel each time you change a revision. It’s as simple as two clicks to get the list of components into Excel!

grabCAD-bom-plm

Introducing BOM functionality is a very logical step many PDM systems did. However, it doesn’t come easy. The complexity of system is growing. From what I can see now GrabCAD is an early beginning and just touching BOM functionality to balance customers demand and complexity of full-blown BOM management solution.

What is my conclusion? To extract BOM from CAD drawing is a very neat functionality. My hunch it was requested by many GrabCAD users. However, BOM functionality introduction was a challenge for many PDM systems in the past. The complexity of Part management, multiple BOMs – this is only two visible parts of the iceberg. GrabCAD strategy reminded me what SolidWorks did in the past with PDM – added functionality when it was absolutely requested by majority of customers. I think it worked for SolidWorks… It would be interesting to see how it will work for GrabCAD. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
20 October, 2011

There are many discussions these days going around cloud and confrontation between large technological companies. If you miss the following...

20 June, 2021

Last month, I published a series of articles about PLM and ERP exploring the war between both systems for data...

11 May, 2016

Collaboration was an important element in the development of product lifecycle technologies. First PDM and PLM systems allowed to control...

25 April, 2019

Going back in 2011 when I attended ACE 2011, I captured Aras idea and vision in my article – Aras...

25 December, 2015

My recent article “What is wrong with PLM of Things? led me to have discussions online and offline about integration of IoT and...

20 February, 2022

In the world of business, technology is ever-evolving. With new advancements in software and hardware, businesses are able to operate...

11 March, 2011

Are you familiar with the “Killer App” syndrome? In my view, conversations about a “Killer App” are very popular when...

15 January, 2009

For many years, data management was considered as something that burdens the activity of designers and engineers focused on CAD...

30 March, 2011

For the last few months, I’ve been asked multiple times about the role of Enterprise search and PLM. Since last...

Blogroll

To the top