A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Why PLM need a better search for IoT data?

Why PLM need a better search for IoT data?
Oleg
Oleg
2 October, 2014 | 2 min for reading

thing-search-4

I’m learning a lot these days about IoT. The amount of connected devices around us is growing and it raises lot of questions – how to store data produced by devices, what is the value of the information captured from variety of sensors and machines as well as how to make sense of this information. Google is part of Oxford dictionary. The last two decades of web taught us that good search is one of the fundamental elements of getting well with large amount of data.

My attention caught by GigaOM article Thingful upgrades its search engine for the internet of things. Thingful – a company that trying to make IoT searchable exactly in the way Google allows us to search web today. You can navigate to Thingful website and check by yourself.

Below you can see some of my experiments with browsing and searching things in Boston, MA as well as in my neighborhood.

thing-search-1

thing-search-2

thing-search-3

So, why PLM vendors should care? Search is clearly part of modern user experience in every system. IoT brings many new challenges such as gigantic data corpus, frequency of updates and new user experience challenges. It will probably requires more analytic approach rather than just “search experience”. I can imagine designer ability to research existing product behavior or requirements coming directly from products in the field.

In my previous posts I discussed the potential IoT data will blow up traditional PLM databases. The ability to search for a huge IoT data corpus is part of that. However, one of the biggest opportunity in the intersection of IoT and PLM is to extend product lifecycle management from engineering and manufacturing stages into the field of physical products.

What is my conclusion? We are getting in a very interesting phase when PLM has a potential to connect physical objects with virtual models. It changes the way we manage product lifecycle by extending reach and ability to handle more data. It will require better data management and search technologies. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
15 May, 2010

This is a weekend post. I was trying to find a way to present in one page what I’m blogging...

1 December, 2019

I’ve been following Autodesk development in PDM and PLM space for the last decade. You can check some of my...

2 March, 2019

Earlier this week my attention was caught by Siemens PLM tweet message claiming the definition of low-cost PLM. Check this...

31 January, 2022

In a previous blog post, I shared my thoughts about Metaverse and PLM user experience. Check this out here. PLM...

24 August, 2010

I’m continuing to explore various aspects of relations between PLM and social systems and tools in my blog. The social...

5 July, 2020

SaaS is finally coming to PLM. After years of debates about cloud adoption and different flavors of the cloud architecture...

20 June, 2014

It has been a year since I published my How to select PDM system in 5 simple steps? Engineering.com article The...

7 January, 2016

The nice thing about standards is that there are so many to chose from. Engineering.com article Moving Towards Product Innovation...

29 December, 2022

Manufacturers across the globe are continuing to push forward with transformational digital initiatives, recognizing the need to adapt their operations...

Blogroll

To the top