A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Why PLM need a better search for IoT data?

Why PLM need a better search for IoT data?
Oleg
Oleg
2 October, 2014 | 2 min for reading

thing-search-4

I’m learning a lot these days about IoT. The amount of connected devices around us is growing and it raises lot of questions – how to store data produced by devices, what is the value of the information captured from variety of sensors and machines as well as how to make sense of this information. Google is part of Oxford dictionary. The last two decades of web taught us that good search is one of the fundamental elements of getting well with large amount of data.

My attention caught by GigaOM article Thingful upgrades its search engine for the internet of things. Thingful – a company that trying to make IoT searchable exactly in the way Google allows us to search web today. You can navigate to Thingful website and check by yourself.

Below you can see some of my experiments with browsing and searching things in Boston, MA as well as in my neighborhood.

thing-search-1

thing-search-2

thing-search-3

So, why PLM vendors should care? Search is clearly part of modern user experience in every system. IoT brings many new challenges such as gigantic data corpus, frequency of updates and new user experience challenges. It will probably requires more analytic approach rather than just “search experience”. I can imagine designer ability to research existing product behavior or requirements coming directly from products in the field.

In my previous posts I discussed the potential IoT data will blow up traditional PLM databases. The ability to search for a huge IoT data corpus is part of that. However, one of the biggest opportunity in the intersection of IoT and PLM is to extend product lifecycle management from engineering and manufacturing stages into the field of physical products.

What is my conclusion? We are getting in a very interesting phase when PLM has a potential to connect physical objects with virtual models. It changes the way we manage product lifecycle by extending reach and ability to handle more data. It will require better data management and search technologies. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
7 September, 2010

How to make people to work more efficiently? I think this is an important question. This is a challenge for...

9 March, 2015

This morning Onshape went from stealth mode into a public beta release. I’ve been using Onshape for the last few...

23 June, 2016

Unless you live under a rock, I’m sure you’ve heard about one of the largest acquisitions in tech world – Microsoft...

22 September, 2011

The second day of Autodesk Forum in Moscow. Today, I gave my presentation about PLM Trends and Solution Alternatives. You...

4 September, 2014

Collaboration is critical functions in PLM applications. To unlock the potential of social collaboration for engineers is a dream of...

11 January, 2019

Silos. We’ve heard this word many time. For many years, PLM sales pitch was to eliminate silos and create a...

20 January, 2019

I’m just getting up to speed with my video blog creation. There are so many topics I want to cover,...

10 April, 2018

If you always do what you always did, you’ll always get what you always got. Often Henry Ford is credited...

5 July, 2010

Last week I wrote about PLM and Open Source Big Games. One of my conclusions was that PLM Open Source...

Blogroll

To the top