A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Why PLM need a better search for IoT data?

Why PLM need a better search for IoT data?
Oleg
Oleg
2 October, 2014 | 2 min for reading

thing-search-4

I’m learning a lot these days about IoT. The amount of connected devices around us is growing and it raises lot of questions – how to store data produced by devices, what is the value of the information captured from variety of sensors and machines as well as how to make sense of this information. Google is part of Oxford dictionary. The last two decades of web taught us that good search is one of the fundamental elements of getting well with large amount of data.

My attention caught by GigaOM article Thingful upgrades its search engine for the internet of things. Thingful – a company that trying to make IoT searchable exactly in the way Google allows us to search web today. You can navigate to Thingful website and check by yourself.

Below you can see some of my experiments with browsing and searching things in Boston, MA as well as in my neighborhood.

thing-search-1

thing-search-2

thing-search-3

So, why PLM vendors should care? Search is clearly part of modern user experience in every system. IoT brings many new challenges such as gigantic data corpus, frequency of updates and new user experience challenges. It will probably requires more analytic approach rather than just “search experience”. I can imagine designer ability to research existing product behavior or requirements coming directly from products in the field.

In my previous posts I discussed the potential IoT data will blow up traditional PLM databases. The ability to search for a huge IoT data corpus is part of that. However, one of the biggest opportunity in the intersection of IoT and PLM is to extend product lifecycle management from engineering and manufacturing stages into the field of physical products.

What is my conclusion? We are getting in a very interesting phase when PLM has a potential to connect physical objects with virtual models. It changes the way we manage product lifecycle by extending reach and ability to handle more data. It will require better data management and search technologies. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
5 April, 2020

Over the course of the last few years, digital transformation was a topic of many discussions. While there is a...

31 August, 2011

I’ve been attending SolidWorks Media day in Dassault SolidWorks campus in Concord, MA. Actually, I noted- this is probably the...

3 December, 2017

Digital era brings new terminology – digital transformation. Very tasteful and nice term. I love it as much as I...

5 August, 2023

What is PLM? This question is accompany the product lifecycle management business for the last 20+ years. Started as a...

11 May, 2016

Collaboration was an important element in the development of product lifecycle technologies. First PDM and PLM systems allowed to control...

15 December, 2021

Change is the only constant thing in product development. Therefore, one of the most popular questions everyone wants to answer...

28 June, 2019

There are many definitions of PLM. In a different time, companies put emphasis on different letters. It was a time...

15 February, 2013

Cloud is trending and we can see more examples of how cloud technologies applies in business. PLM vendors are not...

25 October, 2012

I’m in Atlanta these days attending PLM Innovation Americas conference. Today is the first day, and I’m still expecting many...

Blogroll

To the top