A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Why PLM need a better search for IoT data?

Why PLM need a better search for IoT data?
Oleg
Oleg
2 October, 2014 | 2 min for reading

thing-search-4

I’m learning a lot these days about IoT. The amount of connected devices around us is growing and it raises lot of questions – how to store data produced by devices, what is the value of the information captured from variety of sensors and machines as well as how to make sense of this information. Google is part of Oxford dictionary. The last two decades of web taught us that good search is one of the fundamental elements of getting well with large amount of data.

My attention caught by GigaOM article Thingful upgrades its search engine for the internet of things. Thingful – a company that trying to make IoT searchable exactly in the way Google allows us to search web today. You can navigate to Thingful website and check by yourself.

Below you can see some of my experiments with browsing and searching things in Boston, MA as well as in my neighborhood.

thing-search-1

thing-search-2

thing-search-3

So, why PLM vendors should care? Search is clearly part of modern user experience in every system. IoT brings many new challenges such as gigantic data corpus, frequency of updates and new user experience challenges. It will probably requires more analytic approach rather than just “search experience”. I can imagine designer ability to research existing product behavior or requirements coming directly from products in the field.

In my previous posts I discussed the potential IoT data will blow up traditional PLM databases. The ability to search for a huge IoT data corpus is part of that. However, one of the biggest opportunity in the intersection of IoT and PLM is to extend product lifecycle management from engineering and manufacturing stages into the field of physical products.

What is my conclusion? We are getting in a very interesting phase when PLM has a potential to connect physical objects with virtual models. It changes the way we manage product lifecycle by extending reach and ability to handle more data. It will require better data management and search technologies. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
15 April, 2013

I’ve been attended COFES 2013 earlier last week. For those of you not familiar with the event, navigate your browser...

7 February, 2014

Few years ago, I got a problem with automatic transmission of our Honda Odyssey. The funny part of the story...

15 April, 2010

I think, Enterprise Software is not simple. And Product Lifecycle Management is not an exception and even one of the most...

11 November, 2011

Few months ago, I had a chance to write an article about PLM and comprehensive search. It was about enterprise...

5 April, 2013

Working with engineers is like herding cats. Try to put few engineers in a room and get an agreement. If...

24 May, 2017

PLM definition is one of these questions that often come in the discussions between industry analysts, bloggers and PLM pundits. While...

8 July, 2015

To manage business processes across the manufacturing organization is not a simple job. This is a problem product lifecycle management...

21 January, 2009

Collaboration and Process Management is obviously a very important part of Product Lifecycle Management. But does it really target successful...

31 August, 2009

Interesting prompt today came out of Google’s US7,580,568 “Methods and Systems for Identifying an Image as a Representative Image for...

Blogroll

To the top