A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Data and Networks in Engineering Applications

Data and Networks in Engineering Applications
Oleg
Oleg
20 June, 2016 | 2 min for reading

engineering-data-networks

Cloud applications are getting better these days. However, most of existing mainstream engineering applications are still using files to store and retrieve information. Although a lot being said and done in the past about interoperability and data ownership, it is still a problem for most of organizations.

If you think about engineering use cases, data is heavily bounded to applications. Design (CAD) systems are using specific file formats to store data and this data rarely goes away and disconnects from the original applications.

Last week, I attended Autodesk Forge DevCon in San Francisco, CA. Autodesk is developing Forge platform – a set of cloud APIs that can help manage and share design data in different forms and appearances. Data is the most central element of Autodesk Forge and the question how to manage design data and transfer it between applications and devices is certainly the one that drives lot of interest from developers and users.

Autodesk CEO Carl Bass addressed this question in his Q&A keynote session. Here is a specific fragment of his answer speaking about future of data and communication in cloud environments.

Carl’s comment made me think about data networks in engineering environment. Data being held by application and PLM platforms for many years. Data should be managed and controlled.This is a reality and there is a rational to make it that way. And that’s why most of existing applications and data management systems are basically locking data in existing storages and environments.

However, data ownership by applications also brings a significant problem – it sets a boundary for data. Files, Databases, Tenants, etc. – there are many names for these boundaries. Most of them are artificial and caused by existing technologies.

To get data out of applications and to allow data access in the way engineers and applications can use this data, can be a tremendous challenge. To facilitate engineering data hand-off to set data independently can help to improve communication and effectiveness of engineering organizations.

What is my conclusion? The demand of engineering and manufacturing organization is to share data seamlessly. Designers, manufacturing engineers, supply chain managers, contractors should have an access to information. At the same time, locking them in a specific data management system or application is not an option. An existing diverse set of application will not be replaced and for the next decade we will live in the reality of mixed heterogenius cloud and desktop engineering applications Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Want to learn more about PLM? Check out my new PLM Book website.

Disclaimer: I’m co-founder and CEO of openBoM developing cloud based bill of materials and inventory management tool for manufacturing companies, hardware startups and supply chain.

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
26 April, 2017

For long time, enterprise integration is one of the biggest challenges manufacturing companies are facing during PLM implementations. PLM integration can be...

13 January, 2011

I made a short note today. Google enhanced the capability of Google Docs with embedding video playback. Navigate your browser...

28 June, 2016

For many years, customization was one of the key elements of PLM system implementation. It was a step when PLM...

14 April, 2024

In today’s rapidly evolving landscape of data management and artificial intelligence (AI), the relationship between the two is becoming increasingly...

26 July, 2012

The discussion around SolidSmack’s article PLM Should Be Like Google. Really? is heating up. My PLM blogging buddy and well-known...

16 February, 2011

I want to talk about PLM and Standards today. In my view view, the story of standards is over complicated...

20 October, 2016

  Culture eats strategy for breakfast. You probably heard the phrase usually attributed to Peter Druker. Did Peter Druker really said this?...

30 January, 2020

ROI of PLM is not measurable. To sell PLM you need to create a myth. This statement of Jos Voksuil...

17 February, 2012

This post was provoked by twitter conversation between me, Jonathan Scott of Razorleaf and Brian Roepke of Autodesk. Let me...

Blogroll

To the top