A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Graph Navigation and PLM user experience paradigms

Graph Navigation and PLM user experience paradigms
Oleg
Oleg
4 February, 2019 | 2 min for reading

Complexity of PLM systems and user experience is well-known problem in the world of PLM. Even all PLM vendors are in full agreement about focusing on user experience and user interface, it is still not enough. Few years ago, I shared my thoughts here – Lipstick on a pig. Why PLM user experience is not done yet.

The PLM experience didn’t change PLM much for the last five years. We’ve heard lot of praising how much UX and experience are important for PLM vendors. And yes, we’ve got nicer user interfaces, pretty colors and superficial marketing demos. The nuts and bolts of PLM system and experience didn’t change. Those systems are clunky and complex. Most of UX work that was done is yet another layer of software applied on top of existing platforms, data models, workflows and… technological limitations. So, it is still a UX lipstick on PLM pig for the lack of better worlds.

My favorite speech about user experience is from Steve Jobs:

For the last few years, PLM vendors many very nice demos and even products with cool user interface. However, when it comes to cohesive user experience, these products they are getting better:

My attention was caught by Aras Graph Navigation. Graph was always a very interesting paradigm that was appealing to many PLM functions. Robustness of graph was always a good match to complexity of PLM data. I found Aras graph navigation service flexible and useful for data navigation.

Aras graph approach is maybee one of the most sophisticated I’ve seen, but Aras is not alone and we can see how other PLM companies are offering similar navigation capabilities. Check the following video from ENOVIA and 3DEXPERIENCE

Another example from Siemens PLM Teamcenter. Watch this video:

Another example video from Autodesk PLM360 (current Fusion Lifecycle)

What is my conclusion? Complexity of product data created a huge demand for a better user experience in PLM products and technologies. Nice user experience is not always the best thing I’d be using for PLM technologies. Engineers aren’t using nice user interfaces. Engineers are looking for robust and simple to use tools. But simplicity is hard. Graph navigator can be a good candidate to solve complexity of PLM user experience. Just my thoughts. What do you think?

Best, Oleg

Disclaimer: I’m co-founder and CEO of OpenBOM developing cloud based bill of materials and inventory management tool for manufacturing companies, hardware startups and supply chain. My opinion can be unintentionally biased

 

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
14 October, 2019

For the last 5-7 years, we can see an increased presence of cloud technologies in enterprise and business software. For...

6 July, 2014

Cloud storage is changing fast these days. From relatively small portion of our life limited mostly by online email, cloud...

28 November, 2020

I want to come back to my conversations about the construction industry. If you’re long time readers of my blog...

15 January, 2010

I was reading Google Enterprise Blog – Store and share files in the cloud… My hunch is that PLM eco-system...

8 June, 2019

I spent the last three days at IDE 2019 – a summer school organized by Core-Lab of the University of...

24 July, 2013

Social tools are capturing lots of noise and making real impact these days. After initial hype of MySpace and early...

31 July, 2009

My new blog post of DS 3D Perspectives Blog. From 1998 searches circa to Search Media, Tag Results, View Examples....

16 August, 2018

Digital transformation seems to be inevitable goal for enterprise companies these days. Manufacturing companies of different types and sizes are...

16 May, 2019

Financial information is not a typical topic in my articles. However, in a spirit of diversity in the thinking process,...

Blogroll

To the top