A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

3DEXPERIENCE cloud – pros, cons, nuts and bolts…

3DEXPERIENCE cloud – pros, cons, nuts and bolts…
Oleg
Oleg
30 May, 2019 | 3 min for reading

Remember a few years ago, we had many discussions about PLM cloud. This is just one example of my article from 2016 – Chasing the right PLM cloud. Fast forward in 2019 and we are past PLM cloud wars. The time of cloud vs no-cloud debates are over and vendors are full speed ahead in the development of the option that fits their market in the best way. So, you can see how some CAD/PLM companies are focusing more on public cloud (e.g. Onshape, Autodesk, etc) and how some others are paying much more attention to private and hosted versions (PTC, Siemens PLM).

Among all CAD and PLM providers, I found Dassault System 3DEXPERIENCE one of the most interesting. 3DEXPERIENCE is giving you the largest number of possible options and permutations – public cloud, private cloud, and on-premise. Also by announcing 3DEXPERIENCE.Works on Solidworks World 2019, DS is planning to become a broad provider of a platform for the highest diversity of customers – from the lowest range of single Solidworks users to the highest range of enterprise PLM solutions.

How it will work is a very good question and I was trying to get the answer on how to benchmark and compare different packages of 3DEXPERIENCE. In such a context, I found xLM article Which 3DEXPERIENCE platform works best for you very interesting. Navigate to the article and have a read.

I captured a few interesting points from the article that can help you to make a decision.

1- IT resources. Moving down from DS public cloud to private options and on-premise will demand more IT work – hardware, maintenance, configuration, upgrades.

2- Flexibility. Moving up from on-premise to private and after that public cloud, you will be losing configuration, flexibility, and ability of the system to be adapted.

3- Integrations. Moving up from on-premise to the public then public cloud, you will be losing options to upload data and integrate with other systems.

As much as I liked xLM article, I didn’t find information and links about few important points:

– Price and subscription options.

In the world of SaaS software, companies are usually transparent about subscriptions cost and configurations. I navigated to the 3DEXPERIENCE cloud, but I wasn’t able to find the cost. Everything I found was about leaving contact information and asking sales to contact me.

– Public cloud cross tenant application data access

Having an application to run on the public cloud has one huge advantage. It means you have a better way to communicate with other companies using the same platform. I didn’t find any evidence that such cross tenant access is available on any of these cloud solutions.

– Interoperability between multiple clouds

It is not clear what 3DEXPERIENCE can offer to communicate between different options. For example, your customer is running 3DEXPERIENCE on-premise, but at the same time, suppliers are using the public cloud version.

What is my conclusion? 3DEXPERIENCE seems to have many cloud deployment options. Even so, it is missing some very critical aspects of collaboration and flexibility, which is so essential in the modern manufacturing world. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Disclaimer: I’m co-founder and CEO of OpenBOM developing cloud-based bill of materials and inventory management tool for manufacturing companies, hardware startups, and supply chain. My opinion can be unintentionally biased.

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
25 September, 2022

Develop3D article The Future of CAD brings up a discussion with the representatives of leading CAD vendors and a few...

18 December, 2008

 I was looking at the evolution of content-based communication and found the association between micro-blogging and micro-content interesting. The idea...

2 April, 2023

PLM Conferences are coming back in 2023 and I started to put them back on my calendar. You can watch...

3 June, 2016

Integration is hard. Especially when it comes to such complex environment as engineering and manufacturing. Zerowait-state article PLM Dilemma and...

17 August, 2020

I’ve been following the Autodesk platform and PLM development for many years. Autodesk was the first large company that endorsed...

13 February, 2014

Our information life is getting more complicated these days. The time when our digital channel was limited to our desktop...

14 April, 2016

Manufacturing companies are owning large volumes of engineering data in CAD files, PDF and other formats derivatives from design. One...

21 February, 2021

The data is a new oil. This is a mantra of modern business, products, and technologies. Big tech companies built...

5 May, 2011

I’m following SharePoint and PLM. One of point of my interest was to analyze how Microsoft SharePoint can be used...

Blogroll

To the top