A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM vs. BPM or What do you think about IBM PDIF?

PLM vs. BPM or What do you think about IBM PDIF?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
2 July, 2009 | 2 min for reading

ibm-pdifIn one of my previous posts, I raised the question if PLM needs to develop its own process tools. Looking at the few announcements made by IBM and Siemens PLM, I asked myself the following question again:  Where is PLM going regarding the implementation of Business Process Management (BPM) and SOA related frameworks? For the moment, I have more questions than answer, but my basic assumptions follow:

  1. From the PLM standpoint, business processes (or collaborative business processes) are a significant portion of what enterprise PLM does.
  2. There are about 100 companies in the world that are doing something more or less associated with Business Process Management (analysts normally talk about 10-20 top players).
  3. Pure BPM players are rarely involved into PLM implementations; PLM companies normally provide workflow and process functionality by themselves.

Comparing PLM and BPM process capabilities, I have concluded that:

  1. PLM provides a very good product-oriented workflow, but is relatively weak in enterprise functions and administration, and other middleware components.
  2. The BPM offering is always more agile and more generic compared to PLM business processes.
  3. BPM normally provides connectivity adapters… and for PLM products too.

The very interesting piece of IBM PDIF framework is related to IBM Web Sphere Process Server and additional process-oriented middleware components. I wonder what combination of PLM software from Siemens PLM will support the process components of PDIF and how they will work together. Similar frameworks are available with other big enterprise stakeholders such as Microsoft, SAP, and Oracle. How can their respectful products provide similar functionality?

Speaking broadly about PLM and BPM, I found the following questions interesting.

  1. Will PLM follow the traditional path and continue to develop BPM components to make their PLM Process technologies stronger?
  2. Will PLM vendors be interested in the acquisition of one of the available BPM pure players to get more “process stuff” on board?
  3. Will PLM adjust more to the BPM capabilities of large enterprise and platform vendors?

I look forward to your comments and opinions.

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
13 January, 2012

Remember my post few weeks ago about PLM highway? Boston is certainly a place where you can see a concentration of...

28 August, 2022

My attention was caught by the GrabCAD blog announcing a fond farewell to GrabCAD Workbench. I’ve been following GrabCAD for...

6 November, 2013

Engineering software has a long history of aggregation and disaggregation. In CAD, it was long time about new features vendors...

17 September, 2010

I’ve been attending Technia PLM Innovation Forum early this week in Stockholm. My conclusion from this forum is that all...

9 October, 2012

In the world of cloud applications, there is a magic term “multi-tenancy” that usually raises many debates. A couple of...

1 October, 2019

One of the most debated topics in PLM (and other enterprise software world) is so-called “Out-of-the-box” system. Long-time ago, PDM...

11 March, 2016

Social was once was a hot topic in PLM industry eco-system. The use of social networks is increasing. The latest...

8 May, 2019

I attended the Digital Factory 2019 event yesterday in Boston organized by Formlabs. The event took place in Boston Cruise...

14 June, 2012

Talk to somebody about how to implement enterprise software… What is the first thing that comes to your mind? It...

Blogroll

To the top