A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM vs. BPM or What do you think about IBM PDIF?

PLM vs. BPM or What do you think about IBM PDIF?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
2 July, 2009 | 2 min for reading

ibm-pdifIn one of my previous posts, I raised the question if PLM needs to develop its own process tools. Looking at the few announcements made by IBM and Siemens PLM, I asked myself the following question again:  Where is PLM going regarding the implementation of Business Process Management (BPM) and SOA related frameworks? For the moment, I have more questions than answer, but my basic assumptions follow:

  1. From the PLM standpoint, business processes (or collaborative business processes) are a significant portion of what enterprise PLM does.
  2. There are about 100 companies in the world that are doing something more or less associated with Business Process Management (analysts normally talk about 10-20 top players).
  3. Pure BPM players are rarely involved into PLM implementations; PLM companies normally provide workflow and process functionality by themselves.

Comparing PLM and BPM process capabilities, I have concluded that:

  1. PLM provides a very good product-oriented workflow, but is relatively weak in enterprise functions and administration, and other middleware components.
  2. The BPM offering is always more agile and more generic compared to PLM business processes.
  3. BPM normally provides connectivity adapters… and for PLM products too.

The very interesting piece of IBM PDIF framework is related to IBM Web Sphere Process Server and additional process-oriented middleware components. I wonder what combination of PLM software from Siemens PLM will support the process components of PDIF and how they will work together. Similar frameworks are available with other big enterprise stakeholders such as Microsoft, SAP, and Oracle. How can their respectful products provide similar functionality?

Speaking broadly about PLM and BPM, I found the following questions interesting.

  1. Will PLM follow the traditional path and continue to develop BPM components to make their PLM Process technologies stronger?
  2. Will PLM vendors be interested in the acquisition of one of the available BPM pure players to get more “process stuff” on board?
  3. Will PLM adjust more to the BPM capabilities of large enterprise and platform vendors?

I look forward to your comments and opinions.

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
23 October, 2019

Digital Transformation is in the air. Every company these days is transforming itself into a future digital universe. There are...

17 October, 2019

Cloud is here. Most industries are not questioning cloud technologies, applications and business models. But, in manufacturing and PLM, the...

27 July, 2015

I keep following new cloud software outfit Fra.me. Few months ago, at Siemens PLM conference, I’ve seen how SolidEdge runs...

11 May, 2019

I missed CIMdata Industry Forum this year in Ann Arbor. So, I’m catching up these days on the topic of...

6 February, 2009

Let’s start with a strange question – how many “Ps” are there in PLM? Frankly, speaking, I don’t know. I...

14 October, 2010

Few days ago I had a chance to speak with Hardi Meybaum of GrabCAD. We spent almost two hours speaking about...

16 March, 2013

Last week I posted about changing faces of product development following PI Congress in Berlin. One of the conclusions I’ve...

3 January, 2021

The year 2021 is finally here. I’ve been taking some time off, to think about what we learned in 2020...

22 October, 2012

I’m going to attend PLM Innovation Americas event later this week in Atlanta, GA. This is going to be my...

Blogroll

To the top