A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

How to move from PLM Legacy to PLM 2.0?

How to move from PLM Legacy to PLM 2.0?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
9 July, 2009 | 1 min for reading

2.0-largeI think enterprise software is a lot about lifecycle. Most of enterprise software projects have a long implementation lifecycle; require time for  implementation, deployment and training. Following modern 2.0 trends, PLM 2.0 is expecting to change this trend, provide more agile, open and lean the environment. In other words, “PLM 2.0 offers industry what Web 2.0 offers the general public”. But I’m asking myself… how will it happen tomorrow? Product Lifecycle Management is not a tool, like a mobile phone, a laptop or even database server that can be replaced. PLM is software that accumulates corporate knowledge, processes and intellectual property. How companies will be able to move from today’s legacy to tomorrow’s PLM 2.0?

I think that the following PLM capabilities might enable future move from PLM Legacy to PLM 2.0:

1. IP Representation

Today’s PLM system accumulates a lot of product knowledge. Future coming system needs to manage this IP and be able to absorb existing corporate knowledge. Similar to the new CAD system which needs to be able to open models created by previous CAD, PLM 2.0 needs to be able to work with IP created by current PLM/PDM system.

2. Process Streamlining

From my point of view, organizational processes  can not be changed in one day; many of today’s PLM implementations were not successful because they have tried to change the way companies had been working, in one day. This is impossible, in my view. So, PLM 2.0 needs to be capable to handle process transition in an organization.

3. Granularity.

I don’t see PLM 2.0 as a big universal tool. I believe PLM 2.0 needs to be deployed step by step and optimize existing PLM and enterprise environment in organization.

So, these are my thoughts about PLM 2.0 transformation. What are your opinions about them? I’d be happy to discuss.

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
29 October, 2009

The new release of SolidWorks Labs Threehouse V2 hit me to think again about Top Down approach and efficient communication...

11 December, 2021

Earlier this week, I attended the panel discussion Creating a Digital Enterprise: What are the Challenges and Where to Start?...

6 April, 2019

I spent last week at Oracle NetSuite event in Las Vegas –  Suite World 2019. Want to learn more –...

18 December, 2008

 I was looking at the evolution of content-based communication and found the association between micro-blogging and micro-content interesting. The idea...

29 June, 2020

I spent time over the weekend watching Siemens RealizeLIVE event recording and catching up on the news about the new...

22 October, 2013

PLM for small companies is long time debated topic. The origins of PLM business are going deep into businesses of...

7 March, 2012

One of the companies I’m watching is GrabCAD. Earlier, I was talking about GrabCAD’s idea of open CAD library and...

19 September, 2017

I was invited to give a keynote at IpX Symposium. For those of your who was involved into Configuration Management...

11 November, 2010

This week on DSCC 2010 I had a chance to learn more about what Dassault is planing as their next...

Blogroll

To the top