A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

How to move from PLM Legacy to PLM 2.0?

How to move from PLM Legacy to PLM 2.0?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
9 July, 2009 | 1 min for reading

2.0-largeI think enterprise software is a lot about lifecycle. Most of enterprise software projects have a long implementation lifecycle; require time for  implementation, deployment and training. Following modern 2.0 trends, PLM 2.0 is expecting to change this trend, provide more agile, open and lean the environment. In other words, “PLM 2.0 offers industry what Web 2.0 offers the general public”. But I’m asking myself… how will it happen tomorrow? Product Lifecycle Management is not a tool, like a mobile phone, a laptop or even database server that can be replaced. PLM is software that accumulates corporate knowledge, processes and intellectual property. How companies will be able to move from today’s legacy to tomorrow’s PLM 2.0?

I think that the following PLM capabilities might enable future move from PLM Legacy to PLM 2.0:

1. IP Representation

Today’s PLM system accumulates a lot of product knowledge. Future coming system needs to manage this IP and be able to absorb existing corporate knowledge. Similar to the new CAD system which needs to be able to open models created by previous CAD, PLM 2.0 needs to be able to work with IP created by current PLM/PDM system.

2. Process Streamlining

From my point of view, organizational processes  can not be changed in one day; many of today’s PLM implementations were not successful because they have tried to change the way companies had been working, in one day. This is impossible, in my view. So, PLM 2.0 needs to be capable to handle process transition in an organization.

3. Granularity.

I don’t see PLM 2.0 as a big universal tool. I believe PLM 2.0 needs to be deployed step by step and optimize existing PLM and enterprise environment in organization.

So, these are my thoughts about PLM 2.0 transformation. What are your opinions about them? I’d be happy to discuss.

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
4 August, 2018

I’ve been following the story of Frame (also known as Fra.me or Mainframe2) company and their virtualization technology. Frame provided...

20 May, 2023

After three years dominated by COVID-19, the world is taking cautious steps towards a semblance of normalcy. And, with that,...

19 November, 2020

Autodesk University is one of my favorite events for many years. This year it is different. Usually, the event attended...

10 August, 2025

Continuing the topic I started last week – How to make AI work for PLM, today I want to talk...

14 October, 2014

Companies are moving to cloud these days. The question vendors and customers are asking today is how do we move...

20 April, 2015

Last week at COFES 2015, I shared my thoughts and opinion about what happens between PLM and the cloud for...

26 November, 2022

Security is important. Period. However, the topic of data security and data governance was bringing a lot of controversy in...

6 December, 2019

Everyone needs data. But nobody wants to manage it. I’ve learned it for many years of working with the engineering...

16 November, 2015

More than 10 years ago, I had a conversation with one of telecom manufacturing companies in Europe. I asked –...

Blogroll

To the top