A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM-less AutoCAD Users And PLM Strategies?

PLM-less AutoCAD Users And PLM Strategies?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
25 May, 2010 | 2 min for reading

A short note on WorldCAD Access by Ralf Grabowski got my attention few days ago. In a very competitive world of PLM, Ralf’s statement “PTC will bring PLM to… AutoCAD users” sounds very provoking.

I had chance to hear multiple discussions related to this topic. The most noted, in my view, is CIMData analytical work earlier this year – CIMData Entitles Autodesk’s Evolution as a PLM supplier.

I will try to clean up this space and discuss what is potential relationships between AutoCAD and PLM.

Organization, AutoCAD Users and PLM
AutoCAD is everywhere. I remember, somebody told me- you can find AutoCAD in every manufacturing organization in the world. Because of such wide adoption, every organization decided to create some of their products related information in AutoCAD. It can be data provided by suppliers, tools design and many others. For a company that doing all in 2D, AutoCAD can be still used as a design tool. In most of the cases, this status quo is absolutely not related with the potential interest of this company in Product Lifecycle Management implementation.

ProductPoint and PLM
Windchill ProductPoint implements an interesting strategy of bundling Microsoft’s SharePoint as a tool to manage CAD data, but not only. Because of wide SharePoint adoption, ProductPoint has a potential to find a path to user’s desktops in a much easier way. From the standpoint of PLM portfolio ProductPoint is just following CAD/PLM practice to get CAD data under control and enable collaboration.

PLM vision and CAD
CAD is playing a significant role in the mindshare of the top three PLM vendors. This vision primary came from CAD direction. The first objective for this type of the implementation is to get CAD data to be managed by PLM system. In my view, this strategy is different from more business oriented strategy in PLM proposed by non-CAD PLM vendors including ERP-PLM apps. There is nothing wrong with this strategy. However, it can steer PLM implementation goals from business direction and to focus on CAD data only.

What is my conclusion? Users are more interested in a practical outcome and less in marketing strategies.There are no dedicated “AutoCAD users” in an organization. Depending on the organization, people may use AutoCAD for multiple purposes, but in a manufacturing organization AutoCAD is just another tool to accomplish a task. AutoCAD data is only part of the overall product data. I think, users can appreciate the fact CAD files comes from multiple provides can be managed by a single system. So, nothing wrong with the ability of ProductPoint to manage AutoCAD files. Will it bring PLM to AutoCAD users? My guess is not. The PLM implementation is not about how to manage CAD files. However, this is an important step in the future ability to implement PLM strategy in the company.

Just my thoughts…
Best, Oleg

Share

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
22 August, 2010

In the end of 1990s, CAD/PLM community was excited about development of Boeing 777 jet. The Boeing 777 is the first...

2 November, 2009

My new blog post on 3D PERSPECTIVES. I hope you’ll enjoy the historical perspective on 3D software usage from Dassault...

21 July, 2010

The ability to have an important engineering information reference seems to me obvious. Thanks for one of my readers, who...

1 August, 2020

Back in the old days, the phone was the primary way to get a report about customer problems. Getting a...

28 March, 2018

I shared my thoughts how collaboration technologies and product development can make a dent into current PLM development trajectories. Digital...

11 March, 2023

Onshape Live 23, the annual conference organized by PTC Onshape brought together a community of users and everyone who is...

16 June, 2009

How will PLM-related software evolve on the cloud? This is actually my question for today. How will PLM get along...

5 March, 2021

One of my earlier articles The death of MBOM and EBOM divide raised interesting debates earlier this week. You can...

6 May, 2014

Once “social” was a hot topic for PLM developer and analysts. In my view, the hype went down. Ask PLM...

Blogroll

To the top