A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Business As Usual Is Not An Option For Manufacturers

Business As Usual Is Not An Option For Manufacturers
Oleg
Oleg
26 May, 2010 | 1 min for reading

An interesting research done by Economist Intelligence Unit, sponsored by Siemens PLM Software and Microsoft. You can get this report via this link. The fundamental outcome of the report is as following is that despite general optimism, manufacturers are very concerned about the future of their business and the overall impact.

  • Producers are confident in their ability to innovate—a central aspect of high-value manufacturing—but most acknowledge they will have to continue to boost their innovative capabilities. Over the past year, 40% increased their investments in research and development, while 19% took on board more highly skilled workers.
  • However, manufacturers cite some big obstacles to innovation and new product and service development, including costs (53% of respondents), uncertainty about customer demand (39%) and lack of appropriate in-house skills (38%). To overcome some of these hurdles, many are prepared to partner in the coming year: with suppliers (57%), large corporate clients (42%), technology providers (39%) and consumers (22%).
  • Almost one in five is even prepared to partner with a rival, to share resources in the face of competition, and two-thirds say that they are already actively engaged in “open innovation”, sharing ideas with third parties rather than trying to develop them entirely in-house.
  • Many manufacturers (36% of the survey sample) are now developing products for the green market, or making their processes more eco-friendly. In some cases, this is driven by consumer demand; in others by regulatory pressure.

What, in my view, software vendors can take from this? Manufacturers will continue to be challenged and will be interested to change the way they are doing business. The most important aspect is control over the product cost and material cost. To have a solution, here can be an interesting opportunity. In the meantime, there is nothing on the horizon.

Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
10 November, 2009

Few months ago, in this post, I had chance to discuss the future of immersive CAD and Data Management. Looking...

1 May, 2014

File sync and sharing became the most requested feature to enable collaboration. The days when everybody were co-located in the...

20 May, 2024

My attention was caught by the Cambridge Semantics acquisition by Altair, a company I’ve followed since the early 2000s when...

27 April, 2011

Earlier today, I was running Beyond PLM panel discussion on ACE 2011. I’d like to say my special thank you to...

5 February, 2014

Do you know what means “hollow corporation”? My readers from UK and Europe should be familiar with the term. This...

23 July, 2013

Touch interface is changing the way we work and think. You can see it everywhere these days. Engineers are not...

2 August, 2012

Cloud PLM conversation is heating up. With all pros and cons, the opinion, I can hear very often – cloud...

3 January, 2018

Believe it or not, each manufacturing company has PLM. If your company is in the business of design, product development...

23 March, 2009

I’ve seen a growing number of publications related to Cloud Computing and all variations of SaaS / PaaS / IaaS...

Blogroll

To the top