A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM: Share Data or Die

PLM: Share Data or Die
Oleg
Oleg
22 January, 2011 | 2 min for reading

I’m still digesting a huge amount of information I learned from PLM Innovation Congress earlier this week in London. However, there is one trend that I can identify that struck me as a major one coming across all presentations and talks. I can call it “integrate and share” trend. The problem of integration and share of data is not new in manufacturing organization. The need for integration of various elements of data for product development, manufacturing and supply chain is clear. Software vendors and customers are working for on this for years. However, something new happens now that allow me to have a fresh look on this.

Integration Processes

The sound of integration needs is very loud, and you are able to see it in presentations. I put few examples of pictures I made during the event to show how customers explain their critical business issues related to integration of data and processes in organizations. In a nutshell, inability to provide smooth integration prevents streamlining of organizational processes. It appears in communication between engineering and manufacturing, sales and production, support and sales.

Share Data

The need to share data is obvious. However, data sharing was never realized in an easy way. There are multiple reasons for that. Some of them are including the nature of people (keep my data close to me), company organization (departments, hierarchy, etc.) and competition between vendors (lock-in data inside of proprietary formats and data structures). At the same the value of data sharing is obvious. Organizations are losing money, projects are going out of schedules just because of that. PLM aimed to solve this problem during the past decade. I have to note a significant success in multiple implementations I had a chance to see. I personally participated in some of them. However, the ability to share data efficiently is still more science that ordinary process.

What is my conclusion? The need to integrate and share data is urgent. However, the way organizations are doing it, reminds me space shuttle programs. There is a need to downgrade and simplify these integration efforts to become more similar to transatlantic flights or even car trips. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
29 July, 2016

Unless you’re taking digital detox, you probably heard about big news in enterprise software world – Oracle buys Netsuite. The...

28 March, 2011

Last week Autodesk made a series of significant announcements related to their 2012 product lines. Autodesk is shifting to suites....

2 August, 2010

I read news from the last week – Chrysler Group LLC contracts with Siemens PLM software for product design and development...

14 September, 2016

I will be attending Accelerate 2016 event in Boston later this week. This is a 3rd annual event Autodesk is...

30 October, 2011

I was reading Oracle journal early today. Navigate your browser to read a short article – Which Cloud Service Provider...

4 September, 2009

For years, PLM and not only PLM, but also other enterprise systems like ERP supported idea of a single backbone...

22 June, 2020

PLM industry has a new marketing darling – SaaS. It was just two weeks ago when I shared news about...

13 April, 2025

Cloud and SaaS is around for the last 20-25 years. Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) industry came late to the SaaS...

8 February, 2025

Saturday is the time to relax, think, and read. It is also a day to plan. Changes are hard and...

Blogroll

To the top