A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

5 Gallons of Processes and the future of PLMometer

5 Gallons of Processes and the future of PLMometer
Oleg
Oleg
3 August, 2012 | 2 min for reading

Free is the best future price. If you follow my blog, you probably had a chance to read this post three years ago. The world of software is very different nowadays. Trends such as open source, software as a services (SaaS), freemium – this is only a short list of new business models. Earlier this year, I had a chance to run panel discussion – The Future of PLM business models at PLM Innovation conference in Munich. You can take a look on my slides here.

One of the interesting trends these days is a shift from ownership to share and services. It happens in different fields. My best non-software example is Michelin selling miles instead of tires and Zipcar share-car service.

The following blog post by Kenesto caught my attention couple of days ago – How to price PLM in the cloud? Kenesto believes  to innovate not only in cloud process management technologies, but also in the way this technology will be sold.

We believe that the cloud encourages changes to the way process automation software can — and should be — priced. So, we started from a clean sheet of paper when we decided how to price Kenesto. We don’t have legacy “seats” to preserve or boxes to push. We’ve not only changed the way process automation software works and is delivered, we also hope we have changed (for the better) the way people buy it.

In a nutshell, Kenesto is proposing companies to pay per bundle of processes. Pricing plans are available from 100 processes/month and up to 8000 processes/month. This process model made me think a bit differently about PLM pricing and  process management, specifically. Do you want me to sell processes “by gallons” as a gas? My expectation that process management software will streamline processes in the organization. What does it mean? Improve processes doesn’t say much if company has more processes or fewer processes. Who is responsible to set “valid amount of processes” for any organization? Another question that this model generated is how to make software cost predictable. Imaging tomorrow engineer cannot open ECO because of process limit. Does it sound crazy? Who knows…

What is my conclusion? The idea of PLMometer with customer credit card connected to processes counter is an interesting one. It sounds similar to Google pay-per-click model. You can print money based on the amount of processes used by engineering and other people in the organization. Pay per click worked for Google. Will it work for Kenesto? – a good question to ask. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
19 July, 2010

My new website and blog is BeyondPLM. The original post is here. If you listened to the news stream from Microsoft...

10 February, 2016

When I was a child, I remember my parents made annual subscriptions on newspapers and magazines. Once done, I enjoyed...

11 June, 2013

Recently, I’ve been talking a lot of search paradigm and findability in PLM. In many aspects, web search changed our life....

11 March, 2014

For the last few years, I’ve been chatting about the opportunity to use Google infrastructure and tools to innovate in...

19 December, 2019

I’m a big fan of simplicity. What made me to believe in simplicity? I think it came with the experience....

20 November, 2017

One of the things that caught my attention last week at Autodesk University 2017, was Andrew Anagnost, Autodesk CEO keynote...

25 April, 2016

Process is one of the fundamental elements in existing product lifecycle system. Most of existing PLM systems are build around...

27 October, 2010

Almost 2 weeks ago, I wrote about De-confusing of PLM Collaboration. Today, I want to suggest a different angle and...

29 June, 2015

Product Lifecycle Management software is obsessed with the idea of workflow. You can see it offered by all PLM vendors. To...

Blogroll

To the top