A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM: from EGOsystem to ECOsystem

PLM: from EGOsystem to ECOsystem
Oleg
Oleg
30 November, 2012 | 2 min for reading

I just came back AU2012 in Las Vegas. Among many meetings, I had during AU, I attended Innovation Forum – The Reality of the cloud. The reality of events these days that you can attend actively by participating in social networking via Twitter. One of the tweets during the cloud presentation was Chad Jackson’s: – Think about data as an eco-system.

 

It made me think about PLM as data eco-system. Watch Gerd Leonhard presentation- The future of the internet (SoLoMo) futuristic presentation with strange title – Big Data, Big Mobile, Big Social. I found it is interesting. Navigate here to take a look.

Few slides caught my special attention in the context of PLM and Data Ecosystem discussion. One of them is related to Paul Baran research back in 1960 (way before the internet and even early PLM systems). He was pioneering some of early work related to computer networks. Navigate to the following link to read more. Here is an interesting passage:

The pioneering research of Paul Baran in the 1960s, who envisioned a communications network that would survive a major enemy attacked. The sketch shows three different network topologies described in his RAND Memorandum. The distributed network structure offered the best survivability.

Another slide that sticks in my memory was the comparison of Egosystem and Ecosystem. That slide made me laugh. Especially when I put it next to one of my previous post about PLM Egoism. Think about PLM system transformation. A year ago, during AU2011, I was talking about transformation from Database to Networks. This slide is representing the way how ego-centric PLMs need to be transformed into reliable and modern PLM eco systems.

What is my conclusion? Today’s PLM EGOsystems are not sustainable. The centralized approach made PLM implementation weak and not able to survive long term lifecycle, evolution and business changes. The result is heavy PLM systems that require propriety maintenance. Change management of these systems is either expensive or impossible. It is a time to think about data networks and networked system models. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

pictures courtesy of gleonhard presentation

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
23 July, 2015

Integration of hardware and software is a topic in mind of many manufacturing companies these days. PLM was traditionally focused...

17 June, 2010

I had chance to read Buzz message thread about ECO management, initiated by Josh Mings. I found it worth reading....

18 August, 2018

My article earlier this week about complexity and challenges of MBSE and PLM models raised a good number of comments...

18 June, 2009

I have a crazy idea to discuss today. I’d like to talk about a topic that we like very much...

20 July, 2024

The discussion about PLM as a business and PLM as a software are not new. When someone asks me about...

23 May, 2018

IoT is PLM. Remember my blog from a year ago? It was a message from PTC LiveWorx last year by...

31 March, 2017

Disruption is the hallmark of modern technology world. We are thinking and talking about it all the time. One of...

7 August, 2019

Remember old days of engineering software? It was the time of proprietary data formats and interoperability solutions. These days aren’t...

17 September, 2020

Cloud and SaaS are getting high attention these days of PLM vendors and customers. The interest is driven by many...

Blogroll

To the top