A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Customers demand openness of cloud PLM solutions

Customers demand openness of cloud PLM solutions
Oleg
Oleg
18 July, 2017 | 3 min for reading

For very long time, security was one of the top concerns stopping enterprises and manufacturing companies from adopting cloud technologies. While it is still true, the future barriers to cloud technologies and cloud PLM can be different.

The latest Internet Trends report from Mary Meeker contains a section devoted to the cloud. My attention was caught by the article – Report: Enterprises Increasingly Concerned with Cloud Vendor Lock-In. The following passage can give you an idea about the problem and trend in customer concerns.

Cloud Concerns: The 2017 report noted a shift in the primary concerns of enterprises about cloud computing from 2012 to 2015. Basically, in that timeframe, the share of survey respondents citing criteria as a top-three concern shows a shift from worries about data security and cost uncertainty to worries about vendor lock-in and compliance/governance issues.

During those four years, the percentage of respondents naming data security as a top-three concern fell from 42 percent to 35 percent. Uncertainty of costs and savings fell from a respondent percentage of 38 percent to 21 percent. Conversely, compliance/governance respondent percentage grew from 21 percent to 27 percent, while lock-in (the ability to change vendors) grew even more important, going from a respondent percentage of just 7 percent in 2012 to 22 percent in 2015.

The problem is resonating with long time issue that near and dear to the hearts of many CAD and PLM users.Vendors lock-in. It is painful. Proprietary CAD formats used by vendors many years, which allowed them to charge premium fees. But the data backbone lock-in is even worst. Data management can potentially lock users even harder than CAD format and be even more dangerous. The example of some large customers stuck with highly customized PLM solutions forever is a good reminder. The cost to escape such data platform is even higher than migration to another CAD system.

Vendors outside of CAD and PLM spaces are facing the same challenges and developing solutions that can guarantee a way for users to escape their data management environment with minimum risk. A good example of such initiative is Google Data Liberation Front. It was started almost 10 years ago and delivered Google Takeout product capable to extract data from your Google account.

What is my conclusion? In my view, customer demands and concerns about vendor and data lock-in are real. Cloud has a real opportunity to change the trajectory of proprietary engineering data management solutions. I shared some of my ideas back in 2010 in my blog  – Open Cloud and Vendor Lock-in. One of my thoughts was about building open engineering cloud. Focus on standards, openness and data disambiguation, open cloud can facilitate data exchange and data openness and can be an important factor in customer’s decision to move to cloud solutions. The potential winners will be companies investing in open platforms and not lock-in their customers in proprietary data backbones. Unfortunately, existing cloud PLM solutions have a chance to become the next mouse-trap for customers similar to what CAD format was last 20 years. Data architects and PLM strategists should take a note. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Want to learn more about PLM? Check out my new PLM Book website.

Disclaimer: I’m co-founder and CEO of openBoM developing cloud based bill of materials and inventory management tool for manufacturing companies, hardware startups and supply chain. My opinion can be unintentionally biased.

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
11 December, 2021

Earlier this week, I attended the panel discussion Creating a Digital Enterprise: What are the Challenges and Where to Start?...

10 June, 2016

The idiom “the devil is in the detail” refers to a catch or mysterious element hidden in the details, and derives...

7 May, 2014

One size doesn’t fit all. It very true especially when it comes down to PLM implementations. Once released as a...

20 August, 2020

I’m continuing to explore Siemens and SAP partnership. In my earlier articles, I touched some business aspects of partnerships. You...

12 June, 2021

PLM is the system, technology, and process at the heart of your product development. It is a central control point...

21 May, 2010

I had chance to read the story “Is PLM software OOTB Functionality a Red Herring?” by Marc Lind on Aras’...

12 February, 2023

Learning is hard. The world around us is changing and the same is happening with the process of learning. The...

15 August, 2014

Part Numbers is a fascinating topic. I’m coming back to blog about what is the best approach to manage Part...

3 February, 2022

For many manufacturers, ensuring the security and reliability of their supply chains is a top priority these days. However, it...

Blogroll

To the top