A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

What is beyond Collaboration and Process Management in PLM?

What is beyond Collaboration and Process Management in PLM?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
21 January, 2009 | 2 min for reading

Collaboration and Process Management is obviously a very important part of Product Lifecycle Management. But does it really target successful Product Lifecycle Management implementation?  Yes, I think that allowing people to collaborate and have this process organized and synchronized with all other processes in your organization is the ultimate goal of any PLM implementation. Assuming you have already done this… does it make you feel good about your implementation? More importantly, does it make you feel good about your company?  If you answered NO, (as I suspect), I’d like to discuss and raise questions to discover what is beyond Collaboration and Process Management.

 I think that decision making needs to be taken care of by Product Lifecycle Management very urgently. I’m not talking about the ability of the system to make decisions, rather the ability of the PLM system to take control over product data that will help people in decision making. In order to make this happen, PLM tools need to provide a decision-oriented environment, that will allow the user (engineer, analyst, manager) to make the appropriate decision about change, design, priority etc.

 In order to make this happen, PLM needs to step up from a process-oriented environment to a multi-domain, content oriented environment. PLM needs to manage multiple domains of data, allowing the users of  (PLM) systems to access Requirements, Engineering, Parts, Customers, Manufacturing, etc. By allowing this, PLM will give users the chance to control the most important decisions in the organization. I see this as the ultimate value of PLM, beyond collaboration between people and the management of processes. 

If you are planning on implementing PLM today, what should you put on your short list to achieve these goals? In my view, you need to invest in two areas – operational business intelligence and the integration of your PLM system with other enterprise systems. The first area will give you tools to present information to make the right decision. The second will integrate product data into connected multi-domain data sets (such as multiple Bill of Materials etc.). Achievements of these two goals will allow PLM systems to move beyond day-to-day collaboration and process activities.

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
24 March, 2015

My attention was caught by Manufacturing Trends to watch in 2015 article written by Jeff Moad at Manufacturing Leadership Community. I...

24 February, 2024

In the digital transformation era, the implementation of Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) systems has become a cornerstone for manufacturing and...

29 October, 2009

The new release of SolidWorks Labs Threehouse V2 hit me to think again about Top Down approach and efficient communication...

3 September, 2010

Manufacturers are going global these days. Nobody is surprised to have design, manufacturing and support are going across the globe....

25 November, 2017

I like Friday evenings. It is a time to relax and make some unusual reading of something completely outside of...

17 June, 2010

A very interesting survey result published by Autodesk’s Scott Sheppard in his blog. In my view, numbers are clearly showing that...

30 June, 2016

Enterprise software is infamous by its complexity. After years of preaching complexity and rich set of functions, enterprise vendors are...

20 September, 2021

Earlier today, I attended a traditional CIMdata PLM Industry and Market Forum, which CIMdata holds usually in multiple geographies. Today...

24 November, 2023

In the PLM data management, Excel has long been considered the most popular tool. As all my product lifecycle management...

Blogroll

To the top