A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

What is beyond Collaboration and Process Management in PLM?

What is beyond Collaboration and Process Management in PLM?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
21 January, 2009 | 2 min for reading

Collaboration and Process Management is obviously a very important part of Product Lifecycle Management. But does it really target successful Product Lifecycle Management implementation?  Yes, I think that allowing people to collaborate and have this process organized and synchronized with all other processes in your organization is the ultimate goal of any PLM implementation. Assuming you have already done this… does it make you feel good about your implementation? More importantly, does it make you feel good about your company?  If you answered NO, (as I suspect), I’d like to discuss and raise questions to discover what is beyond Collaboration and Process Management.

 I think that decision making needs to be taken care of by Product Lifecycle Management very urgently. I’m not talking about the ability of the system to make decisions, rather the ability of the PLM system to take control over product data that will help people in decision making. In order to make this happen, PLM tools need to provide a decision-oriented environment, that will allow the user (engineer, analyst, manager) to make the appropriate decision about change, design, priority etc.

 In order to make this happen, PLM needs to step up from a process-oriented environment to a multi-domain, content oriented environment. PLM needs to manage multiple domains of data, allowing the users of  (PLM) systems to access Requirements, Engineering, Parts, Customers, Manufacturing, etc. By allowing this, PLM will give users the chance to control the most important decisions in the organization. I see this as the ultimate value of PLM, beyond collaboration between people and the management of processes. 

If you are planning on implementing PLM today, what should you put on your short list to achieve these goals? In my view, you need to invest in two areas – operational business intelligence and the integration of your PLM system with other enterprise systems. The first area will give you tools to present information to make the right decision. The second will integrate product data into connected multi-domain data sets (such as multiple Bill of Materials etc.). Achievements of these two goals will allow PLM systems to move beyond day-to-day collaboration and process activities.

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
1 December, 2014

My recent post Social PLM: How to pull a trigger? became a trigger for me to think and discuss “social” topic...

12 June, 2017

If you’re long enough time in tech, you probably remember Knowledge Management (KM). KM emerged as a scientific discipline in...

30 January, 2017

Data is a new oil. Businesses are learning it every day. For the last 5-6 years, many businesses have moved...

28 December, 2011

Please welcome a new-old word – multiplatform. When did you hear about for the last time? For those of you...

5 June, 2015

I have an unusual post for this weekend. It is related to big data stories on my blog. Big Data...

7 June, 2020

In my What is PLM Circa 2020s article, I talk about how I see the future of PLM development. The...

21 July, 2014

Management of CAD files (PDM) is heavily associated with desktop workflows. Lots of CAD files live on engineering desktops and...

14 April, 2024

Last year, I published the article 5 Steps To Break up Monolithic PLM Architecture. Please check it out. In the...

16 July, 2010

I read the following article by Manufacturing Automation – SAP Taps Partnership for Manufacturing Software Enhancement. (you need to be a member...

Blogroll

To the top