A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Open Source: Is the Game Changing for PLM?

Open Source: Is the Game Changing for PLM?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
11 March, 2009 | 2 min for reading

In my view, open source (or more precisely –open source software) is becoming more and more visible in the business of enterprise software. 

There is an important characteristic of PLM related to business that we need to keep in mind in order to analyze the impact of open source on PLM. There is a high segmentation of customer requirements for different industries and customers needs for different types of customers. Today’s “mindset PLM leaders” still are not capable of covering the full scope of customers’ needs. This topic makes open source both attractive and disruptive for PLM.

 On one hand, when there are many common customer requirements, open source is very beneficial.  Users have an ability to submit code from all participants of open source, for example, as in a Linux system. This scale up is very significant and allows us to develop big systems according to communities of users. But, at the same time, if there are quite many different requirements this can disadvantage of open source. 

In addition, due to the high percentage of services and customization, the ability to deliver overall PLM project as services without licenses cost is a significant advantage and changes the game of PLM system implementation. So for this type of customers, open source will probably be beneficial. At the same time, smaller customers will be more interested in standardized functionality with fixed cost that will allow them to achieve their ROI goals and less interesting when implementation turns to services projects. 

My conclusion – on one hand, open source in general and open source PLM specifically brings a significant improvement in the way we create systems for our customers. These models shift the initial discussion from license selling to customer requirements. On the other hand, it’s not clear how IP protection in different organizations will allow the crowdsourcing of open sources and common delivery in this field. This happened successfully with different non-PLM software, so it’s definitely a place we need to watch in the future.

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
1 November, 2016

It has been Halloween night yesterday. This is a time to bring something spooky and scary to my blog. What’s...

26 July, 2016

Almost a decade years ago, I’ve been using HTC phone running Windows mobile operational system. The same one you see...

20 July, 2018

Last year I shared my thoughts about how to replace legacy PLM and move forward. The idea is pretty simple...

8 December, 2015

PLM implementations are usually taking long time, cost money and resources. Manufacturing companies are blaming vendors for overselling and excessive...

26 October, 2014

One of the most prominent marketing slogans in PLM and enterprise software is related to “replacement of Excel”. I have...

28 March, 2014

I’m following strategic visions of the major PLM vendors 2014+ publication by Jim Brown – well known analyst and my blogging...

29 November, 2010

I just learned that SharePoint migration projects require user’s involvement to be really successful. Navigate your browser to the following...

1 August, 2020

Back in the old days, the phone was the primary way to get a report about customer problems. Getting a...

30 April, 2009

Today I would like to discuss PLM integrations. I see PLM as a business software that heavily relies on integration....

Blogroll

To the top