A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Open Source: Is the Game Changing for PLM?

Open Source: Is the Game Changing for PLM?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
11 March, 2009 | 2 min for reading

In my view, open source (or more precisely –open source software) is becoming more and more visible in the business of enterprise software. 

There is an important characteristic of PLM related to business that we need to keep in mind in order to analyze the impact of open source on PLM. There is a high segmentation of customer requirements for different industries and customers needs for different types of customers. Today’s “mindset PLM leaders” still are not capable of covering the full scope of customers’ needs. This topic makes open source both attractive and disruptive for PLM.

 On one hand, when there are many common customer requirements, open source is very beneficial.  Users have an ability to submit code from all participants of open source, for example, as in a Linux system. This scale up is very significant and allows us to develop big systems according to communities of users. But, at the same time, if there are quite many different requirements this can disadvantage of open source. 

In addition, due to the high percentage of services and customization, the ability to deliver overall PLM project as services without licenses cost is a significant advantage and changes the game of PLM system implementation. So for this type of customers, open source will probably be beneficial. At the same time, smaller customers will be more interested in standardized functionality with fixed cost that will allow them to achieve their ROI goals and less interesting when implementation turns to services projects. 

My conclusion – on one hand, open source in general and open source PLM specifically brings a significant improvement in the way we create systems for our customers. These models shift the initial discussion from license selling to customer requirements. On the other hand, it’s not clear how IP protection in different organizations will allow the crowdsourcing of open sources and common delivery in this field. This happened successfully with different non-PLM software, so it’s definitely a place we need to watch in the future.

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
3 March, 2009

First of all, I think we need to clarify terms. Folksonomy is the term used for the classification of mechanisms...

13 August, 2010

I was thinking about how PLM balance product lifecycle from the standpoint of producing and consuming product data. The product...

21 January, 2011

During last two days I’ve been busy attending PLM Innovation Congress 2011 in London. This is a short statistic of...

11 July, 2016

In the early days of electronic and computer development, “digital” was a technology that generates, stores and process data in...

2 January, 2018

  Dear Friends, 2017 was an important, challenging and successful year for me. As we move into 2018, I wanted...

31 March, 2015

I’m returning  home from CIMdata PLM market forum in Ann Arbor. For those of you who are not familiar with...

5 July, 2020

SaaS is finally coming to PLM. After years of debates about cloud adoption and different flavors of the cloud architecture...

6 December, 2013

I just came back from Autodesk University 2013 that took place earlier this week in freezing  Las Vegas. One of...

24 November, 2009

Reading Jim Brown’s blog post “Choosing an ERP to Fit PLM?”, I started to ask myself why these systems fit...

Blogroll

To the top