A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

How to move from PLM Legacy to PLM 2.0?

How to move from PLM Legacy to PLM 2.0?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
9 July, 2009 | 1 min for reading

2.0-largeI think enterprise software is a lot about lifecycle. Most of enterprise software projects have a long implementation lifecycle; require time for  implementation, deployment and training. Following modern 2.0 trends, PLM 2.0 is expecting to change this trend, provide more agile, open and lean the environment. In other words, “PLM 2.0 offers industry what Web 2.0 offers the general public”. But I’m asking myself… how will it happen tomorrow? Product Lifecycle Management is not a tool, like a mobile phone, a laptop or even database server that can be replaced. PLM is software that accumulates corporate knowledge, processes and intellectual property. How companies will be able to move from today’s legacy to tomorrow’s PLM 2.0?

I think that the following PLM capabilities might enable future move from PLM Legacy to PLM 2.0:

1. IP Representation

Today’s PLM system accumulates a lot of product knowledge. Future coming system needs to manage this IP and be able to absorb existing corporate knowledge. Similar to the new CAD system which needs to be able to open models created by previous CAD, PLM 2.0 needs to be able to work with IP created by current PLM/PDM system.

2. Process Streamlining

From my point of view, organizational processes  can not be changed in one day; many of today’s PLM implementations were not successful because they have tried to change the way companies had been working, in one day. This is impossible, in my view. So, PLM 2.0 needs to be capable to handle process transition in an organization.

3. Granularity.

I don’t see PLM 2.0 as a big universal tool. I believe PLM 2.0 needs to be deployed step by step and optimize existing PLM and enterprise environment in organization.

So, these are my thoughts about PLM 2.0 transformation. What are your opinions about them? I’d be happy to discuss.

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
9 September, 2009

During last week, I had chance to discuss PLM, Design and Business Process trends. The core idea behind was about...

25 August, 2010

Have you had a chance to see any PLM strategic presentation? I’m sure you did. You can find easy few...

15 October, 2010

What do you think about “Collaboration”? I think, it confusing a bit. We use it too often. Some people like...

24 October, 2013

Manufacturing is going global. This is not about the future. This is a reality of all manufacturing companies today. So,...

15 August, 2011

As you probably know, I’m collecting PLM definitions coming out of vendors, industry analysts and just customers. Here are some...

5 February, 2012

Social is one of the topics I’m discussing frequently on my blog. Today, I would like to take a different...

12 September, 2021

As products are getting more complex and connected, the question of what systems are needed to support such complex development...

27 November, 2011

The story of standards is always fascinating. I love these stories on my blog and spent quite a lot of...

14 October, 2011

Yesterday I spent my day on Dassault PLM Forum in Moscow. The event website is here. You can see the...

Blogroll

To the top