A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

How to move from PLM Legacy to PLM 2.0?

How to move from PLM Legacy to PLM 2.0?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
9 July, 2009 | 1 min for reading

2.0-largeI think enterprise software is a lot about lifecycle. Most of enterprise software projects have a long implementation lifecycle; require time for  implementation, deployment and training. Following modern 2.0 trends, PLM 2.0 is expecting to change this trend, provide more agile, open and lean the environment. In other words, “PLM 2.0 offers industry what Web 2.0 offers the general public”. But I’m asking myself… how will it happen tomorrow? Product Lifecycle Management is not a tool, like a mobile phone, a laptop or even database server that can be replaced. PLM is software that accumulates corporate knowledge, processes and intellectual property. How companies will be able to move from today’s legacy to tomorrow’s PLM 2.0?

I think that the following PLM capabilities might enable future move from PLM Legacy to PLM 2.0:

1. IP Representation

Today’s PLM system accumulates a lot of product knowledge. Future coming system needs to manage this IP and be able to absorb existing corporate knowledge. Similar to the new CAD system which needs to be able to open models created by previous CAD, PLM 2.0 needs to be able to work with IP created by current PLM/PDM system.

2. Process Streamlining

From my point of view, organizational processes  can not be changed in one day; many of today’s PLM implementations were not successful because they have tried to change the way companies had been working, in one day. This is impossible, in my view. So, PLM 2.0 needs to be capable to handle process transition in an organization.

3. Granularity.

I don’t see PLM 2.0 as a big universal tool. I believe PLM 2.0 needs to be deployed step by step and optimize existing PLM and enterprise environment in organization.

So, these are my thoughts about PLM 2.0 transformation. What are your opinions about them? I’d be happy to discuss.

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
16 September, 2015

Buzzwords is one of the funniest things in enterprise software. PLM industry is guilty many times for overused buzzword lingo....

28 May, 2010

I had chance to read a very interesting blog by Fracois Guillaumin related to SOA and PLM. He writes about roots...

15 May, 2023

The topic of “intelligent part numbers” (IPN) came across again. This time it caught my attention via the post on...

23 September, 2024

Open Source PLM topic was coming in my blog a few times in the past. The topic was quite popular...

14 August, 2018

Aras’ presentation by Pawel Chadzynski MBSE and the Business of Engineering brings some interesting perspective of what Aras is thinking about...

11 January, 2013

Bill of Materials. Probably the key element in product development and manufacturing. Surprisingly enough, many companies are still struggling with...

7 December, 2011

Back to the beginning of this year, I came with the post – Integrating PLM and PDM. Wrong question? My...

8 April, 2012

Do you think PLM software must be cool? More than two years ago, I posted FREE and COOL trends in...

25 October, 2018

Earlier today, Arena PLM shared the news about acquisition of Omnify Software. Omnify Software mentioned on thier twitter account – we...

Blogroll

To the top