A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

How to move from PLM Legacy to PLM 2.0?

How to move from PLM Legacy to PLM 2.0?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
9 July, 2009 | 1 min for reading

2.0-largeI think enterprise software is a lot about lifecycle. Most of enterprise software projects have a long implementation lifecycle; require time for  implementation, deployment and training. Following modern 2.0 trends, PLM 2.0 is expecting to change this trend, provide more agile, open and lean the environment. In other words, “PLM 2.0 offers industry what Web 2.0 offers the general public”. But I’m asking myself… how will it happen tomorrow? Product Lifecycle Management is not a tool, like a mobile phone, a laptop or even database server that can be replaced. PLM is software that accumulates corporate knowledge, processes and intellectual property. How companies will be able to move from today’s legacy to tomorrow’s PLM 2.0?

I think that the following PLM capabilities might enable future move from PLM Legacy to PLM 2.0:

1. IP Representation

Today’s PLM system accumulates a lot of product knowledge. Future coming system needs to manage this IP and be able to absorb existing corporate knowledge. Similar to the new CAD system which needs to be able to open models created by previous CAD, PLM 2.0 needs to be able to work with IP created by current PLM/PDM system.

2. Process Streamlining

From my point of view, organizational processes  can not be changed in one day; many of today’s PLM implementations were not successful because they have tried to change the way companies had been working, in one day. This is impossible, in my view. So, PLM 2.0 needs to be capable to handle process transition in an organization.

3. Granularity.

I don’t see PLM 2.0 as a big universal tool. I believe PLM 2.0 needs to be deployed step by step and optimize existing PLM and enterprise environment in organization.

So, these are my thoughts about PLM 2.0 transformation. What are your opinions about them? I’d be happy to discuss.

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
24 November, 2009

Reading Jim Brown’s blog post “Choosing an ERP to Fit PLM?”, I started to ask myself why these systems fit...

28 February, 2017

For many years, single (or one) version of truth was a core principle of PLM data organization. It was a...

27 July, 2009

I had chance to discuss PLM adoption rate already several time. I think, adoption rate, is one of the factors...

11 June, 2009

Continuing my series of posts about fundamental PLM topics this week, I’d like to talk about PLM data today. Below...

6 June, 2017

I spent last two days attending Digital Factory and FUZE conferences organized by Formlabs and Desktop Metal – both Boston based...

16 May, 2011

I’m going to attend Eurostep Share-A-Space 2011 forum later this week in Stockholm, Sweden. The history of the invitation to...

21 September, 2018

The importance of software in modern manufacturing product is hard to underestimate. For the last decade we’ve seen how complex...

10 April, 2020

Yesterday was the Passover evening. This is a usual time for family and friends to get together around the table....

2 December, 2014

Technology can help us to expand horizons of possible and impossible. I’ve been experiencing this expansion earlier today while watching...

Blogroll

To the top