A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Do we need multi-faceted BOM compare?

Do we need multi-faceted BOM compare?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
10 July, 2009 | 2 min for reading

bom-compareThe following blog article by Anurag Batra drove my attention today – “Comparing BOM Structures: a multi-faceted need”. The author is asking if “BOM comparison” is needed function in the PLM system and especially interested in the “multi-faceted” Bill of Material comparison. He is asking these questions in the context of enhancements made in the new Agile 9.3. He wrote – “Most PDM, PLM and ERP systems offer the ability to compare Bills of Material structures side by side. Agile have had a BOM Comparison report for many years – it allowed for comparison of multiple BOM structures side by side. With 9.3, we’ve enhanced the report greatly – focusing on the use case of deep multi-level comparison between two BOM structures”. Later in this article Anurag explains new features, how possible to compare multiple levels of multiple release changes etc. According to him, Agile 9.3 version provides excellent features that improve the capability to compare Bill of Materials in multiple ways. I’ve been a bit confused in the end of Anurag’s post by his question to readers, how they actually compare BOMs and what can be possible use cases for newly introduced reports…

Here is my Think Tank question… Do we really want to compare the Bill of Materials? Except for the fact that we always excited by the features and capabilities of our software, I guess the comparison is a very complex task. Each time I’m trying to compare structures, I feel unsecured. To compare multi-level structures that include multiple changes is very complicated, in my view. I’d be very interested to see examples of multi-faceted BOM comparison Anurag is talking about…

Here is my view:
1.  Bill of Material comparison is a very complicated task.

2. Designers and Engineers are less interesting “to compare”, but more interesting to find the difference between two versions of designs of product structures.

3. Maybe we need to think about functions in our software that provide “results” and not put users in complicated scenarios of comparing multiple structures?

I’m looking forward to your responses and open discussion…

Best, Oleg

Disclaimer: I’m co-founder and CEO of OpenBOM developing a digital network-based platform that manages product data and connects manufacturers and their supply chain networksMy opinion can be unintentionally biased.

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
6 April, 2010

I’d like to put a short note this morning. It comes from my review of Patently Apple blog. The very...

13 November, 2014

Analytics is a hot word these days. You can hear it everywhere. It sounds and feels sweet and smart. You...

13 July, 2012

Design and engineering world are changing fast these days. 20 years ago, the objective of CAD and other engineering software...

28 July, 2016

For the last year, I had chance to talk many manufacturing companies in range from small hardware startups to large...

30 March, 2009

Hello New Week! After having a long ‘cloudy’ conversation last week, I feel like descending from the cloud back down...

15 November, 2011

Process vs. Data. I think, this topic not requires a special introduction. In my view, every PLM implementation is facing...

7 October, 2010

I read a blog post by Stephen Porter of Zero Wait State called – The PLM State: Why can’t we...

7 July, 2013

One of the looongest US weekends I remember  is going to end. This is a time to get back from...

8 October, 2010

The following Google Apps Blog caught my attention few days ago – More Tools For Viewing Document Revisions. I found...

Blogroll

To the top