A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Do we need multi-faceted BOM compare?

Do we need multi-faceted BOM compare?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
10 July, 2009 | 2 min for reading

bom-compareThe following blog article by Anurag Batra drove my attention today – “Comparing BOM Structures: a multi-faceted need”. The author is asking if “BOM comparison” is needed function in the PLM system and especially interested in the “multi-faceted” Bill of Material comparison. He is asking these questions in the context of enhancements made in the new Agile 9.3. He wrote – “Most PDM, PLM and ERP systems offer the ability to compare Bills of Material structures side by side. Agile have had a BOM Comparison report for many years – it allowed for comparison of multiple BOM structures side by side. With 9.3, we’ve enhanced the report greatly – focusing on the use case of deep multi-level comparison between two BOM structures”. Later in this article Anurag explains new features, how possible to compare multiple levels of multiple release changes etc. According to him, Agile 9.3 version provides excellent features that improve the capability to compare Bill of Materials in multiple ways. I’ve been a bit confused in the end of Anurag’s post by his question to readers, how they actually compare BOMs and what can be possible use cases for newly introduced reports…

Here is my Think Tank question… Do we really want to compare the Bill of Materials? Except for the fact that we always excited by the features and capabilities of our software, I guess the comparison is a very complex task. Each time I’m trying to compare structures, I feel unsecured. To compare multi-level structures that include multiple changes is very complicated, in my view. I’d be very interested to see examples of multi-faceted BOM comparison Anurag is talking about…

Here is my view:
1.  Bill of Material comparison is a very complicated task.

2. Designers and Engineers are less interesting “to compare”, but more interesting to find the difference between two versions of designs of product structures.

3. Maybe we need to think about functions in our software that provide “results” and not put users in complicated scenarios of comparing multiple structures?

I’m looking forward to your responses and open discussion…

Best, Oleg

Disclaimer: I’m co-founder and CEO of OpenBOM developing a digital network-based platform that manages product data and connects manufacturers and their supply chain networksMy opinion can be unintentionally biased.

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
5 November, 2023

In the world of manufacturing, product development, product data management, supply chain management, project management and engineering software, one topic...

5 January, 2010

Last year I had chance to talk about social aspects of PLM with Chris Williams from Vuuch.com. Moving enterprise software...

12 September, 2012

CAD and PLM means a lot of data these days. Thinking about growing complexity of products, the amount of information...

1 July, 2009

I want to discuss Enterprise 2.0. This term started to be popular during the last two-three years and stands for...

20 August, 2009

My short and powerful prompt today. Google launched Google Apps Scripts. I’d recommend to see video. [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ux-IexZFec&eurl=] I think, this...

3 December, 2017

Siemens PLM made some waves in PLM and IoT world last week by announcing availability of Siemens MindSphere platform for...

27 October, 2018

Data was always in the center of any PDM and PLM applications. The ability of PLM system to manage complex...

18 October, 2012

Open Source Software (OSS) is a wonderful thing. For the last decade, open source changed the world of software development....

10 March, 2011

Virtualization becomes an important piece of modern technological solutions. The time of physical servers is over. Businesses are actively seeking...

Blogroll

To the top