A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Do we need multi-faceted BOM compare?

Do we need multi-faceted BOM compare?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
10 July, 2009 | 2 min for reading

bom-compareThe following blog article by Anurag Batra drove my attention today – “Comparing BOM Structures: a multi-faceted need”. The author is asking if “BOM comparison” is needed function in the PLM system and especially interested in the “multi-faceted” Bill of Material comparison. He is asking these questions in the context of enhancements made in the new Agile 9.3. He wrote – “Most PDM, PLM and ERP systems offer the ability to compare Bills of Material structures side by side. Agile have had a BOM Comparison report for many years – it allowed for comparison of multiple BOM structures side by side. With 9.3, we’ve enhanced the report greatly – focusing on the use case of deep multi-level comparison between two BOM structures”. Later in this article Anurag explains new features, how possible to compare multiple levels of multiple release changes etc. According to him, Agile 9.3 version provides excellent features that improve the capability to compare Bill of Materials in multiple ways. I’ve been a bit confused in the end of Anurag’s post by his question to readers, how they actually compare BOMs and what can be possible use cases for newly introduced reports…

Here is my Think Tank question… Do we really want to compare the Bill of Materials? Except for the fact that we always excited by the features and capabilities of our software, I guess the comparison is a very complex task. Each time I’m trying to compare structures, I feel unsecured. To compare multi-level structures that include multiple changes is very complicated, in my view. I’d be very interested to see examples of multi-faceted BOM comparison Anurag is talking about…

Here is my view:
1.  Bill of Material comparison is a very complicated task.

2. Designers and Engineers are less interesting “to compare”, but more interesting to find the difference between two versions of designs of product structures.

3. Maybe we need to think about functions in our software that provide “results” and not put users in complicated scenarios of comparing multiple structures?

I’m looking forward to your responses and open discussion…

Best, Oleg

Disclaimer: I’m co-founder and CEO of OpenBOM developing a digital network-based platform that manages product data and connects manufacturers and their supply chain networksMy opinion can be unintentionally biased.

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
12 November, 2023

We live in a digital world. It doesn’t matter what we do and what business we are in, getting information...

11 September, 2011

Whenever I had a chance to speak about cloud solutions in the context of PLM, the normal reaction of people...

2 February, 2016

Differentiation and positioning might sounds like a very boring marketing term. But it is actually something that can become very...

17 January, 2019

The article today will be unusual. I was inspired by one of my readers to create an hierarchy of technology and...

10 August, 2013

Customization is a great deal in every enterprise software deployment. Despite all efforts of vendors to invent out of the...

5 May, 2016

Large CAD and PLM projects are very complex. They can involve multiple organizations, thousands of engineers and high level complexity...

11 May, 2010

I think, mobile becomes more and more important every day. The amount of mobile devices surrounding us is growing. Today’s...

25 September, 2013

BigData is trending these days. It goes everywhere. Marketing people are in love with this name. It brings such a...

26 March, 2010

COFES 2010 is just around the corner, and I had chance to discuss with Brad Holtz of Cyon Research the...

Blogroll

To the top